Free Speech for me, but not for Thee

task0778

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2017
12,247
11,350
2,265
Texas hill country

The 2021 College Free Speech Rankings

by FIRE September 21, 2021
  • Largest survey for campus free expression ranks over 150 top colleges
  • Claremont McKenna College #1 for free speech, DePauw worst
  • 66% of students report some level of acceptance for speaker shout-downs — up 4 percentage points from last year; 23% consider it acceptable for people to use violence to stop certain speech — up 5 percentage points from last year
PHILADELPHIA, Sept. 21, 2021 — Prospective college students who want to make sure that their free expression will be protected should consider Claremont McKenna College or the University of Chicago. But if they land at DePauw University or Marquette University, their free speech rights are at serious risk.

That’s because DePauw and Marquette rank dead last in the 2021 College Free Speech Rankings. Presented by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, College Pulse, and RealClearEducation, the rankings assess a school’s free speech climate based upon the opinions of over 37,000 students at 159 of America’s largest and most prestigious campuses — the largest survey of campus free expression ever performed.

“Existing ranking systems don’t look at a core aspect of higher education: the ability to think, discuss, and speak freely,” said FIRE Executive Director Robert Shibley. “Our rankings guide prospective students and their parents toward schools that value free speech and open inquiry. They also help us hold schools accountable and demand they do better.”

The report takes into account the varied dimensions of free expression on campus — from the ability to discuss challenging topics like race, gender dynamics, and geo-political conflicts, to whether students hold back from openly sharing their views. The rankings are designed to help students and parents make enrollment decisions, and score the overall speech climate on each campus.
.
.
“There are fundamental questions that every student should want answered before committing to a college,” said FIRE Senior Research Counsel Adam Goldstein. “The value of higher education comes from developing a fuller understanding of the world by asking questions that challenge the status quo. A college that won’t clearly protect your right to ask those questions is a bad deal, even if it boasts small class sizes or a fancy stadium.”

Colleges are scored on seven main components: openness to discussion of controversial topics, tolerance for liberal speakers, tolerance for conservative speakers, administrative support for free speech, comfort expressing ideas publicly, whether students support disruptive conduct during campus speeches, and FIRE’s speech code rating. Public schools generally performed better than private schools. Only 5 of the bottom 30 schools on the list are public.

Other highlights from the report include:

  • More than 80% of students report self-censoring their viewpoints at their colleges at least some of the time, with 21% saying they censor themselves often.
  • Generally, students showed much greater intolerance for campus speakers with conservative positions.
  • Racial inequality, abortion, and gun control top the list of most difficult subjects to discuss.
  • 66% of students report some level of acceptance for speaker shout-downs (up 4 percentage points from FIRE’s 2020 report) and 23% consider it acceptable for people to use violence to stop certain speech (up 5 percentage points). Two elite women’s colleges, Wellesley College and Barnard College, top this list, supporting the use of violence at 45% and 43% respectively.
  • Only a third of students say that their college administration makes it either very or extremely clear that they will protect free speech on campus.
The data also reveal that students are most uncomfortable expressing their views on social media or when engaging in a public disagreement with a professor.

“The research is clear, and our experience working with these schools confirms it: Much of the campus climate for expression is determined by the administration,” said Sean Stevens, FIRE senior research fellow for polling and analytics. “Staking out a leadership position on free speech and open debate resonates with students and has a real effect on a campus’ climate for free expression.”



Holy shit, Batman! America is not the country it once was, and IMHO is heading down the road in the wrong direction. Funny thing, some people extol diversity but not when it comes to free speech.
 
Academia is raising a generation of Left wing fascists.

More than one generation I think. It's been going on for a long time, but not as prevalent as it is now. It the past, unpopular speakers were still invited to talk, and although sometimes mocked and shouted at, they could and did make their presentation. No doubt there were exceptions, but not like it is now.

And here's the problem as I see it: it used to be said that if you weren't a democrat when you were 20 then you had no heart, and if you weren't a republican when you were 40 the you had no brain. But nowadays, how many young people can think for themselves, or want to? Kids are being trained to be sheep, so that's what they become; how many can change? And some of those kids are now in their 40s and 50s, at least.
 
Once again, this shows that Progressives are modern-day Fascists and The Greater Evil.

Of course Conservatives have enormous faults as well. But those who oppose Freedom are the worst.
 
"Get off my lawn".

Older generations have complained about the younger generations forever.

If all you got out of the OP was the generation gap then you really missed the point. It's actually about freedom of expression, allowing someone else with a different point of view to speak. So, do you think it's okay for anyone to be denied that opportunity based on nothing more than ideology, especially at a college or university that should be teaching critical thinking and allowing different philosophies and politics to be freely discussed.
 
If all you got out of the OP was the generation gap then you really missed the point. It's actually about freedom of expression, allowing someone else with a different point of view to speak. So, do you think it's okay for anyone to be denied that opportunity based on nothing more than ideology, especially at a college or university that should be teaching critical thinking and allowing different philosophies and politics to be freely discussed.

I believe colleges should be places where all viewpoints should be heard but these complaints have been going on for decades.
 

Forum List

Back
Top