Fox News under attack from within News Corp.

DE3

Member
Mar 2, 2010
163
18
16
Sorry if this has already been posted.

Freud fires opening shot in battle for soul of Fox News - Americas, World - The Independent

Freud fires opening shot in battle for soul of Fox News

Future of channel's chief in doubt after withering attack from Murdoch's son-in-law


Rupert Murdoch's son-in-law says family members are "ashamed and sickened" of the mogul's right-wing channel Fox News, in what Murdochologists said could be the opening salvo in a public battle for the soul of America's most-watched news channel.


The attack on Fox by Matthew Freud, the British public relations guru who is married
to Elisabeth Murdoch, caused an immediate sensation in the media industry, as much for the fact that it was made in public as for the strength of the words chosen.

And attention was focusing last night on the future of Fox's combative founder and boss, Roger Ailes, the former aide to Richard Nixon who shaped the channel's coverage in his own image as a right-wing rabble-rouser.

Fox emerged as a counterpoint to the perceived liberal bias of CNN and became the strongest cheerleader for the presidency of George W Bush, under its slogan of "fair and balanced" journalism. Since the election of Barack Obama, the channel has given voice to opponents of the President and was boycotted by the White House over the summer for inflaming protests against proposed healthcare reform.

Agreeing to contribute his thoughts to a New York Times profile of Mr Ailes, Mr Freud stated: "I am by no means alone within the family or the company in being ashamed and sickened by Roger Ailes's horrendous and sustained disregard of the journalistic standards that News Corporation, its founder and every other global media business aspires to."

Mr Ailes has long been rumoured to have a tempestuous personal relationship with Rupert Murdoch, while the mogul's children are known to have substantially more liberal views than those on show on Fox. A recent biography of Mr Murdoch, The Man Who Owns The News by Michael Wolff, described how the mogul's wife, Wendi Deng, persistently urged her husband
to rein in the political coverage on Fox.

Mr Wolff said last night that Mr Freud's statement could only be interpreted as a calculated attempt to put pressure on Mr Ailes. "Matthew Freud, a PR man of extraordinary craftiness, is not going to say anything off the cuff, certainly not that. I have never heard a shoe drop as loud. I don't believe Roger Ailes can continue in this company. Not only has he been told that its controlling shareholders don't want him, but he has been told they think he is despicable. Something has just been set in motion."

Mr Murdoch turns 79 in March, and has long been grooming his children to succeed him in running News Corporation, the family-controlled media giant, where Fox News is increasingly seen as the most valuable journalistic asset. The company also owns The Times, The Sun and BSkyB in the UK, the Wall Street Journal, and Twentieth Century Fox movie studio, among other businesses.

The family's voting rights will eventually be shared amongst Mr Murdoch's adult children. Of the four, only James Murdoch now works for News Corp, overseeing all its European and Asian divisions. Elisabeth currently runs her own TV production business in the UK.

Mr Ailes was paid $23m in salary, bonuses and benefits last year, more than Rupert Murdoch himself. The two men are said to have clashed over Mr Murdoch's flirtation with the idea of endorsing Mr Obama for the presidency last year. In the end, the company's US tabloid, the New York Post, stayed Republican but Mr Murdoch gave political donations to both sides.

Fox News changed the media landscape on its launch in 1996, pioneering an opinionated "shock-jock" style of programming in prime time, overtaking CNN in terms of viewers and reaching an estimated $700m in annual profits. The 69-year-old Mr Ailes told the New York Times that he "built this channel from my life experience" and not out of the mould of a liberal media elite.
 
I reckon it's more about a move on Murdoch within News Ltd than just about FoxNews. He will never retire, he'll go out with printer's ink on his fingers and some of the young 'uns are getting a bit impatient.
 
Mr. Freund married into a very wealthy family - and now wishes to destroy the source of that wealth.

If he gets his way, he will damage Fox the way Pinch Sulzberger has the NYT.
 
Fox does not need to change a damn thing--Freud is so out of line that I would not listen to him on issues related to business.

He is Murdoch "Would live in proverty if it was not for Rupert" Son in law.
 
Look ....you can't hold FoxNews to the journalistic standards you hold other networks to.

Fox tried to be a legitimate news network and failed miserably. The stumbled on the News Entertainment concept and have hit a goldmine with the right wing conservatives. So what if they think it is real news, it gets ratings and makes money
 
Last edited:
Mr. Freund married into a very wealthy family - and now wishes to destroy the source of that wealth.

If he gets his way, he will damage Fox the way Pinch Sulzberger has the NYT.

Murdoch's son as well.

Roger Ailes is another complication for James. In Europe, where James spends much of his time, Ailes and Fox News are mocked and loathed as the worst form of American jingoism.
Politically, James is not liberal—he’s a committed free-market thinker—but Fox’s brand of politics is a problem that, in his view, needs to be managed.

A Look Inside the Life of News Corp. Mogul and Raging Septuagenarian Rupert Murdoch -- New York Magazine
 
Fox does not need to change a damn thing--Freud is so out of line that I would not listen to him on issues related to business.

He is Murdoch "Would live in proverty if it was not for Rupert" Son in law.

He(Freud) owns a good portion of the company.
 
There is an old saying: Shirt Sleeves to Shirt Sleeves in Three Generations.

It would seem that some of the Murdoch heirs are bound and determined to fulfill it.
 
There is an old saying: Shirt Sleeves to Shirt Sleeves in Three Generations.

It would seem that some of the Murdoch heirs are bound and determined to fulfill it.

Rupert isn't exactly thrilled either, but it bankrolls his failed efforts with The Wall Street Journal and The New York Post.
 
Fox does not need to change a damn thing--Freud is so out of line that I would not listen to him on issues related to business.

He is Murdoch "Would live in proverty if it was not for Rupert" Son in law.

From the sounds of it most shareholders, and the rest of the family agree with the son in law. And if you think Fox doesn't need to change, you are a kool aid drinkin moron.
 
I think the more interesting issue is that the owners see a problem with Fox News' journalistic standards, but do the viewers? I doubt they do.
 
Rupert isn't exactly thrilled either, but it bankrolls his failed efforts with The Wall Street Journal and The New York Post.


Failed efforts with the WSJ?

Puh-leeeze - it's one of the few successful newspapers around, with a very successful online subscription business.

I don't follow the NY Post - but would appreciate your source information proving that both efforts are failures.

TYIAFYC.
 
Mr. Freund married into a very wealthy family - and now wishes to destroy the source of that wealth.

If he gets his way, he will damage Fox the way Pinch Sulzberger has the NYT.

Murdoch's son as well.

Roger Ailes is another complication for James. In Europe, where James spends much of his time, Ailes and Fox News are mocked and loathed as the worst form of American jingoism.
Politically, James is not liberal—he’s a committed free-market thinker—but Fox’s brand of politics is a problem that, in his view, needs to be managed.

A Look Inside the Life of News Corp. Mogul and Raging Septuagenarian Rupert Murdoch -- New York Magazine


Sorry, I didn't link the first page of the article.

A Look Inside the Life of News Corp. Mogul and Raging Septuagenarian Rupert Murdoch -- New York Magazine
 
Rupert isn't exactly thrilled either, but it bankrolls his failed efforts with The Wall Street Journal and The New York Post.


Failed efforts with the WSJ?

Puh-leeeze - it's one of the few successful newspapers around, with a very successful online subscription business.

I don't follow the NY Post - but would appreciate your source information proving that both efforts are failures.

TYIAFYC.

He paid $5 billion. They are taking a $3 billion write down this year. It is in the Nymag article I posted above.

One of the quotes from a NEws Corp. exec. is "The Journal was the worst deal Rupert has ever done."
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top