Fort Carson brigade headed to Kuwait for possible showdown with ISIS

You partisan assholes ought to at least try to act like united Americans when it comes to fucking national security.
Which is precisely what you did all during the Bush years, correct?
Name something Bush asked for in regards to the military or national security that he did not get. There must be something major for you to make that claim.
We were discussing how dissent is suddenly unpatriotic.

 
Come home safe, you warriors.

We will keep the traitorous far right reactionary thugs here under observation and under control.

The Bushies and their slime will not do anything to you make you or yours afraid. We will make sure of that.

RW, Jake or whomever you are today, seek help with your habitual dishonesty, please.

To our Carson heroes and their families: have no worry. LEOs have the anti-American agenda of Freewill and ilk under observation and under control.
 
You partisan assholes ought to at least try to act like united Americans when it comes to fucking national security.


Fuggedaboudit. The moment that "uppity negro", as a number of sickos here describe our duly elected President, moved into the White House, their patriotism flew right out the window. Ain't gonna happen.

Why do you quote a democrat when you want to accuse people of racism? Interesting what you did there but I doubt you realize how Freudian.


I responded to him. You do understand the difference, right? It's called a CONVERSATION. Adults have these things now and then. The clue that was was talking about others and not LL is the word "their".

Hope that helps, li'l slugger.
 
You partisan assholes ought to at least try to act like united Americans when it comes to fucking national security.
Which is precisely what you did all during the Bush years, correct?
Name something Bush asked for in regards to the military or national security that he did not get. There must be something major for you to make that claim.
We were discussing how dissent is suddenly unpatriotic.
Dissent? For days we are hearing how Obama is fucking up because there are a few hundred Marines and Army advisers in harms way at a facility in Iraq and how he is risking the lives of troops. When he orders a response team to reinforce the team already in place at our facilities on the Iraq border that are in place and designed for that exact mission, he gets complaints for that. Why would people complain and show dissent about our military staffing a position and facility to insure a quick response to incidents that create unacceptable danger to our Embassy or troops involved in training Iraqi security forces?
 
You partisan assholes ought to at least try to act like united Americans when it comes to fucking national security.

You mean like you did when you called W a liar for saying what everyone else did, including you, and Kerry called the troops terrorists?
 
Obama's failed foreign policy leads to yet another war.

How is ISIS a result of Obama's foreign policy? If anything, it's a result of Bush's foreign policy. We should have never gone into Iraq. Toppling Hussein created the vacuum by which ISIS has gained a place in the world.
 
Dissent? For days we are hearing how Obama is fucking up because there are a few hundred Marines and Army advisers in harms way at a facility in Iraq and how he is risking the lives of troops. When he orders a response team to reinforce the team already in place at our facilities on the Iraq border that are in place and designed for that exact mission, he gets complaints for that. Why would people complain and show dissent about our military staffing a position and facility to insure a quick response to incidents that create unacceptable danger to our Embassy or troops involved in training Iraqi security forces?
Because he likes to base military decisions on politics.
 
You partisan assholes ought to at least try to act like united Americans when it comes to fucking national security.
Which is precisely what you did all during the Bush years, correct?
Name something Bush asked for in regards to the military or national security that he did not get. There must be something major for you to make that claim.
We were discussing how dissent is suddenly unpatriotic.
Dissent? For days we are hearing how Obama is fucking up because there are a few hundred Marines and Army advisers in harms way at a facility in Iraq and how he is risking the lives of troops. When he orders a response team to reinforce the team already in place at our facilities on the Iraq border that are in place and designed for that exact mission, he gets complaints for that. Why would people complain and show dissent about our military staffing a position and facility to insure a quick response to incidents that create unacceptable danger to our Embassy or troops involved in training Iraqi security forces?

Remember when Obama won Iraq and spiked the football?

Obama busted a cap in bin Laden's ass

Game over!

Game over, man!

ISIS = JV
 
Dissent? For days we are hearing how Obama is fucking up because there are a few hundred Marines and Army advisers in harms way at a facility in Iraq and how he is risking the lives of troops. When he orders a response team to reinforce the team already in place at our facilities on the Iraq border that are in place and designed for that exact mission, he gets complaints for that. Why would people complain and show dissent about our military staffing a position and facility to insure a quick response to incidents that create unacceptable danger to our Embassy or troops involved in training Iraqi security forces?
Because he likes to base military decisions on politics.
His record indicates his decisions are based on choosing the path of the least amount of casualties, both US and collateral caused by US forces.
 
Remember when Obama won Iraq and spiked the football?

Afraid I don't remember that, because it didn't happen. Obama killed bin Laden and spiked the football. Iraq has never been a success story. Obama never declared success in Iraq, he declared "enough!" and cut our losses. The fact that he's taking us back into the frying pan is very problematic and disappointing.
 
His record indicates his decisions are based on choosing the path of the least amount of casualties, both US and collateral caused by US forces.

The least amount of casualties would be for the US to not be involved at all. So no, his record does not reflect that at all.
 
Dissent? For days we are hearing how Obama is fucking up because there are a few hundred Marines and Army advisers in harms way at a facility in Iraq and how he is risking the lives of troops. When he orders a response team to reinforce the team already in place at our facilities on the Iraq border that are in place and designed for that exact mission, he gets complaints for that. Why would people complain and show dissent about our military staffing a position and facility to insure a quick response to incidents that create unacceptable danger to our Embassy or troops involved in training Iraqi security forces?
Because he likes to base military decisions on politics.
His record indicates his decisions are based on choosing the path of the least amount of casualties, both US and collateral caused by US forces.
That's just buying time. These militant zealots aren't going away and are gaining in power. The generals aren't happy and know what's down the road.
 
Remember when Obama won Iraq and spiked the football?

Afraid I don't remember that, because it didn't happen. Obama killed bin Laden and spiked the football. Iraq has never been a success story. Obama never declared success in Iraq, he declared "enough!" and cut our losses. The fact that he's taking us back into the frying pan is very problematic and disappointing.

I will agree with you, Obama lost Iraq.
 
The least amount of casualties would be for the US to not be involved at all. So no, his record does not reflect that at all.
How did that work out on 9/11/01?
What does Iraq have to do with 9-11?
The cost of doing nothing may be more than doing something. The fear at the time was the nutsack was going for nukes. Lots of info on this, the Israelis took out his nuke plant back in the Reagan days so it wasn't out of the question.
 
Remember when Obama won Iraq and spiked the football?

Afraid I don't remember that, because it didn't happen. Obama killed bin Laden and spiked the football. Iraq has never been a success story. Obama never declared success in Iraq, he declared "enough!" and cut our losses. The fact that he's taking us back into the frying pan is very problematic and disappointing.

I will agree with you, Obama lost Iraq.

Iraq was lost from the beginning. It was always a hopeless endeavor.

When the United States government interferes with American affairs, it always goes badly. Why do we think our government can interfere in foreign problems half a world away that don't actually have anything to do with us, and it will go any better? We interfered in Iranian affairs, and created the Ayatollahs. We interfered in Iraq, and created Saddam Hussein. We interfered in Afghanistan, and created Osama bin Laden. We interfered in Iraq a second time, and created ISIS. So what, third time's a charm?
 
The cost of doing nothing may be more than doing something. The fear at the time was the nutsack was going for nukes. Lots of info on this, the Israelis took out his nuke plant back in the Reagan days so it wasn't out of the question.

If Israel was so worried about him, why didn't they go after him? Let the whole lot of them kill each other.
 
Asshole anti-American idiots. What Bush faced was known as LOYAL OPPOSITION and LOYAL DISSENT. What yiu fuckers do here is simply disloyal. YOU ROOT FOR THE OTHER TEAM SO LONG AS IT MAKES OBAMA APPEAR INEFFECTIVE.

We all know it. Admit it ya lying sacks of shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top