Zone1 Have potentially effective treatments for cancer been suppressed?

[JohnDB]

Each cancer has been tracked through the trillions of dollars of research..


Not all....but most.

As such they have statistical analysis of which chemotherapy works best and most effectively. They always have several formulations of chemotherapy to choose from...all costing various amounts.
From $10k-$40k per dose.

Some will work less effectively....

Which one you get depends upon your medical insurance provider....
A medicine with only 20% effectiveness will get tried first because it's so much cheaper than the 80% effective treatment.
All ordered and enforced by your insurance....not anyone else. Not your doctor, not the drug maker or middleman.....

This is why Medical Savings Accounts have become popular. Because when you have cancer, time is critical and wasting time on ineffective treatments because they are substantially less expensive than the effective medicine is NOT in your best interest....only the interest of your insurance company. And because of this....people have suffered and died.

You making the choices can not only shorten your sick time it can literally save your life.

 

[DennisPTate]

Each cancer has been tracked through the trillions of dollars of research..


Not all....but most.

As such they have statistical analysis of which chemotherapy works best and most effectively. They always have several formulations of chemotherapy to choose from...all costing various amounts.
From $10k-$40k per dose.

Some will work less effectively....

Which one you get depends upon your medical insurance provider....
A medicine with only 20% effectiveness will get tried first because it's so much cheaper than the 80% effective treatment.
All ordered and enforced by your insurance....not anyone else. Not your doctor, not the drug maker or middleman.....

This is why Medical Savings Accounts have become popular. Because when you have cancer, time is critical and wasting time on ineffective treatments because they are substantially less expensive than the effective medicine is NOT in your best interest....only the interest of your insurance company. And because of this....people have suffered and died.

You making the choices can not only shorten your sick time it can literally save your life.

The Dr. Stanislav Burzynski treatments don't have to be so expensive if medical bureaucrats did not keep him in court so much over technicalities.

 

[JohnDB]

The Dr. Stanislav Burzynski treatments don't have to be so expensive if medical bureaucrats did not keep him in court so much over technicalities.

I don't know anything about him....

What I do know is that several Cancer centers tried to have the highest success rate of curing cancer. Because if you cure the most....well....you get the idea.

So they used all available research and TRIED to use the best options for their patients...and the insurance companies threw fit after fits....
Unauthorized treatments don't get reimbursed...

 

[DennisPTate]

I don't know anything about him....

What I do know is that several Cancer centers tried to have the highest success rate of curing cancer. Because if you cure the most....well....you get the idea.

So they used all available research and TRIED to use the best options for their patients...and the insurance companies threw fit after fits....
Unauthorized treatments don't get reimbursed...

But they probably ignored Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski due to his co-author convincing him to find out the smallest doses that would be effective first. She was apparently working for a BigPharma company though and they wanted to make his treatments look like they were less effective so that they could buy him out at a lower price?