Hamas announces: No Gaza border protests this Friday - report

[Hollie]

◈ "The partition of Palestine came about through the unilateral proclamation of the State of - Israel (May 14, 1948) and the armed conflict between Israel and her Arab neighbour States (- Israel and the Arab States)."

Has nothing to do with Palestine. Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war. It has always been civilians defending their territory.

You remain befuddled. Hamas has a "military wing". They parade around in military uniforms during their silly fashion parades.

Look it up, on YouTube.

 

[Hollie]

◈ "The partition of Palestine came about through the unilateral proclamation of the State of - Israel (May 14, 1948) and the armed conflict between Israel and her Arab neighbour States (- Israel and the Arab States)."

Has nothing to do with Palestine. Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war. It has always been civilians defending their territory.

Were the non-islamic dhimmis defending territory controlled by the caliphate?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Hamas announces: No Gaza border protests this Friday - report
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is an absurd response. Even for you... These (Posting #18 and #19) are childlike answers.

Has nothing to do with Palestine. Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war. It has always been civilians defending their territory.

(COMMENT)

You cannot say both statements are true simultaneously.


Most Respectfully,
R

You can. Even without a military, Palestinian civilians are always resisting Israel's aggression.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Hamas announces: No Gaza border protests this Friday - report
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is an absurd response. Even for you... These (Posting #18 and #19) are childlike answers.

Has nothing to do with Palestine. Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war. It has always been civilians defending their territory.

(COMMENT)

You cannot say both statements are true simultaneously.


Most Respectfully,
R

You can. Even without a military, Palestinian civilians are always resisting Israel's aggression.

No military?




I gave you a chance to look it up. You failed to do so.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Hamas announces: No Gaza border protests this Friday - report
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You get this wrong quite frequently.

◈ "The partition of Palestine came about through the unilateral proclamation of the State of - Israel (May 14, 1948) and the armed conflict between Israel and her Arab neighbour States (- Israel and the Arab States)."

Has nothing to do with Palestine. Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war. It has always been civilians defending their territory.

(COMMENT)

"War" is a term used by in a non-specific way.

International humanitarian law distinguishes two types of armed conflicts, namely:

◈ International Armed Conflicts (IAC), opposing two or more States, and

◈ Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIAC), between governmental forces and non-governmental armed groups, or between such groups only. IHL treaty law also establishes a distinction between NIAC in the meaning of common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and NIACs falling within the definition provided in Art. 1 of Additional Protocol II​

There has not been a time, since the time of the Palestinian Black Hand (1930s), that there has not been a NIAC that has been operating within the confines of the limits of the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine (1922) applied. Today, there are a half-dozen significant non-governmental armed groups within the limits of that demarcation.

(SPECIFICALLY)

To say that "Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war" is to disseminate misinformation.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Hamas announces: No Gaza border protests this Friday - report
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You get this wrong quite frequently.

◈ "The partition of Palestine came about through the unilateral proclamation of the State of - Israel (May 14, 1948) and the armed conflict between Israel and her Arab neighbour States (- Israel and the Arab States)."

Has nothing to do with Palestine. Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war. It has always been civilians defending their territory.

(COMMENT)

"War" is a term used by in a non-specific way.

International humanitarian law distinguishes two types of armed conflicts, namely:

◈ International Armed Conflicts (IAC), opposing two or more States, and

◈ Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIAC), between governmental forces and non-governmental armed groups, or between such groups only. IHL treaty law also establishes a distinction between NIAC in the meaning of common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and NIACs falling within the definition provided in Art. 1 of Additional Protocol II​

There has not been a time, since the time of the Palestinian Black Hand (1930s), that there has not been a NIAC that has been operating within the confines of the limits of the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine (1922) applied. Today, there are a half-dozen significant non-governmental armed groups within the limits of that demarcation.

(SPECIFICALLY)

To say that "Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war" is to disseminate misinformation.


Most Respectfully,
R

It has always been foreign military attacking Palestinian civilians.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Hamas announces: No Gaza border protests this Friday - report
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You get this wrong quite frequently.

◈ "The partition of Palestine came about through the unilateral proclamation of the State of - Israel (May 14, 1948) and the armed conflict between Israel and her Arab neighbour States (- Israel and the Arab States)."

Has nothing to do with Palestine. Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war. It has always been civilians defending their territory.

(COMMENT)

"War" is a term used by in a non-specific way.

International humanitarian law distinguishes two types of armed conflicts, namely:

◈ International Armed Conflicts (IAC), opposing two or more States, and

◈ Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIAC), between governmental forces and non-governmental armed groups, or between such groups only. IHL treaty law also establishes a distinction between NIAC in the meaning of common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and NIACs falling within the definition provided in Art. 1 of Additional Protocol II​

There has not been a time, since the time of the Palestinian Black Hand (1930s), that there has not been a NIAC that has been operating within the confines of the limits of the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine (1922) applied. Today, there are a half-dozen significant non-governmental armed groups within the limits of that demarcation.

(SPECIFICALLY)

To say that "Palestine has never had an army so it has never been at war" is to disseminate misinformation.


Most Respectfully,
R

It has always been foreign military attacking Palestinian civilians.

That’s odd. Arabs-Moslems have a different view.

The Avalon Project : Hamas Covenant 1988