GOP Congressman Steve King Faces Backlash for Asking Kamala Harris if She Is Descended From 'Slaves or Slave Owners'

What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.

yet slavery was abolished 148 years ago so actual victims of what ?
Some people like to believe that blacks in 2020 commit significantly higher rates of crime and fail academically because of slavery.

Nope
Its genetic.
If it’s genetic then light-skinned would commit less crime than dark-skinned.
Since that is true ,what is your point?
You have data that demonstrates that the lighter the blackness the less the crime?
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.

yet slavery was abolished 148 years ago so actual victims of what ?
Some people like to believe that blacks in 2020 commit significantly higher rates of crime and fail academically because of slavery.

Nope
Its genetic.
If it’s genetic then light-skinned would commit less crime than dark-skinned.
Since that is true ,what is your point?
You have data that demonstrates that the lighter the blackness the less the crime?
Yes. Chicago. Check it out.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.

yet slavery was abolished 148 years ago so actual victims of what ?
Some people like to believe that blacks in 2020 commit significantly higher rates of crime and fail academically because of slavery.

Nope
Its genetic.
If it’s genetic then light-skinned would commit less crime than dark-skinned.
Since that is true ,what is your point?
You have data that demonstrates that the lighter the blackness the less the crime?
Yes. Chicago. Check it out.
You have documentation that delineates by shades of blackness?
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Actually what King proves is that Harris is a descendant of a white man who raped his slaves and they had children. If you want to look at a affirmative action contrivance, look at the white woman you married since they are the ones who have benefitted the most from the policy.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.

yet slavery was abolished 148 years ago so actual victims of what ?
Some people like to believe that blacks in 2020 commit significantly higher rates of crime and fail academically because of slavery.

Nope
Its genetic.
If it’s genetic then light-skinned would commit less crime than dark-skinned.
Since that is true ,what is your point?
You have data that demonstrates that the lighter the blackness the less the crime?
Yes. Chicago. Check it out.
There is no such data.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.

yet slavery was abolished 148 years ago so actual victims of what ?
Some people like to believe that blacks in 2020 commit significantly higher rates of crime and fail academically because of slavery.
Nobody believes that but dumb ass whites. Blacks do not commit significantly higher rates of crime and do not fail academically any more than whites. This forum is a prime example of dumb white people.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.

yet slavery was abolished 148 years ago so actual victims of what ?
Some people like to believe that blacks in 2020 commit significantly higher rates of crime and fail academically because of slavery.

Nope
Its genetic.
If it’s genetic then light-skinned would commit less crime than dark-skinned.
Since that is true ,what is your point?
You have data that demonstrates that the lighter the blackness the less the crime?
Yes. Chicago. Check it out.
You have documentation that delineates by shades of blackness?
Yes. The Chicago Tribune. Just compare the Murder rate between South Chicago with the North. Or better yet ,try South Central LA as compared with Venice.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.

yet slavery was abolished 148 years ago so actual victims of what ?
Some people like to believe that blacks in 2020 commit significantly higher rates of crime and fail academically because of slavery.

Nope
Its genetic.
If it’s genetic then light-skinned would commit less crime than dark-skinned.
Since that is true ,what is your point?
You have data that demonstrates that the lighter the blackness the less the crime?
Yes. Chicago. Check it out.
You have documentation that delineates by shades of blackness?
Yes. The Chicago Tribune. Just compare the Murder rate between South Chicago with the North. Or better yet ,try South Central LA as compared with Venice.
Region in Chicago doesn’t determine depth of skin tone.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.

That is why reparations and affirmative action are immoral
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.

That is why reparations and affirmative action are immoral
The stigma of black skin is what's immoral. It has to stop.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.

That is why reparations and affirmative action are immoral
The stigma of black skin is what's immoral. It has to stop.
It will eventually die a natural death which is the only way it can stop
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.

That is why reparations and affirmative action are immoral
The stigma of black skin is what's immoral. It has to stop.
You need to replace stigma with focus.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....

I agree that one's ancestry and heritage ought not be relevant to one's qualifications in the present.

What makes it relevant here is that the literal whore Kamala Harris has been fraudulently claiming a common heritage, a common ancestry, with black Americans, when in fact, she has no part at all in that heritage or ancestry, but rather in the heritage and ancestry of those who enslaved and abused black.

If ancestry and heritage mattered in the way that the whore is trying to make it matter, then black Americans ought to view her solidly as an enemy, and not as an ally.
 
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.

Everyone who isn't blind can see that that is bullshit.

Her skin is no blacker than mine.

I do not think that the whore Kamala Harris has even a bit of black DNA in her. She certainly does not look like anything other than 100% Caucasian, notwithstanding that her mother is known to have been from India and to have been of the ethnicity that is dominant there.

EveryoneLaughingAtYou.png
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....

I agree that one's ancestry and heritage ought not be relevant to one's qualifications in the present.

What makes it relevant here is that the literal whore Kamala Harris has been fraudulently claiming a common heritage, a common ancestry, with black Americans, when in fact, she has no part at all in that heritage or ancestry, but rather in the heritage and ancestry of those who enslaved and abused black.

If ancestry and heritage mattered in the way that the whore is trying to make it matter, then black Americans ought to view her solidly as an enemy, and not as an ally.
She is an American, born and raised in Oakland, California. She is black.

End of story.
 
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....

I agree that one's ancestry and heritage ought not be relevant to one's qualifications in the present.

What makes it relevant here is that the literal whore Kamala Harris has been fraudulently claiming a common heritage, a common ancestry, with black Americans, when in fact, she has no part at all in that heritage or ancestry, but rather in the heritage and ancestry of those who enslaved and abused black.

If ancestry and heritage mattered in the way that the whore is trying to make it matter, then black Americans ought to view her solidly as an enemy, and not as an ally.
She is an American, born and raised in Oakland, California. She is black.

End of story.

She's not
 

Forum List

Back
Top