Harbinger? Texas Border Town With 85% Hispanic Population Flips Red, Elects Republican Mayor!!!

Capitalism, What is That sayeth the right-wing. I have read that some people pay up to several thousand dollars to smugglers. The private sector could easily accommodate that price range and provide better service and reduce pressure on our southern border.
You want the American taxpayer to foot the bill to get immigrants from the Mexican border to New York?
Re-read what I wrote.
I did. You don't make any more sense the second time around. You think we could solve our southern border problem by re-opening Ellis Island but have no way to get the immigrants from the border to New York, and what you would do with them once they got there.
(Private sector) Capitalism, What is That sayeth the Right-Wing every time it comes up outside of socialism threads.
 
Latinos want to work and keep the most of their paycheck. Democrats will dump them like they did working white men.
Right-wingers insist on a work ethic in at-will employment States; almost like the good olde days.
There's a reason why they were the good old days, because people had pride in their ability and responsibility to provide for themselves and their families. No one took welfare unless they really needed to, and got off it as fast as possible.
Not as far as I am concerned. It was only ignorance of economics that enabled that attitude. Otherwise, corporate welfare would have never been created.
Economics doesn't drive work ethic. Work ethic can improve the economy. It doesn't matter that you want to get paid for doing nothing, it's not good for the economy.
 
What gets you farther…. A work ethic or entitlement payments?
Is that why black codes were invented; to make sure those persons didn't get as far?
Where are there Black codes?
Where is there equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? Are blacks not affected.
There is equal protection. The law doesn't care if you're black, white, red or green. If you quit a job, you can't collect UC. Equal protection abounds for all. This should be interesting, how do you think a law that is totally colorblind amounts to a black code? You get extra points if you construct an actual sentence.
You miss the point. The law is employment at will. This is what that means:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

There is no lawful basis to deny or disparage that legal right via public policies.
I know. We've been through this, and you're STILL the only one that thinks there's any disparagement. There isn't in case you forgot.
So what. I already know right-wingers have nothing but appeals to ignorance not Any understanding of the laws.
 
What gets you farther…. A work ethic or entitlement payments?
Is that why black codes were invented; to make sure those persons didn't get as far?
Where are there Black codes?
Where is there equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? Are blacks not affected.
There is equal protection. The law doesn't care if you're black, white, red or green. If you quit a job, you can't collect UC. Equal protection abounds for all. This should be interesting, how do you think a law that is totally colorblind amounts to a black code? You get extra points if you construct an actual sentence.
You miss the point. The law is employment at will. This is what that means:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

There is no lawful basis to deny or disparage that legal right via public policies.
I know. We've been through this, and you're STILL the only one that thinks there's any disparagement. There isn't in case you forgot.
So what. I already know right-wingers have nothing but appeals to ignorance not Any understanding of the laws.
And, as you will shortly find out from your lawsuit, you're the only one who thinks the way you do.
 
What gets you farther…. A work ethic or entitlement payments?
Is that why black codes were invented; to make sure those persons didn't get as far?
Where are there Black codes?
Where is there equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? Are blacks not affected.
There is equal protection. The law doesn't care if you're black, white, red or green. If you quit a job, you can't collect UC. Equal protection abounds for all. This should be interesting, how do you think a law that is totally colorblind amounts to a black code? You get extra points if you construct an actual sentence.
You miss the point. The law is employment at will. This is what that means:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

There is no lawful basis to deny or disparage that legal right via public policies.
I know. We've been through this, and you're STILL the only one that thinks there's any disparagement. There isn't in case you forgot.
So what. I already know right-wingers have nothing but appeals to ignorance not Any understanding of the laws.
And, as you will shortly find out from your lawsuit, you're the only one who thinks the way you do.
I resort to the fewest fallacies not those of the Opposing View.
 
What gets you farther…. A work ethic or entitlement payments?
Is that why black codes were invented; to make sure those persons didn't get as far?
Where are there Black codes?
Where is there equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? Are blacks not affected.
There is equal protection. The law doesn't care if you're black, white, red or green. If you quit a job, you can't collect UC. Equal protection abounds for all. This should be interesting, how do you think a law that is totally colorblind amounts to a black code? You get extra points if you construct an actual sentence.
You miss the point. The law is employment at will. This is what that means:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

There is no lawful basis to deny or disparage that legal right via public policies.
I know. We've been through this, and you're STILL the only one that thinks there's any disparagement. There isn't in case you forgot.
So what. I already know right-wingers have nothing but appeals to ignorance not Any understanding of the laws.
And, as you will shortly find out from your lawsuit, you're the only one who thinks the way you do.
I resort to the fewest fallacies not those of the Opposing View.
Just let us know when you win your lawsuit getting UC funds for quitting your job.
 
What gets you farther…. A work ethic or entitlement payments?
Is that why black codes were invented; to make sure those persons didn't get as far?
Where are there Black codes?
Where is there equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? Are blacks not affected.
There is equal protection. The law doesn't care if you're black, white, red or green. If you quit a job, you can't collect UC. Equal protection abounds for all. This should be interesting, how do you think a law that is totally colorblind amounts to a black code? You get extra points if you construct an actual sentence.
You miss the point. The law is employment at will. This is what that means:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

There is no lawful basis to deny or disparage that legal right via public policies.
I know. We've been through this, and you're STILL the only one that thinks there's any disparagement. There isn't in case you forgot.
So what. I already know right-wingers have nothing but appeals to ignorance not Any understanding of the laws.
And, as you will shortly find out from your lawsuit, you're the only one who thinks the way you do.
I resort to the fewest fallacies not those of the Opposing View.
Just let us know when you win your lawsuit getting UC funds for quitting your job.
No problem. I can dumb issues down enough for the right-wing on these boards; I can easily simplify it for Any jury.
 
What gets you farther…. A work ethic or entitlement payments?
Is that why black codes were invented; to make sure those persons didn't get as far?
Where are there Black codes?
Where is there equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States? Are blacks not affected.
There is equal protection. The law doesn't care if you're black, white, red or green. If you quit a job, you can't collect UC. Equal protection abounds for all. This should be interesting, how do you think a law that is totally colorblind amounts to a black code? You get extra points if you construct an actual sentence.
You miss the point. The law is employment at will. This is what that means:

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

There is no lawful basis to deny or disparage that legal right via public policies.
I know. We've been through this, and you're STILL the only one that thinks there's any disparagement. There isn't in case you forgot.
So what. I already know right-wingers have nothing but appeals to ignorance not Any understanding of the laws.
And, as you will shortly find out from your lawsuit, you're the only one who thinks the way you do.
I resort to the fewest fallacies not those of the Opposing View.
Just let us know when you win your lawsuit getting UC funds for quitting your job.
No problem. I can dumb issues down enough for the right-wing on these boards; I can easily simplify it for Any jury.
You can make it sound as dumb as you want, there's no disparagement.
 
McAllen, Texas, is a blue city. At least it was. Yesterday, it officially flipped to red as Javier Villalobos defeated Democrat Veronica Vela Whitacre by a narrow margin in the mayoral runoff election.



Despite being safely blue with a huge majority of Hispanic voters, the border town has been one of the many to experience massive human smuggling activities ever since Democrats took control in Washington DC. Illegal immigration was at the heart of the campaigns on both sides, but it’s hard for a Democrat to have credibility by opposing illegal immigration when their party is embracing open borders policies.

For those in cities and states affected by the Democrats’ border crisis, this race could be a harbinger for future elections as well as a roadmap for future Republican success. With the economy fading fast after showing signs of recovery in the last few months under President Trump, the border crisis will act as a separate reminder of the Democratic Party’s failures.

Pay attention to McAllen, Texas, GOP. If opposing open borders in a city with an 85% Hispanic population can resonate, it should be the rallying cry for a red wave in 2022.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeplaybook.com ...

A lot of Hispanics supported President Trump. OVER 30% in the last electoon! We are making a big mistake if we write the Hispanic vote off....We should be cultivating them! Just like every other ethnic group they have their bad mixed in with the good!
Ah, the Valley of Downs.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 007
PC and play nice and let criminals be criminal and acceptance of illegals and all the virtue signaling horeshit that has been forced upon us has an ending point when your very own friends and family suffer under it.
 
Not worth equal for pay purposes? I have no problem practicing full body massage with Happy ending and g-spot focus work with willing participants. Why do you have a problem being sugar and spice and everything nice?
I am very far from being anything nice. Instead of sugar and spice, I am DCon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top