Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fox News Projects Owens to win, Republicans lose a Century Old Seat. Sarah Palin's midas touch failed to work.
YouTube - Fleetwood Mac - Don't Stop
Actually, this is the best way it could turn out for the Republican Party. If Hoffman had won a squeaker in a district that has been traditionally a strong Republican district, the Conservatives would have seen that as a mandate. And, in 2010, thown a bunch of seats to the Democrats in districts with a much less strong Republican background.
For someone who entered the race less than a month ago, a virtual un-know with no money, still quite a showing. Did you happen to see what happened to Corzine in New Jersey, after Obama spent all weekend campaigning for him. Did you also see McDonald win by a landslide in Virginia. Oh no you would not want to talk about that now would you. Many republican wins all over the place, bad night for dems, good one for repubs. Guess what's coming your way in 2010. Major loses for your party.
Fox News Projects Owens to win, Republicans lose Seat for First Time in Century. Sarah Palin failed CF and Sinatra.
YouTube - Fleetwood Mac - Don't Stop
Where are we getting the 100 year thing?
New York's 23rd congressional district - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This district has been redistricted so much I can't decipher its history.
I see lots of Dems on that chart in the 20th Century. I see a Dem winning it in 1923 before any redistricting. Looks like he was re-elected in '27 and '31.Where are we getting the 100 year thing?
New York's 23rd congressional district - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This district has been redistricted so much I can't decipher its history.
The Democrats haven't won that specific district area since 1890 or something along the lines of that.
Notice after 1980 it was redistricted.
That's simply wrong according to the chart at the link.Where are we getting the 100 year thing?
New York's 23rd congressional district - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This district has been redistricted so much I can't decipher its history.
The Democrats haven't won that specific district area since 1890 or something along the lines of that.
I see lots of Dems on that chart in the 20th Century. I see a Dem winning it in 1923 before any redistricting. Looks like he was re-elected in '27 and '31.
(RTTNews) - Democrat Bill Owens outlasted Conservative candidate Doug Hoffman on Tuesday to claim the vacant seat for New York State's 23rd Congressional District - becoming the first Democrat to win the seat in more than 100 years.
It's simply not accurate, as I have shown you.I see lots of Dems on that chart in the 20th Century. I see a Dem winning it in 1923 before any redistricting. Looks like he was re-elected in '27 and '31.
Owens Edges Hoffman For NY-23 Seat
You'd have to look it up as to why, I'm not sure.(RTTNews) - Democrat Bill Owens outlasted Conservative candidate Doug Hoffman on Tuesday to claim the vacant seat for New York State's 23rd Congressional District - becoming the first Democrat to win the seat in more than 100 years.
That's simply wrong according to the chart at the link.
I see a Democrat cat that assumed the office in 1923 and obviously got re-elected at least a couple of times, served eleven years before resigning the seat in 1934 to take a robe on the bench.
So would it be the 1934 election last won by a Dem there? That's not quite 100 years, but who's counting or looking for any kind of accuracy, when regurgitated hyperbole is so much more fun for partisans?
Look at the chart. There was NO redistricting, and the guy served eleven years.That's simply wrong according to the chart at the link.
I see a Democrat cat that assumed the office in 1923 and obviously got re-elected at least a couple of times, served eleven years before resigning the seat in 1934 to take a robe on the bench.
So would it be the 1934 election last won by a Dem there? That's not quite 100 years, but who's counting or looking for any kind of accuracy, when regurgitated hyperbole is so much more fun for partisans?
Look at my link above. I'm pretty sure it has to do something with land area or along the lines of that.
I called it....dems would win in VA, lose in NY and barely win in NJ....
Damn, I suck. We won in NY? What da..