Head of US Teacher's Union is pushing the 1619 project.

[MarathonMike]

The head of the Teacher's Union is a White Guiltist pushing the 1619 project into the schools.

Teachers Union Head Claims ‘1619 Project’ Opponents Trying to Ban ‘Factual Version of Oppression’ in U.S. | National Review

The comments come amid a Department of Education push to adopt curriculum based on certain parts of the 1619 Project.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Street Juice]

Before I even go look, I'm guessing this person is Jewish.

 

[Street Juice]

Before I even go look, I'm guessing this person is Jewish.

Hahaha... "Randi Weingarten"

Every. Single. Time.

 

[Polishprince]

They hate America, that's all that it comes down to. Slavery of black people wasn't the basis of American civilization and never was. They know it, but the truth that America was built on the idea of Freedom including the Freedom to worship Almighty God as we felt led to do, just doesn't meet the liberal narrative.

 

[Street Juice]

They hate America, that's all that it comes down to. Slavery of black people wasn't the basis of American civilization and never was. They know it, but the truth that America was built on the idea of Freedom including the Freedom to worship Almighty God as we felt led to do, just doesn't meet the liberal narrative.

I'm afraid it is more sinister than that. Jews hate non-Jews. They hate with a genocidal hatred that Westerners simply cannot comprehend, even though it is spelled out explicitly in that obscenity called the "Old Testament" they lug back and forth to church every Sunday.

What do you want to bet this Randi Weingarten with her Jewish squawking about "true facts of oppression" would immediately call you an "anti-Semite" if you asked her if the Jewish owned New York Times' 1619 Project mentions that Jews dominated the trans-Atlantic slave trade? Or that they owned the South American plantations where the vast majority of Africans ended up and where conditions for slaves was far, far worse--the life expectancy being only a few years? Or that white Christians in Europe and North America were the first people in the history of humanity to cast slavery in moral terms and condemn it on those grounds? Or that white Christians are the only people in history who fought a brutal bloody war against each over, at the root, the treatment of members of another race?

What do you bet the 1619 Project doesn't mention the true fact that Jews are responsible for the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act that is making us a minority in our own country? Or that on the evening of October 3, 1965, after the signing ceremony in New York Harbor for the act, there were celebrations all across New York as Jews celebrated their crushing victory over the gentiles?

What do you want to bet that there will be no mention of the funding provided by American Jews of the murderous Jewish Bolsheviks without which the Bolsheviks would never have been able to take control of Russia and 66 million Russian Christians would have spared the vicious genocide unleashed on them in 1917?

I could go on and on, but you get the idea. Fuck Randi Weingarten and the New York Times and their Jewish lies. Any black or white American who doesn't realize by now that Jews are our mortal enemies is an idiot, a coward, or both.

 

[IM2]

The head of the Teacher's Union is a White Guiltist pushing the 1619 project into the schools.

Teachers Union Head Claims ‘1619 Project’ Opponents Trying to Ban ‘Factual Version of Oppression’ in U.S. | National Review

The comments come amid a Department of Education push to adopt curriculum based on certain parts of the 1619 Project.

www.nationalreview.com

No that teacher wants accurate history taught to their students.

 

[IM2]

They hate America, that's all that it comes down to. Slavery of black people wasn't the basis of American civilization and never was. They know it, but the truth that America was built on the idea of Freedom including the Freedom to worship Almighty God as we felt led to do, just doesn't meet the liberal narrative.

Slavery built this nation.

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry​

In todays money slaves were worth over 127 billion dollars. According to the Sublettes that is a conservative estimate, meaning the amount could be even more. In 1860 the total value of slaves was 17- and one-half times more than the money circulating in the economy. Slaves were worth more than the gold, silver, total U.S. currency, plus all the farmland in the South combined in 1860 yet did not receive a dime. Remember that slaves were considered property. Because they were, the following activity could occur.

During slavery, more specifically during the 19th century, wealthy slaveowners looking for a way to get additional capital to buy more slaves came up with an idea- slave backed securities. Your eyes are not playing tricks on you. Slaveowners securitized slavery. Cornell professors Edward E. Baptist and Louis Hyman detailed how it was done in an article published by the Chicago Sun-Times on its website dated March 7, 2014. This is from the article:

In the 1830s, powerful Southern slaveowners wanted to import capital into their states so they could buy more slaves. They came up with a new, two-part idea: mortgaging slaves; and then turning the mortgages into bonds that could be marketed all over the world.

First, American planters organized new banks, usually in new states like Mississippi and Louisiana. Drawing up lists of slaves for collateral, the planters then mortgaged them to the banks they had created, enabling themselves to buy additional slaves to expand cotton production. To provide capital for those loans, the banks sold bonds to investors from around the globe — London, New York, Amsterdam, Paris. The bond buyers, many of whom lived in countries where slavery was illegal, didn’t own individual slaves — just bonds backed by their value. Planters’ mortgage payments paid the interest and the principle on these bond payments. Enslaved human beings had been, in modern financial lingo, “securitized.”

As slave-backed mortgages became paper bonds, everybody profited — except, obviously, enslaved African Americans whose forced labor repaid owners’ mortgages. But investors owed a piece of slave-earned income. Older slave states such as Maryland and Virginia sold slaves to the new cotton states, at securitization-inflated prices, resulting in slave asset bubble. Cotton factor firms like the now-defunct Lehman Brothers — founded in Alabama — became wildly successful. Lehman moved to Wall Street, and for all these firms, every transaction in slave-earned money flowing in and out of the U.S. earned Wall Street firms a fee.

The infant American financial industry nourished itself on profits taken from financing slave traders, cotton brokers and underwriting slave-backed bonds. But though slavery ended in 1865, in the years after the Civil War, black entrepreneurs would find themselves excluded from a financial system originally built on their bodies.

Edward E. Baptist and Louis Hyman, American Finance Grew on the Back of Slaves​

 

[excalibur]

Slavery built this nation.

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

The North had a huge number of factories, none of which had anything to do with slavery. Slavery was never of any consequence in the North and all Northern states had ended slavery by 1804.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Left is not mending race relations, they are teaching children to hate each other.
The Dems are destroying America's future on purpose.

 

[cnm]

Head of US Teacher's Union is pushing the 1619 project.​

Anyone would think the US was trying to ignore its slavery past and hadn't yet held a reconciliation conversation about it.

 

[cnm]

The North had a huge number of factories, none of which had anything to do with slavery. Slavery was never of any consequence in the North and all Northern states had ended slavery by 1804.

The North's economy depended on processing the output of slave labour.

 

[cnm]

Like the textile mills in the North didn't process cotton. Right.

 

[Colin norris]

The head of the Teacher's Union is a White Guiltist pushing the 1619 project into the schools.

Teachers Union Head Claims ‘1619 Project’ Opponents Trying to Ban ‘Factual Version of Oppression’ in U.S. | National Review

The comments come amid a Department of Education push to adopt curriculum based on certain parts of the 1619 Project.

www.nationalreview.com

Marathon Mike.
How do you think that ignorant statement went over? Did you get the support you wanted?
Try Again.

 

[IM2]

Slavery built this nation.

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

The North had a huge number of factories, none of which had anything to do with slavery. Slavery was never of any consequence in the North and all Northern states had ended slavery by 1804.

Incorrect.

 

[IM2]

The Left is not mending race relations, they are teaching children to hate each other.
The Dems are destroying America's future on purpose.

No, they are teaching children not to live in the same lie we did.

 

[Mac-7]

Slavery built this nation.

Thats delusional

12% of the population cannot be responsible for 100% of the wealth

Or even 50%

25% ?

Maybe

But remember that slavery did not exist in all the states

And certainly not the richest states

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Slavery built this nation.

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

The North had a huge number of factories, none of which had anything to do with slavery. Slavery was never of any consequence in the North and all Northern states had ended slavery by 1804.

Slavery was never part of the western expansion or the gold rush or the industrial revolution.

Slavery itself is the tit blacks stick in their mouths to feel good about themselves,

 

[EvilCat Breath]

View attachment 487840
Like the textile mills in the North didn't process cotton. Right.

They wo e cotton into cloth they did not use slaves. They used child labor.

 

[excalibur]

Slavery built this nation.

“By a conservative estimate, in 1860 the total value of American slaves was $4 billion, far more than the gold and silver then circulating nationally ($228.3 million, “most of it in the North,” the authors add), total currency ($435.4 million), and even the value of the South’s total farmland ($1.92 billion). Slaves were, to slavers, worth more than everything else they could imagine combined.”

The North had a huge number of factories, none of which had anything to do with slavery. Slavery was never of any consequence in the North and all Northern states had ended slavery by 1804.

Slavery was never part of the western expansion or the gold rush or the industrial revolution.

Slavery itself is the tit blacks stick in their mouths to feel good about themselves,

If it is so damned bad for backs in America then emigrate.

 

[cnm]

They wo e cotton into cloth they did not use slaves. They used child labor.

From where did the cotton come?

Unpaid labour.