global warming: "if what we think we can understand is correct"

is global warming a key political issue is to you in this next election ??

  • yes

    Votes: 6 27.3%
  • no

    Votes: 16 72.7%
  • don't care

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    22
the Earth is bigger than any humans, and therefore can overcome any human interference, Earth has done so for billions of years, Earth is still in it's warming stage. scientifically proven, where did the glaciers go ??
that's right, the earth will win, and i'm ok with that.
 
i just heard a JPL scientist say we are able to study and see "if what we think we can understand is correct"
and that will help develop models for the future. Home Page - Deep Space Network
and this is fine, i am really glad they are studying and playing with computer models. i don't want this to replace the space program.

however, when they start pushing global warming as a liberal agenda, that where i step off the train.
if people like al gore use junk science and cooked data to the ends of wealth and power, i have a political problem with that. and i have also rebelled against the using of taxpayer money to use the corporation for public broadcasting to sell this story, especially to our children,

global warming is not a consensus, it's new science, the data is either wrong or inconclusive.
this is going to be a big political football, it's time to look at this objectively. the summit in france coming up will be a whirlwind of political posturing. carbon credits are a joke. they are a vehicle to controlling industry and the economy. let's stay focused on the environment polution and population, and not one more red cent to that fear monger hypocrite al gore.

if what we think we can understand is correct... that will be five billion dollars please.

The Alarming Cost Of Climate Change Hysteria

According to the GAO, annual federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010, amounting to $106.7 billion over that period. The money was spent in four general categories: technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, science to understand climate changes, international assistance for developing countries, and wildlife adaptation to respond to actual or expected changes. Technology spending, the largest category, grew from $2.56 billion to $5.5 billion over this period, increasingly advancing over others in total share. Data compiled by Joanne Novaat the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. This doesn’t count about $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.”

'Dark Money' Funds To Promote Global Warming Alarmism Dwarf Warming 'Denier' Research

money spent studying global warming - Google Search

with all the problems in the world, they are bilking people so we can control the weather ?
what about all the weather people, won't they lose their jobs ?

incidentally, the poll question doesn't ask if you believe in the "science" only if it's a political issue this election for you, it is for me, thanks to people like gore and obama.

i don't think it's a priority or a bigger threat than isis for example, which is far less nebulous and obscure, and politically obfuscated for $$ and political control.


Global Warming is not a "liberal" agenda.

It's science.

Period.
 
i just heard a JPL scientist say we are able to study and see "if what we think we can understand is correct"
and that will help develop models for the future. Home Page - Deep Space Network
and this is fine, i am really glad they are studying and playing with computer models. i don't want this to replace the space program.

however, when they start pushing global warming as a liberal agenda, that where i step off the train.
if people like al gore use junk science and cooked data to the ends of wealth and power, i have a political problem with that. and i have also rebelled against the using of taxpayer money to use the corporation for public broadcasting to sell this story, especially to our children,

global warming is not a consensus, it's new science, the data is either wrong or inconclusive.
this is going to be a big political football, it's time to look at this objectively. the summit in france coming up will be a whirlwind of political posturing. carbon credits are a joke. they are a vehicle to controlling industry and the economy. let's stay focused on the environment polution and population, and not one more red cent to that fear monger hypocrite al gore.

if what we think we can understand is correct... that will be five billion dollars please.

The Alarming Cost Of Climate Change Hysteria

According to the GAO, annual federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010, amounting to $106.7 billion over that period. The money was spent in four general categories: technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, science to understand climate changes, international assistance for developing countries, and wildlife adaptation to respond to actual or expected changes. Technology spending, the largest category, grew from $2.56 billion to $5.5 billion over this period, increasingly advancing over others in total share. Data compiled by Joanne Novaat the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. This doesn’t count about $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.”

'Dark Money' Funds To Promote Global Warming Alarmism Dwarf Warming 'Denier' Research

money spent studying global warming - Google Search

with all the problems in the world, they are bilking people so we can control the weather ?
what about all the weather people, won't they lose their jobs ?

incidentally, the poll question doesn't ask if you believe in the "science" only if it's a political issue this election for you, it is for me, thanks to people like gore and obama.

i don't think it's a priority or a bigger threat than isis for example, which is far less nebulous and obscure, and politically obfuscated for $$ and political control.


Global Warming is not a "liberal" agenda.

It's science.

Period.
it's junk science, there is no consensus, i'm sorry to burst the greenhouse bubble. consensus is the new transparency,
the word has lost it's meaning.
it's man made (contrived) "general" agreement. that's the cult, not the skeptics.
 
Last edited:
If a sceintist wishes to come out against climate change in any way, he can expect career suicide.
If a scientist comes out with a paper that meets scientific protocols and that paper shows Global warming to be false a Nobel Prize would ensue......

I'm not one of those who deny that there may be global warming. In fact, this is happening on other planets in the solar system as well. That does not mean that anyone has proved causation, or if it is causation, it is life threatening to life on earth in any real way.

Now why don't you go create a computer program to prove you right. LOL.
 
If a sceintist wishes to come out against climate change in any way, he can expect career suicide.
If a scientist comes out with a paper that meets scientific protocols and that paper shows Global warming to be false a Nobel Prize would ensue......

.

I'm not one of those who deny that there may be global warming. In fact, this is happening on other planets in the solar system as well. That does not mean that anyone has proved causation, or if it is causation, it is life threatening to life on earth in any real way.
Now why don't you run along and create a computer program to prove you are right and I'll create one that proves I"m right. LOL
 
If what we think we can understand is correct"? Apparently the theory of MMGW isn't important to the candidates. The only one talking about it is socialist Bernie Sanders.
 
If what we think we can understand is correct"? Apparently the theory of MMGW isn't important to the candidates. The only one talking about it is socialist Bernie Sanders.

Bernie is too busy trying to prove to people that Islamic terrorism is due to climate change.

It's idiotic statements like that, that strip him of any credible discourse. I think he is senile or a poor propagandist, I don't know which.

When he is done convincing us that every bad thing that happens to us is caused by global warming, he can then continue to preach about giving us everything for free.

Yea Bernie, we just got sold that same song and dance from Obama. No thanks.
 
If what we think we can understand is correct"? Apparently the theory of MMGW isn't important to the candidates. The only one talking about it is socialist Bernie Sanders.
apparently from this poll the people don't care much either. i'll do another one in a couple of weeks, question posed differently. i just wondered if it was an important political issue for this election. i'm pretty sure i can convince bernie it's all a big hoax.
 
If what we think we can understand is correct"? Apparently the theory of MMGW isn't important to the candidates. The only one talking about it is socialist Bernie Sanders.
apparently from this poll the people don't care much either. i'll do another one in a couple of weeks, question posed differently. i just wondered if it was an important political issue for this election. i'm pretty sure i can convince bernie it's all a big hoax.

Well we just got done seeing what "free health care" under Obama was all about. When will we learn that anything they wish to do to us will dig deep into our pockets and cause us to suffer?
 
If what we think we can understand is correct"? Apparently the theory of MMGW isn't important to the candidates. The only one talking about it is socialist Bernie Sanders.
apparently from this poll the people don't care much either. i'll do another one in a couple of weeks, question posed differently. i just wondered if it was an important political issue for this election. i'm pretty sure i can convince bernie it's all a big hoax.

Well we just got done seeing what "free health care" under Obama was all about. When will we learn that anything they wish to do to us will dig deep into our pockets and cause us to suffer?
it's a big mess, they will either fashion some sort of single payer clash for clunkers type plan or it will go the other way and we'll be able to shop across state lines, which i think this country is all about. bernie wants single payer, which is the opposite of free enterprise.
 
If what we think we can understand is correct"? Apparently the theory of MMGW isn't important to the candidates. The only one talking about it is socialist Bernie Sanders.
apparently from this poll the people don't care much either. i'll do another one in a couple of weeks, question posed differently. i just wondered if it was an important political issue for this election. i'm pretty sure i can convince bernie it's all a big hoax.

Well we just got done seeing what "free health care" under Obama was all about. When will we learn that anything they wish to do to us will dig deep into our pockets and cause us to suffer?
it's a big mess, they will either fashion some sort of single payer clash for clunkers type plan or it will go the other way and we'll be able to shop across state lines, which i think this country is all about. bernie wants single payer, which is the opposite of free enterprise.

It's not just Bernie that wants a single payer.

Every Dim who voted for Obamacare wants a single payer. Obamacare was designed to crash the system in order to pave the way for them to "fix" things again. Notice that Unite Health, one of the largest insurance health care providers, is pulling out of the health insurance business because it is no longer economically feasible.

Soon all that will be left will be the government, and we will all turn into the VA with secret death lists for the very sick and costly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top