Good vs Evil (why evil will win)

Evil wins because it has no integrity and will do whatever it takes. For example:
biden-mail-in-ballot-bailout.jpg
Cat, I learned of a fellow who put up $100,000 for rewards in five states of $20,000 each for information leading to the arrest and conviction of conspirators who placed illegal ballots in remote collection boxes during the 2020 presidential election. He offered to put the $100K in a trust fund to be managed by Fox News or whomever would publicize it and make the awards from his trust fund after conviction(s).
 
Why evil will win is because of the misconception that we are intelligent creatures. That's when our intelligence predominates in relation to other creatures only. That is we are not predominately intelligent creatures ourselves. We are primarily emotional creatures. And it is these soft emotions that the Left represents, and is why the Left will win. Why should it matter then if our soft side wins out? Because emotionalists are soft and vulnerable to the megalomaniac types that gravitate up (and is why the left has such a bad record of bloodshed over history) and take over whenever dictatorships form. With democratization underway all over the world, and democracy allowing for the ultimate dictatorship, there is very little we can do to prevent the primary target of the left, the male, from being eliminated. And, with rationality being represented by less than 5% of the people but being something of itself hard to quantify, there may still be hope. Should we fail, the future, the 'Dyke Age', one of Bulldykes (used descriptively) and Barbie Dolls, being the terminal period of history.
 
It wouldn't make a lot of sense to go along to a Mixed Martial Arts contest with the aim of recruiting members for a chess team, would it. Being at a philosophy forum and trying to engage rationalists would at first glance appear to be a lot easier quest. But it isn't. Why? Because wherever we have Left and Right divides we can't really expect rational behavior. Does it make sense that half the population gets it right, the other half wrong? No. Both sides need to be wrong, their outlooks a product of determinism, with only a small (5%) of the population being rational, and that one in twenty ratio can not exist where right and left are anyone's pre-determined traits. Freethinkers would be transients here. Maybe one in one hundred visitors. But if there is by chance one about, then accept the challenge this thread represents. I've had little formal education and it should be easy to refute just about anything I say. So, try this: A woman is standing on the porch holding a baby, in the front yard her partner is repairing their lawn mower. "It's a good thing you married a mechanic" the partner exclaims. With these parameters, what are the chances of their baby being a girl? If you answer this correctly, then you have some chance of showing me I'm wrong in the OP of this thread. And, reading this and not responding is let's face it an act of intellectual dishonesty. You can anonymously read, but then cowardly avoid replying? If you solve this quiz, then you have been down the same road as myself. But if you don't then you can hardly dismiss what it is I claim.
 
No one has accepted the challenge, meaning there is only one rational person here; if not, those persons are too dishonest and cowardly to respond. So, is it that we live a deterministic existence, and some of us just set to contemplate free will because this too is predetermined to happen?

We live in societies dominated by two monsters, the Left and the Right. The Left, the biggest of the two and consequently set to be victorious by eliminating the Right, something we see happening in front of us. With the superior X factor behind it, the Left can't be stopped? Or can rationality come out of the woods and do battle? Could the Right somehow fight back using the tradition of a military coup? Not likely!

It might look on the surface like it will take twenty years before the US has a female president? But if we look again it could only be a matter of a few years if their President Joe Biden is unable to continue, Vice President Karmala Harris set to take his place and from there be re-elected, a victory by chance from the 'X' factor?

Can we break free of determinism and exercise a genuine free will averting the disastrous consequences of failing to do this. The Left has a shocking track record of bloodshed, including the death of over 600 thousand (predominately white) males when it fought against the Right in the US Civil War. And with around 4 billion males to be eliminated in now what is a subtle, non-military conflict, shouldn't we be doing a little bit more than sitting around debating what is so obviously set to happen?
 
Last edited:
The non-expert voter's choice, non-expert politicians, have no chance up against the forces of nature. Nature decides all until we put real experts in charge, something that should not be too hard to do with the advent of the internet. And if we decide to do nothing then natural outcomes will result, the premature death of half the population within the next century, four billion people. It can't happen, your opiated humanist outlook decides? That's in face of the reality that the real figure would be 8 billion dead in that same time as a result of the catastrophe of age-related death.

The Queen is dead the point of no return is reached. I'd estimated that the queen could reign for no more than two years after her partner of 75 years, Prince Phillip, had also passed. With the Queen's passing the last chance to make needed changes to democracy also passes. What to do now?
 
With Putin and King Charles set to eventually fall, their demise a legacy of a white male status. Kamala Harris's rise set to emulate Liz Truss, leadership by default in what is a precursor to the female-only world of tomorrow. With the death of a white female queen (ironically) ending our last hope we are now past the point of no return. The war is lost but a battle continues scenario, obliged as patriarchs to continue the fighting. But where is this happening? Are there forums? This can't be it? What a pathetic stand if it is.
 
Last edited:
With no consciously gendercidal group yet to assemble, the polarization of society Left and Right, and consequential two-party systems of government worldwide need explaining. The 'X' chromosome, personified by the pure form female, in its attempt to ride itself of the carrier of the 'Y' chromosome, the mutant male, becomes that explanation. The democratic election process being a political extension ironically of the influence of our X chromosome and set to carry out its bidding.

Can the outnumbered 'Y' fight back? No! Its bearers now a bunch of gutless wimps sitting in front of laptops as comfortable as anyone sitting in a chair needs to be, deserving defeat and elimination, all they do is cry.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top