What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Global Warming Liars

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
3,767
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson
Is there a scientific organization that you can cite which supports your view or not?
If it’s not, can you explain why.

Any and all colleges and universities around the world who use Halliday/Resnick's Fundamentals of Physics textbook for incoming freshmen science students ... all of them support that there are laws that all things must follow ... one of which is that energy moves toward equilibrium ...

Prove that it’s not happening.

Global temperatures are down for 2021 ... that's certainly proves the runaway greenhouse effect is not happening ... see, things aren't running away ...

=====

Do you have any formal education in science, any science? ... your questions are completely naive ... it's for you to prove your claim or withdraw it ... or you're a liar ...
 

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
18,537
Reaction score
4,821
Points
170
Any and all colleges and universities around the world who use Halliday/Resnick's Fundamentals of Physics textbook for incoming freshmen science students ... all of them support that there are laws that all things must follow ... one of which is that energy moves toward equilibrium ...



Global temperatures are down for 2021 ... that's certainly proves the runaway greenhouse effect is not happening ... see, things aren't running away ...

=====

Do you have any formal education in science, any science? ... your questions are completely naive ... it's for you to prove your claim or withdraw it ... or you're a liar ...
Down from what?

And still looking for the organization?
 

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
3,767
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson

flan327

Silver Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2021
Messages
2,853
Reaction score
748
Points
98
It's a global scam & has been going on for over 100 years.
They still get some low info types to buy in but most people still just laugh at them. That's why they have been going after kids with this for the past 2 decades.
People are getting rich off this grift & now they want to use it to crash the world for a reset

And here come the bed wetters to tell us why clouds are so scary

View attachment 663422
Wear Depends
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
17,608
Reaction score
2,563
Points
290
Location
N/A
Global temperatures are down for 2021 ... that's certainly proves the runaway greenhouse effect is not happening ... see, things aren't running away ...

Bullshit
1659815864746.png


Here are monthly comparisons between 2019, 20, 21 and 2022 through Jun. (Monthly average temperature United States 2022 | Statista) Just comparing 2022 to 2021, we can see that January March, April and June were lower than 21 while February and May were higher. 2022 still measures in the top ten warmest of all years since the invention of the thermometer. So, any claim that temperatures have taken any sort of significant decline - ie, signifying a change in the pattern we've experienced for the last 50 years, is simple, ignorant bullshit, ie, your usual.

1659816134175.png


I'm not a climate scientist but I think that if you actually want to suggest that the warming trend produced by human GHG emissions since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution has ended and the world is beginning to grow cooler, I'd say you need to show a consistent decline of about 1C degree over a period of at least 15-20 years. Telling us that temperatures have declined this month so AGW is refuted is just more simple, ignorant bullshit.
 
Last edited:

johngaltshrugged

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
3,415
Reaction score
6,587
Points
1,938
Wear Depends
Why? Does that help you? How often does yours fill? Is it embarrassing when you leak in the safe space?
I imagine the odor is horrifying but good for you to at least try.
Do you eat too much bran, klan?
TMI
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
79,363
Reaction score
22,666
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
If AGW was real then there would be no reason to fake data, which they have been caught doing numerous times. In addition every once in awhile maybe some of their predictions would come true, which we never see.

Hey, Mike's Nature Trick is perfectly legitimate!!!

DURR
 

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
3,767
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson
Bullshit
View attachment 678743

Here are monthly comparisons between 2019, 20, 21 and 2022 through Jun. (Monthly average temperature United States 2022 | Statista) Just comparing 2022 to 2021, we can see that January March, April and June were lower than 21 while February and May were higher. 2022 still measures in the top ten warmest of all years since the invention of the thermometer. So, any claim that temperatures have taken any sort of significant decline - ie, signifying a change in the pattern we've experienced for the last 50 years, is simple, ignorant bullshit, ie, your usual.

View attachment 678746

I'm not a climate scientist but I think that if you actually want to suggest that the warming trend produced by human GHG emissions since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution has ended and the world is beginning to grow cooler, I'd say you need to show a consistent decline of about 1C degree over a period of at least 15-20 years. Telling us that temperatures have declined this month so AGW is refuted is just more simple, ignorant bullshit.

How are you evidencing a runaway greenhouse effect? ... and where does AGW Theory demand this runaway effect? ...

This is a strawman argument ... I've always agreed the Earth is warming and I've always agreed Man contributes to this effect ... where we disagree is whether catastrophic events will happen because of the warming ... I don't believe in hypercanes, that's your nightmare not mine ...

Otto105 posted a link advocating a runaway greenhouse effect ... evaporating water causes more water to evaporate ... hotter and hotter and hotter without end ... a positive feedback mechanism ... my point was any drop in temperature coupled with increasing CO2 is proof-positive there's no ongoing runaway greenhouse effect ...

You're right you're not a climate scientist, you haven't even taken a class in meteorology ... if you've taken physics, then you know the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics fully discredits otto105's position, or at least the position in the link he's defending ...

Maybe you haven't taken physics? ...
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
79,363
Reaction score
22,666
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
Where'd you ever get the gall to suggest you have an engineering degree?

1) That water vapor has a greater greenhouse effect than does CO2 does not mean that CO2 is irrelevant. Water vapor levels are not changing, CO2 levels are. The increase in CO2 and methane are the primary cause of the warming experienced since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.
2) VERY close to 100% of the CO2 added to the atmosphere since 1850 is of human origin. Your statement in red there is absolutely FALSE.

Water vapor levels are not changing, CO2 levels are.


1659834029357.png

 

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
3,767
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson
Water vapor levels are not changing, CO2 levels are.


View attachment 678822

It takes 2,260 joules of energy to evaporate one gram of water ... it takes 1 joule of energy to heat one gram of air one degree Celsius ... math anyone ... condense one gram of water and we heat one gram of air to 2,257ºC ... melts iron ...

I'm I the only one who's taken chemistry class? ...
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
28,003
Reaction score
15,905
Points
1,445
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
BWHAAAAAAAaaaaaa The Climate Reality Project.. A far-left wing socialist group that doesn't understand the science... I love that they are touting failed Global Climate Modeling (GCM) as their "source" of proof.. Not empirical evidence, but a model that fails inside 10 days. LOL...

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

You have no idea what the climate sensitivity number is or what it represents.

Here is some very basic science that should help you understand what it is and why it is not doing what you think it is doing.

 

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
18,537
Reaction score
4,821
Points
170
I love it when you knuckle draggers cheer each other like little school girls.

Still quoting lord muckington and some scientists think laughable bullshit.


Why is it that no scientific organization backs your climate denial?
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
17,608
Reaction score
2,563
Points
290
Location
N/A
Any and all colleges and universities around the world who use Halliday/Resnick's Fundamentals of Physics textbook for incoming freshmen science students ... all of them support that there are laws that all things must follow ... one of which is that energy moves toward equilibrium ...



Global temperatures are down for 2021 ... that's certainly proves the runaway greenhouse effect is not happening ... see, things aren't running away ...

=====

Do you have any formal education in science, any science? ... your questions are completely naive ... it's for you to prove your claim or withdraw it ... or you're a liar ...
His request that you provide the name of some scientific organization that agrees with your rejection of AGW was completely reasonable and you completely failed to answer it. And EVERYONE here knows why.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
79,363
Reaction score
22,666
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
His request that you provide the name of some scientific organization that agrees with your rejection of AGW was completely reasonable and you completely failed to answer it. And EVERYONE here knows why.

I'm afraid both values you've given are incorrect. It takes 2,260 joules to raise one gram of water from 0 to 100C. Water will evaporate at any temperature above 0C (like 0.001C) And it takes 4.186 joules of energy to raise one gram of water one degree C. You will not melt iron. Or pass your next exam.

Are you sure? LOL!
 

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
3,767
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson
His request that you provide the name of some scientific organization that agrees with your rejection of AGW was completely reasonable and you completely failed to answer it. And EVERYONE here knows why.

John Wiley and Sons Publishing isn't an organization? ... How about Cambridge University Press:

"The Stefan–Boltzmann law is an example of a negative feedback that stabilizes a planet's climate system. If the Earth received more sunlight it would result in a temporary disequilibrium (more energy in than out) and result in warming. However, because the Stefan–Boltzmann response mandates that this hotter planet emits more energy, eventually a new radiation balance can be reached and the temperature will be maintained at its new, higher value" -- Catling/Kasting 2017

Otto105 in a liar ... and so are you ... now you prove the carbon dioxide portion of AGW Theory is true ... and keep burning coal, you know it's not harming the environment ... you just lie about that ...

Idiots ...
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$225.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top