Harris-Biden Plan For Petrochemical Industry

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,753
2,220
Their lies are so stupid and yet typical for Dems.



Former vice president and Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s energy platform, if enacted, would end using hydraulic fracturing technology to harvest oil and natural gas that has allowed the U.S. to become energy independent while creating millions of American jobs.
During his presidential campaign, Biden has said he would “phase out” and eliminate fossil fuels, including getting rid of fracking.
His running mate, Democrat vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris said: “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”
Biden has come under scrutiny for his anti-fracking stance and has since said he is not against the practice, but it is unclear how this claim of a change of heart from him would play out in a Biden administration.
Real Clear Energy explained what ending fracking would mean for Americans from coast to coast:
Struggling through such an extraordinary time, where demand and prices have both unexpectedly plummeted, 2020 has been perhaps the most difficult year in the history of the U.S. oil and gas industry. Yet we have no choice but to rebound. Oil and gas meet 65% of America’s energy demand and remain simply irreplaceable at scale. So much so, that a lack of investments in new supply today could easily begin to spike prices in just a few years as demand inevitably rebounds: “$190 Oil? J.P. Morgan Thinks It’s Possible.”
In the fracking and shale-era from 2008-2019, for instance, U.S. crude oil production was up 160 percent, and gas increased 70 percent. Fracking now accounts for 80 percent of our oil and gas output and has transformed the U.S. into an energy powerhouse, producing more oil than Saudi Arabia and more gas than Russia.
Banning fracking would also make it nearly impossible to export oil and gas. In 2019 alone, the U.S. exported over 3 million b/d of crude oil and increased gas exports by almost 25%. From basically nothing in 2016, the U.S. is now the third largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), deemed the fastest growing commodity in 2019 – and essential to net-zero goals. This explains why the U.S. Department of Energy projects: “global natural gas consumption increases more than 40 percent between 2018 and 2050.” America’s oil and gas exports mean rising economic prosperity, but perhaps most importantly we can now help meet the desperate needs of energy-poor nations across the world.
Real Clear Energy noted five significant problems with the Biden-Harris energy plan: (1) a direct threat to U.S. national security, (2) morally unjust, (3) works against climate change goals, (4) increase energy prices, and (5) put millions of Americans out of work.
In the battleground state of Pennsylvania alone the impact of fracking is staggering, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute and the Marcellus Shale Coalition.
 
Their lies are so stupid and yet typical for Dems.



Former vice president and Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s energy platform, if enacted, would end using hydraulic fracturing technology to harvest oil and natural gas that has allowed the U.S. to become energy independent while creating millions of American jobs.
During his presidential campaign, Biden has said he would “phase out” and eliminate fossil fuels, including getting rid of fracking.
His running mate, Democrat vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris said: “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”
Biden has come under scrutiny for his anti-fracking stance and has since said he is not against the practice, but it is unclear how this claim of a change of heart from him would play out in a Biden administration.
Real Clear Energy explained what ending fracking would mean for Americans from coast to coast:
Struggling through such an extraordinary time, where demand and prices have both unexpectedly plummeted, 2020 has been perhaps the most difficult year in the history of the U.S. oil and gas industry. Yet we have no choice but to rebound. Oil and gas meet 65% of America’s energy demand and remain simply irreplaceable at scale. So much so, that a lack of investments in new supply today could easily begin to spike prices in just a few years as demand inevitably rebounds: “$190 Oil? J.P. Morgan Thinks It’s Possible.”
In the fracking and shale-era from 2008-2019, for instance, U.S. crude oil production was up 160 percent, and gas increased 70 percent. Fracking now accounts for 80 percent of our oil and gas output and has transformed the U.S. into an energy powerhouse, producing more oil than Saudi Arabia and more gas than Russia.
Banning fracking would also make it nearly impossible to export oil and gas. In 2019 alone, the U.S. exported over 3 million b/d of crude oil and increased gas exports by almost 25%. From basically nothing in 2016, the U.S. is now the third largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), deemed the fastest growing commodity in 2019 – and essential to net-zero goals. This explains why the U.S. Department of Energy projects: “global natural gas consumption increases more than 40 percent between 2018 and 2050.” America’s oil and gas exports mean rising economic prosperity, but perhaps most importantly we can now help meet the desperate needs of energy-poor nations across the world.
Real Clear Energy noted five significant problems with the Biden-Harris energy plan: (1) a direct threat to U.S. national security, (2) morally unjust, (3) works against climate change goals, (4) increase energy prices, and (5) put millions of Americans out of work.
In the battleground state of Pennsylvania alone the impact of fracking is staggering, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute and the Marcellus Shale Coalition.
Biden: 'I am not banning fracking'
Kate Sullivan byline
By Kate Sullivan, CNN

Updated 6:26 PM ET, Mon August 31, 2020
200831141907-03-biden-pittsburgh-0831-exlarge-169.jpg

AP FACT CHECK: Trump falsifies Biden stance on fracking
By CALVIN WOODWARDOctober 13, 2020
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is persisting with the myth that Democratic rival Joe Biden proposes to ban fracking. Biden doesn’t.
No, Biden Wouldn't Ban All Fracking
Pence's answers on energy and climate were full of misdirection and misinformation.
Ronald Bailey | 10.8.2020 12:15 AM

The biggest threat to US fracking is Donnie's buddy the murderous Saudi prince after donnie "saved his ass".
Bloodbath For America’s Oil Frackers As Saudis Declare Price War On Russia
 
Biden is just a confused old man. Why the hell would we want to wreck this country with this buffoon? Vote Republican
I agree Maj Gen Kelly, speaking of trump:
"The depths of his dishonesty is just astounding to me. The dishonesty, the transactional nature of every relationship, though it's more pathetic than anything else. He is the most flawed person I have ever met in my life," Kelly has told friends, the outlet reported.
Kelly added that "I think we really need to step back. I think we need to look harder at who we elect.”
"What is their character like? What are their ethics?" he continued. "Are they willing, if they’re elected, to represent all of their constituents, not just the base, but all of their constituents? And then look at the politics."
Earlier this year, Kelly said that he agreed with former Defense Secretary James Mattis’s criticism of the president’s handling of protests following the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
Mattis lashed out at Trump in a statement to The Atlantic over his handling of the protests, saying that Trump is the first president in his lifetime “who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try.”

I voted for Joe Biden and you should too, for the good of the country.
 
Their lies are so stupid and yet typical for Dems.



Former vice president and Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s energy platform, if enacted, would end using hydraulic fracturing technology to harvest oil and natural gas that has allowed the U.S. to become energy independent while creating millions of American jobs.
During his presidential campaign, Biden has said he would “phase out” and eliminate fossil fuels, including getting rid of fracking.
His running mate, Democrat vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris said: “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”
Biden has come under scrutiny for his anti-fracking stance and has since said he is not against the practice, but it is unclear how this claim of a change of heart from him would play out in a Biden administration.
Real Clear Energy explained what ending fracking would mean for Americans from coast to coast:
Struggling through such an extraordinary time, where demand and prices have both unexpectedly plummeted, 2020 has been perhaps the most difficult year in the history of the U.S. oil and gas industry. Yet we have no choice but to rebound. Oil and gas meet 65% of America’s energy demand and remain simply irreplaceable at scale. So much so, that a lack of investments in new supply today could easily begin to spike prices in just a few years as demand inevitably rebounds: “$190 Oil? J.P. Morgan Thinks It’s Possible.”
In the fracking and shale-era from 2008-2019, for instance, U.S. crude oil production was up 160 percent, and gas increased 70 percent. Fracking now accounts for 80 percent of our oil and gas output and has transformed the U.S. into an energy powerhouse, producing more oil than Saudi Arabia and more gas than Russia.
Banning fracking would also make it nearly impossible to export oil and gas. In 2019 alone, the U.S. exported over 3 million b/d of crude oil and increased gas exports by almost 25%. From basically nothing in 2016, the U.S. is now the third largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), deemed the fastest growing commodity in 2019 – and essential to net-zero goals. This explains why the U.S. Department of Energy projects: “global natural gas consumption increases more than 40 percent between 2018 and 2050.” America’s oil and gas exports mean rising economic prosperity, but perhaps most importantly we can now help meet the desperate needs of energy-poor nations across the world.
Real Clear Energy noted five significant problems with the Biden-Harris energy plan: (1) a direct threat to U.S. national security, (2) morally unjust, (3) works against climate change goals, (4) increase energy prices, and (5) put millions of Americans out of work.
In the battleground state of Pennsylvania alone the impact of fracking is staggering, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute and the Marcellus Shale Coalition.
Biden: 'I am not banning fracking'
Kate Sullivan byline
By Kate Sullivan, CNN

Updated 6:26 PM ET, Mon August 31, 2020
200831141907-03-biden-pittsburgh-0831-exlarge-169.jpg

AP FACT CHECK: Trump falsifies Biden stance on fracking
By CALVIN WOODWARDOctober 13, 2020
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is persisting with the myth that Democratic rival Joe Biden proposes to ban fracking. Biden doesn’t.
No, Biden Wouldn't Ban All Fracking
Pence's answers on energy and climate were full of misdirection and misinformation.
Ronald Bailey | 10.8.2020 12:15 AM

The biggest threat to US fracking is Donnie's buddy the murderous Saudi prince after donnie "saved his ass".
Bloodbath For America’s Oil Frackers As Saudis Declare Price War On Russia
Hack much?

 
Their lies are so stupid and yet typical for Dems.



Former vice president and Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s energy platform, if enacted, would end using hydraulic fracturing technology to harvest oil and natural gas that has allowed the U.S. to become energy independent while creating millions of American jobs.
During his presidential campaign, Biden has said he would “phase out” and eliminate fossil fuels, including getting rid of fracking.
His running mate, Democrat vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris said: “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”
Biden has come under scrutiny for his anti-fracking stance and has since said he is not against the practice, but it is unclear how this claim of a change of heart from him would play out in a Biden administration.
Real Clear Energy explained what ending fracking would mean for Americans from coast to coast:
Struggling through such an extraordinary time, where demand and prices have both unexpectedly plummeted, 2020 has been perhaps the most difficult year in the history of the U.S. oil and gas industry. Yet we have no choice but to rebound. Oil and gas meet 65% of America’s energy demand and remain simply irreplaceable at scale. So much so, that a lack of investments in new supply today could easily begin to spike prices in just a few years as demand inevitably rebounds: “$190 Oil? J.P. Morgan Thinks It’s Possible.”
In the fracking and shale-era from 2008-2019, for instance, U.S. crude oil production was up 160 percent, and gas increased 70 percent. Fracking now accounts for 80 percent of our oil and gas output and has transformed the U.S. into an energy powerhouse, producing more oil than Saudi Arabia and more gas than Russia.
Banning fracking would also make it nearly impossible to export oil and gas. In 2019 alone, the U.S. exported over 3 million b/d of crude oil and increased gas exports by almost 25%. From basically nothing in 2016, the U.S. is now the third largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), deemed the fastest growing commodity in 2019 – and essential to net-zero goals. This explains why the U.S. Department of Energy projects: “global natural gas consumption increases more than 40 percent between 2018 and 2050.” America’s oil and gas exports mean rising economic prosperity, but perhaps most importantly we can now help meet the desperate needs of energy-poor nations across the world.
Real Clear Energy noted five significant problems with the Biden-Harris energy plan: (1) a direct threat to U.S. national security, (2) morally unjust, (3) works against climate change goals, (4) increase energy prices, and (5) put millions of Americans out of work.
In the battleground state of Pennsylvania alone the impact of fracking is staggering, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute and the Marcellus Shale Coalition.
Biden: 'I am not banning fracking'
Kate Sullivan byline
By Kate Sullivan, CNN

Updated 6:26 PM ET, Mon August 31, 2020
200831141907-03-biden-pittsburgh-0831-exlarge-169.jpg

AP FACT CHECK: Trump falsifies Biden stance on fracking
By CALVIN WOODWARDOctober 13, 2020
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is persisting with the myth that Democratic rival Joe Biden proposes to ban fracking. Biden doesn’t.
No, Biden Wouldn't Ban All Fracking
Pence's answers on energy and climate were full of misdirection and misinformation.
Ronald Bailey | 10.8.2020 12:15 AM

The biggest threat to US fracking is Donnie's buddy the murderous Saudi prince after donnie "saved his ass".
Bloodbath For America’s Oil Frackers As Saudis Declare Price War On Russia
Hack much?


Yes. He is
 
Right wingers don't care about social costs, only capital costs for their bottom line.

Conventional oil and gas production has been known for some time to create harmful air emissions.5 With the increase in fracking activity, more and more studies now document emissions of airborne pollutants at and near fracking sites that are known to cause cancer and harm the nervous, respiratory, and immune systems (see Figure 1). At the same time, people and communities in areas with many hydraulically fractured wells report health problems consistent with these types of exposures.6,7,8,9,10--https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/fracking-air-pollution-IB.pdf

There are plenty of emerging technologies that could be job creators, upgrading to 5G can only help potential labor market participants work from home if necessary with many emerging technologies.
 
Their lies are so stupid and yet typical for Dems.



Former vice president and Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden’s energy platform, if enacted, would end using hydraulic fracturing technology to harvest oil and natural gas that has allowed the U.S. to become energy independent while creating millions of American jobs.
During his presidential campaign, Biden has said he would “phase out” and eliminate fossil fuels, including getting rid of fracking.
His running mate, Democrat vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris said: “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”
Biden has come under scrutiny for his anti-fracking stance and has since said he is not against the practice, but it is unclear how this claim of a change of heart from him would play out in a Biden administration.
Real Clear Energy explained what ending fracking would mean for Americans from coast to coast:
Struggling through such an extraordinary time, where demand and prices have both unexpectedly plummeted, 2020 has been perhaps the most difficult year in the history of the U.S. oil and gas industry. Yet we have no choice but to rebound. Oil and gas meet 65% of America’s energy demand and remain simply irreplaceable at scale. So much so, that a lack of investments in new supply today could easily begin to spike prices in just a few years as demand inevitably rebounds: “$190 Oil? J.P. Morgan Thinks It’s Possible.”
In the fracking and shale-era from 2008-2019, for instance, U.S. crude oil production was up 160 percent, and gas increased 70 percent. Fracking now accounts for 80 percent of our oil and gas output and has transformed the U.S. into an energy powerhouse, producing more oil than Saudi Arabia and more gas than Russia.
Banning fracking would also make it nearly impossible to export oil and gas. In 2019 alone, the U.S. exported over 3 million b/d of crude oil and increased gas exports by almost 25%. From basically nothing in 2016, the U.S. is now the third largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), deemed the fastest growing commodity in 2019 – and essential to net-zero goals. This explains why the U.S. Department of Energy projects: “global natural gas consumption increases more than 40 percent between 2018 and 2050.” America’s oil and gas exports mean rising economic prosperity, but perhaps most importantly we can now help meet the desperate needs of energy-poor nations across the world.
Real Clear Energy noted five significant problems with the Biden-Harris energy plan: (1) a direct threat to U.S. national security, (2) morally unjust, (3) works against climate change goals, (4) increase energy prices, and (5) put millions of Americans out of work.
In the battleground state of Pennsylvania alone the impact of fracking is staggering, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute and the Marcellus Shale Coalition.
Biden: 'I am not banning fracking'
Kate Sullivan byline
By Kate Sullivan, CNN

Updated 6:26 PM ET, Mon August 31, 2020
200831141907-03-biden-pittsburgh-0831-exlarge-169.jpg

AP FACT CHECK: Trump falsifies Biden stance on fracking
By CALVIN WOODWARDOctober 13, 2020
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is persisting with the myth that Democratic rival Joe Biden proposes to ban fracking. Biden doesn’t.
No, Biden Wouldn't Ban All Fracking
Pence's answers on energy and climate were full of misdirection and misinformation.
Ronald Bailey | 10.8.2020 12:15 AM

The biggest threat to US fracking is Donnie's buddy the murderous Saudi prince after donnie "saved his ass".
Bloodbath For America’s Oil Frackers As Saudis Declare Price War On Russia


~~~~~~
 
Biden is just a confused old man. Why the hell would we want to wreck this country with this buffoon? Vote Republican
I agree Maj Gen Kelly, speaking of trump:
"The depths of his dishonesty is just astounding to me. The dishonesty, the transactional nature of every relationship, though it's more pathetic than anything else. He is the most flawed person I have ever met in my life," Kelly has told friends, the outlet reported.
Kelly added that "I think we really need to step back. I think we need to look harder at who we elect.”
"What is their character like? What are their ethics?" he continued. "Are they willing, if they’re elected, to represent all of their constituents, not just the base, but all of their constituents? And then look at the politics."
Earlier this year, Kelly said that he agreed with former Defense Secretary James Mattis’s criticism of the president’s handling of protests following the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
Mattis lashed out at Trump in a statement to The Atlantic over his handling of the protests, saying that Trump is the first president in his lifetime “who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try.”

I voted for Joe Biden and you should too, for the good of the country.
I question your judgement. You use an article proclaiming character and ethics as essential qualities in a President to justify your vote for Biden? .You must have a real good imagination. Biden represents the globalist establishment. No thank you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top