Global Warming of 1.5C

Crick

Gold Member
May 10, 2014
27,857
5,280
290
N/A
"An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pe-industrial levels and related greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty."

The IPCC has released a report during the workup towards AR6 with inputs from all three Working Groups and including a Summary for Policy Makers (SPM). I aim this thread at those who consistently express concern about the cost of measures to reduce GHG emissions and those who minimize the magnitude of the the threat.

The full report may be viewed at Global Warming of 1.5 ºC —

Below are the opening bullets to the SPM

Understanding Global Warming of 1.5°C4
A.1 Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming5 above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence) (Figure SPM.1) {1.2}

A.1.1 Reflecting the long-term warming trend since pre-industrial times, observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) for the decade 2006–2015 was 0.87°C (likely between 0.75°C and 0.99°C)6 higher than the average over the 1850–1900 period (very high confidence). Estimated anthropogenic global warming matches the level of observed warming to within ±20% (likely range). Estimated anthropogenic global warming is currently increasing at 0.2°C (likely between 0.1°C and 0.3°C) per decade due to past and ongoing emissions (high confidence). {1.2.1, Table 1.1, 1.2.4}

A.1.2 Warming greater than the global annual average is being experienced in many land regions and seasons, including two to three times higher in the Arctic. Warming is generally higher over land than over the ocean. (high confidence) {1.2.1, 1.2.2, Figure 1.1, Figure 1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2}

A.1.3 Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence). This assessment is based on several lines of evidence, including attribution studies for changes in extremes since 1950. {3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3}
 
"An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pe-industrial levels and related greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty."

The IPCC has released a report during the workup towards AR6 with inputs from all three Working Groups and including a Summary for Policy Makers (SPM). I aim this thread at those who consistently express concern about the cost of measures to reduce GHG emissions and those who minimize the magnitude of the the threat.

The full report may be viewed at Global Warming of 1.5 ºC —

Below are the opening bullets to the SPM

Understanding Global Warming of 1.5°C4
A.1 Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming5 above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence) (Figure SPM.1) {1.2}

A.1.1 Reflecting the long-term warming trend since pre-industrial times, observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) for the decade 2006–2015 was 0.87°C (likely between 0.75°C and 0.99°C)6 higher than the average over the 1850–1900 period (very high confidence). Estimated anthropogenic global warming matches the level of observed warming to within ±20% (likely range). Estimated anthropogenic global warming is currently increasing at 0.2°C (likely between 0.1°C and 0.3°C) per decade due to past and ongoing emissions (high confidence). {1.2.1, Table 1.1, 1.2.4}

A.1.2 Warming greater than the global annual average is being experienced in many land regions and seasons, including two to three times higher in the Arctic. Warming is generally higher over land than over the ocean. (high confidence) {1.2.1, 1.2.2, Figure 1.1, Figure 1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2}

A.1.3 Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence). This assessment is based on several lines of evidence, including attribution studies for changes in extremes since 1950. {3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3}

Oh look another attempt to debase good science research with a bunch of unfalsifiable climate models, that are assumptions/estimated without real data and far into the future.

Why do you keep ignoring The Scientific Method?

Why do you get so easily smitten with unfalsifiable claims?
 
IPCC.....

lolrofl.jpg
 
"An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pe-industrial levels and related greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty."

The IPCC has released a report during the workup towards AR6 with inputs from all three Working Groups and including a Summary for Policy Makers (SPM). I aim this thread at those who consistently express concern about the cost of measures to reduce GHG emissions and those who minimize the magnitude of the the threat.

The full report may be viewed at Global Warming of 1.5 ºC —

Below are the opening bullets to the SPM

Understanding Global Warming of 1.5°C4
A.1 Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming5 above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence) (Figure SPM.1) {1.2}

A.1.1 Reflecting the long-term warming trend since pre-industrial times, observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) for the decade 2006–2015 was 0.87°C (likely between 0.75°C and 0.99°C)6 higher than the average over the 1850–1900 period (very high confidence). Estimated anthropogenic global warming matches the level of observed warming to within ±20% (likely range). Estimated anthropogenic global warming is currently increasing at 0.2°C (likely between 0.1°C and 0.3°C) per decade due to past and ongoing emissions (high confidence). {1.2.1, Table 1.1, 1.2.4}

A.1.2 Warming greater than the global annual average is being experienced in many land regions and seasons, including two to three times higher in the Arctic. Warming is generally higher over land than over the ocean. (high confidence) {1.2.1, 1.2.2, Figure 1.1, Figure 1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2}

A.1.3 Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence). This assessment is based on several lines of evidence, including attribution studies for changes in extremes since 1950. {3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3}
Is that your explanation as to why the Little Ice Age ended in the 19th century?

Thank God it happened.
 
For a start...

o The global climate has changed relative to the pre-industrial period, and there are multiple lines of evidence that these changes have had impacts on organisms and ecosystems, as well as on human systems and well-being (high confidence)

o Human-induced global warming has already caused multiple observed changes in the climate system (high confidence).

o Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence).

o Several regional changes in climate are assessed to occur with global warming up to 1.5°C as compared to pre-industrial levels, including warming of extreme temperatures in many regions (high confidence)

o There is no single ‘1.5°C warmer world’ (high confidence).

o Robust1 global differences in temperature means and extremes are expected if global warming reaches 1.5°C versus 2°C above the pre-industrial levels (high confidence)

o Climate models project robust1 differences in regional climate between present-day and global warming up to 1.5°C2 , and between 1.5°C and 2°C2 (high confidence), depending on the variable and region in question (high confidence). Large, robust and widespread differences are expected for temperature extremes (high confidence)

o Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would limit risks of increases in heavy precipitation events on a global scale and in several regions compared to conditions at 2°C global warming (medium confidence).

o Limiting global warming to 1.5°C is expected to substantially reduce the probability of extreme drought, precipitation deficits, and risks associated with water availability (i.e., water stress) in some regions (medium confidence)

o Risks to natural and human systems are expected to be lower at 1.5°C than at 2°C of global warming (high confidence).

See the Executive Summary for elaboration on these points and more.
 
For a start...

o The global climate has changed relative to the pre-industrial period, and there are multiple lines of evidence that these changes have had impacts on organisms and ecosystems, as well as on human systems and well-being (high confidence)

o Human-induced global warming has already caused multiple observed changes in the climate system (high confidence).

o Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence).

o Several regional changes in climate are assessed to occur with global warming up to 1.5°C as compared to pre-industrial levels, including warming of extreme temperatures in many regions (high confidence)

o There is no single ‘1.5°C warmer world’ (high confidence).

o Robust1 global differences in temperature means and extremes are expected if global warming reaches 1.5°C versus 2°C above the pre-industrial levels (high confidence)

o Climate models project robust1 differences in regional climate between present-day and global warming up to 1.5°C2 , and between 1.5°C and 2°C2 (high confidence), depending on the variable and region in question (high confidence). Large, robust and widespread differences are expected for temperature extremes (high confidence)

o Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would limit risks of increases in heavy precipitation events on a global scale and in several regions compared to conditions at 2°C global warming (medium confidence).

o Limiting global warming to 1.5°C is expected to substantially reduce the probability of extreme drought, precipitation deficits, and risks associated with water availability (i.e., water stress) in some regions (medium confidence)

o Risks to natural and human systems are expected to be lower at 1.5°C than at 2°C of global warming (high confidence).

See the Executive Summary for elaboration on these points and more.
Is that why Obama bought a mansion on the beach, rising oceans?
 
Oh look another attempt to debase good science research with a bunch of unfalsifiable climate models, that are assumptions/estimated without real data and far into the future.

Why do you keep ignoring The Scientific Method?

Why do you get so easily smitten with unfalsifiable claims?

What claims do you believe to be unfalsifiable?
 
"An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pe-industrial levels and related greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty."

The IPCC has released a report during the workup towards AR6 with inputs from all three Working Groups and including a Summary for Policy Makers (SPM). I aim this thread at those who consistently express concern about the cost of measures to reduce GHG emissions and those who minimize the magnitude of the the threat.

The full report may be viewed at Global Warming of 1.5 ºC —

Below are the opening bullets to the SPM

Understanding Global Warming of 1.5°C4
A.1 Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming5 above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence) (Figure SPM.1) {1.2}

A.1.1 Reflecting the long-term warming trend since pre-industrial times, observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) for the decade 2006–2015 was 0.87°C (likely between 0.75°C and 0.99°C)6 higher than the average over the 1850–1900 period (very high confidence). Estimated anthropogenic global warming matches the level of observed warming to within ±20% (likely range). Estimated anthropogenic global warming is currently increasing at 0.2°C (likely between 0.1°C and 0.3°C) per decade due to past and ongoing emissions (high confidence). {1.2.1, Table 1.1, 1.2.4}

A.1.2 Warming greater than the global annual average is being experienced in many land regions and seasons, including two to three times higher in the Arctic. Warming is generally higher over land than over the ocean. (high confidence) {1.2.1, 1.2.2, Figure 1.1, Figure 1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2}

A.1.3 Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence). This assessment is based on several lines of evidence, including attribution studies for changes in extremes since 1950. {3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3}

Oh look another attempt to debase good science research with a bunch of unfalsifiable climate models, that are assumptions/estimated without real data and far into the future.

Why do you keep ignoring The Scientific Method?

Why do you get so easily smitten with unfalsifiable claims?
Oh look.... Shiny object.....

Crick likes to tout things without using any cognitive thought... If the IPCC says its true he runs with it and fails to think for himself.. All but one of the pontificates can be shown certifiably false and the last one is so veg no one can prove or disprove it.

Everything the paper spouts is from a model that has no predictive power.. thus its garbage...
 
"An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pe-industrial levels and related greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty."

The IPCC has released a report during the workup towards AR6 with inputs from all three Working Groups and including a Summary for Policy Makers (SPM). I aim this thread at those who consistently express concern about the cost of measures to reduce GHG emissions and those who minimize the magnitude of the the threat.

The full report may be viewed at Global Warming of 1.5 ºC —

Below are the opening bullets to the SPM

Understanding Global Warming of 1.5°C4
A.1 Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming5 above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence) (Figure SPM.1) {1.2}

A.1.1 Reflecting the long-term warming trend since pre-industrial times, observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) for the decade 2006–2015 was 0.87°C (likely between 0.75°C and 0.99°C)6 higher than the average over the 1850–1900 period (very high confidence). Estimated anthropogenic global warming matches the level of observed warming to within ±20% (likely range). Estimated anthropogenic global warming is currently increasing at 0.2°C (likely between 0.1°C and 0.3°C) per decade due to past and ongoing emissions (high confidence). {1.2.1, Table 1.1, 1.2.4}

A.1.2 Warming greater than the global annual average is being experienced in many land regions and seasons, including two to three times higher in the Arctic. Warming is generally higher over land than over the ocean. (high confidence) {1.2.1, 1.2.2, Figure 1.1, Figure 1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2}

A.1.3 Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence). This assessment is based on several lines of evidence, including attribution studies for changes in extremes since 1950. {3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3}

Forgot something s0n....you cant predict future climate using computer models. Well.....so says the IPCC anyway. Think it's kinda material to your post don't ya think?:2up::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:
 
Last edited:
We cannot explain why the Earth got warm during the MWP, why it cooled during the LIA, or why it warmed again to 1950.

But apparently we can categorically state that all the warming since then is mankind's fault.

I call bullshit.

The climate anomalies you mention are not thought to be global events. So much for "the Earth got warm", or "cooled", for that matter.

You may wish to brush up on that, here, for instance.

There is not yet a full explanation for that, which is unsurprising given the lack of a contemporary global network of temperature measurements. Now that this network exists, and science has progressed a bit since the MWP, researchers state with high confidence that we're heading into a period of human-induced warming. So much for "categorical".

You shouldn't be calling "bullshit" while you still have a lot to learn about the goings-on, or so I find.
 
For a start...

o The global climate has changed relative to the pre-industrial period, and there are multiple lines of evidence that these changes have had impacts on organisms and ecosystems, as well as on human systems and well-being (high confidence)

o Human-induced global warming has already caused multiple observed changes in the climate system (high confidence).

o Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence).

o Several regional changes in climate are assessed to occur with global warming up to 1.5°C as compared to pre-industrial levels, including warming of extreme temperatures in many regions (high confidence)

o There is no single ‘1.5°C warmer world’ (high confidence).

o Robust1 global differences in temperature means and extremes are expected if global warming reaches 1.5°C versus 2°C above the pre-industrial levels (high confidence)

o Climate models project robust1 differences in regional climate between present-day and global warming up to 1.5°C2 , and between 1.5°C and 2°C2 (high confidence), depending on the variable and region in question (high confidence). Large, robust and widespread differences are expected for temperature extremes (high confidence)

o Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would limit risks of increases in heavy precipitation events on a global scale and in several regions compared to conditions at 2°C global warming (medium confidence).

o Limiting global warming to 1.5°C is expected to substantially reduce the probability of extreme drought, precipitation deficits, and risks associated with water availability (i.e., water stress) in some regions (medium confidence)

o Risks to natural and human systems are expected to be lower at 1.5°C than at 2°C of global warming (high confidence).

See the Executive Summary for elaboration on these points and more.
Is that why Obama bought a mansion on the beach, rising oceans?
No. Pre-rising interest rates
 
We cannot explain why the Earth got warm during the MWP, why it cooled during the LIA, or why it warmed again to 1950.

But apparently we can categorically state that all the warming since then is mankind's fault.

I call bullshit.
And I call you an idiot. The laws of physics are quite plain on the absorption spectra of the GHGs.
 
We cannot explain why the Earth got warm during the MWP, why it cooled during the LIA, or why it warmed again to 1950.

But apparently we can categorically state that all the warming since then is mankind's fault.

I call bullshit.

The climate anomalies you mention are not thought to be global events. So much for "the Earth got warm", or "cooled", for that matter.

You may wish to brush up on that, here, for instance.

There is not yet a full explanation for that, which is unsurprising given the lack of a contemporary global network of temperature measurements. Now that this network exists, and science has progressed a bit since the MWP, researchers state with high confidence that we're heading into a period of human-induced warming. So much for "categorical".

You shouldn't be calling "bullshit" while you still have a lot to learn about the goings-on, or so I find.

Actually, I have 'brushed up' on those things and many more.

Many areas of climate science have acted more like lawyers than scientists. It is easy to make a case for a specific position when you only select evidence than supports it while handwaving away contradictory or inconclusive data.
 
We cannot explain why the Earth got warm during the MWP, why it cooled during the LIA, or why it warmed again to 1950.

But apparently we can categorically state that all the warming since then is mankind's fault.

I call bullshit.
And I call you an idiot. The laws of physics are quite plain on the absorption spectra of the GHGs.

No one here has championed the absorption spectra of GHGs more than me.

But there are many other factors to account for.

I seem to piss off the extremists of both the warmers and the deniers. I must be doing something right.
 
"An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pe-industrial levels and related greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty."

The IPCC has released a report during the workup towards AR6 with inputs from all three Working Groups and including a Summary for Policy Makers (SPM). I aim this thread at those who consistently express concern about the cost of measures to reduce GHG emissions and those who minimize the magnitude of the the threat.

The full report may be viewed at Global Warming of 1.5 ºC —

Below are the opening bullets to the SPM

Understanding Global Warming of 1.5°C4
A.1 Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming5 above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence) (Figure SPM.1) {1.2}

A.1.1 Reflecting the long-term warming trend since pre-industrial times, observed global mean surface temperature (GMST) for the decade 2006–2015 was 0.87°C (likely between 0.75°C and 0.99°C)6 higher than the average over the 1850–1900 period (very high confidence). Estimated anthropogenic global warming matches the level of observed warming to within ±20% (likely range). Estimated anthropogenic global warming is currently increasing at 0.2°C (likely between 0.1°C and 0.3°C) per decade due to past and ongoing emissions (high confidence). {1.2.1, Table 1.1, 1.2.4}

A.1.2 Warming greater than the global annual average is being experienced in many land regions and seasons, including two to three times higher in the Arctic. Warming is generally higher over land than over the ocean. (high confidence) {1.2.1, 1.2.2, Figure 1.1, Figure 1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2}

A.1.3 Trends in intensity and frequency of some climate and weather extremes have been detected over time spans during which about 0.5°C of global warming occurred (medium confidence). This assessment is based on several lines of evidence, including attribution studies for changes in extremes since 1950. {3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3}

Forgot something s0n....you cant predict future climate using computer models. Well.....so says the IPCC anyway. Think it's kinda material to your post don't ya think?:2up::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:

You mean like this?

DpkEpO0VAAEU7B-.jpg
 
You mean like this?

DpkEpO0VAAEU7B-.jpg

The non-link link generates a 404 error.

But, let's assume it's a genuine quote. Please state, in your own terms, what it means, and pay close attention to the meaning of "climate state" in your elaboration. Thanks in advance!
 

Forum List

Back
Top