Giuliani Leaves Out 9/11

[AmericasBrave58]

Giuliani Claims 'No Domestic Attacks Under Bush' - Sphere News


Giuliani is loonier than a LooneyToon!!! If he thinks, that he can convince Americans, that 9/11, was not under Bush's watch.Bush was our leader,at the time 9/11 happened, in fact he was speaking in front of a group of school children, when they came in and informed him of the bombing.I remember watching it on T.V. the day it happened.

Giuliani!!! "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.IDIOT!!!!

 

[kyzr]

He obviously meant "after 9/11". WTF is the problem w/dems, they try to make a big deal out of a mis-speak.
The point he made is that Bush kept the US safe after 9/11, Obama is making it easier for the terrorists to attack by having a loon like Napolitano in-charge of HS. "The system worked" is wayyyyy more stupid than what Rudy said.

 

[Jay Canuck]

[SIZE=+1]Why do we listen to Rudy?[/SIZE]
"America's mayor" has no credibility left
by Joe Conason
Link Excerpt:
Why does the mainstream news establishment continue to present Rudy “9/11” Giuliani as a leading expert on terrorism and national security? Rather than scrupulous analysis or fresh insight, he offers hyper-partisan spin, unburdened by basic facts or even a working memory. On "Good Morning America," Rudy sought to draw an unflattering comparison between Obama and his predecessor with an outlandish claim. "We had no domestic terror attacks under Bush. We’ve had one under Obama." This is now the Republican propaganda line, insulting to any American of normal intelligence, which only omits the largest terrorist attack ever on American soil – and the event that restored Giuliani’s fortunes and allowed him to mount an ill-fated presidential campaign in 2008. (Sometimes he forgets shoe bomber Richard Reid, and sometimes he pretends that the Reid attempt occurred before 9/11.) It's obvious that Giuliani was responsible for a serious menace to national security, which fortunately was derailed before it could do any real damage: the nomination of Bernard Kerik as secretary of Homeland Security. Consider the security implications of a Cabinet member with ties to organized crime, an outstanding arrest warrant in his home state, and all the other myriad defects of Giuliani’s corrupt former police commissioner -- whom he promoted because of loyalty instead of qualifications or competence.

 

[rdean]

[SIZE=+1]Why do we listen to Rudy?[/SIZE]
"America's mayor" has no credibility left
by Joe Conason
Link Excerpt:
Why does the mainstream news establishment continue to present Rudy “9/11” Giuliani as a leading expert on terrorism and national security? Rather than scrupulous analysis or fresh insight, he offers hyper-partisan spin, unburdened by basic facts or even a working memory. On "Good Morning America," Rudy sought to draw an unflattering comparison between Obama and his predecessor with an outlandish claim. "We had no domestic terror attacks under Bush. We’ve had one under Obama." This is now the Republican propaganda line, insulting to any American of normal intelligence, which only omits the largest terrorist attack ever on American soil – and the event that restored Giuliani’s fortunes and allowed him to mount an ill-fated presidential campaign in 2008. (Sometimes he forgets shoe bomber Richard Reid, and sometimes he pretends that the Reid attempt occurred before 9/11.) It's obvious that Giuliani was responsible for a serious menace to national security, which fortunately was derailed before it could do any real damage: the nomination of Bernard Kerik as secretary of Homeland Security. Consider the security implications of a Cabinet member with ties to organized crime, an outstanding arrest warrant in his home state, and all the other myriad defects of Giuliani’s corrupt former police commissioner -- whom he promoted because of loyalty instead of qualifications or competence.

Democrats know better than to expect political honesty from a Republican Drag Queen.

 

[Jay Canuck]

let's hope he runs in 2012 but who else will be on the ticket?

 

[Jay Canuck]

the shoe bomber is never brought up....and so many Rethugs have said that there was no attacks after 9-11?
I wonder why the media didn't go nuts on that story like the underwear bomber?

 

[Bill O'Olberman]

Although no one was seriously hurt, I am pretty sure had this ( Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar SUV attack - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) happened in 2009 you would have heard Republican chants of terrorist attack, blaming Obama for being soft on domestic terrorism and a closet jihadist, as well as the usual anti-islamic rhetoric.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

He obviously meant "after 9/11". WTF is the problem w/dems, they try to make a big deal out of a mis-speak.
The point he made is that Bush kept the US safe after 9/11, Obama is making it easier for the terrorists to attack by having a loon like Napolitano in-charge of HS. "The system worked" is wayyyyy more stupid than what Rudy said.

Didn't you get the memo? Only democrats are allowed to mis-speak. And they seem to do it with regularity.

 

[Jay Canuck]

He obviously meant "after 9/11". WTF is the problem w/dems, they try to make a big deal out of a mis-speak.
The point he made is that Bush kept the US safe after 9/11, Obama is making it easier for the terrorists to attack by having a loon like Napolitano in-charge of HS. "The system worked" is wayyyyy more stupid than what Rudy said.

Didn't you get the memo? Only democrats are allowed to mis-speak. And they seem to do it with regularity.

ah the stupid and ignorant.....together at last!

 

[beowolfe]

He obviously meant "after 9/11". WTF is the problem w/dems, they try to make a big deal out of a mis-speak.
The point he made is that Bush kept the US safe after 9/11, Obama is making it easier for the terrorists to attack by having a loon like Napolitano in-charge of HS. "The system worked" is wayyyyy more stupid than what Rudy said.

Dude.....how do you know what he 'obviously' meant? He didn't say 'after 9-11'...and it's been since called to his attention and he hasn't changed it. And you guys say libs make excuses for Dims!! You wingnuts are just as excusing of Repugs.