Forget the Russians: It’s the Federal Reserve Seeking to Meddle in Our Elections

[Toddsterpatriot]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

 

[TNHarley]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

 

[TNHarley]

The first Congress was not the founding fathers. Idk why you 2 keep implying that.
The "father" of the constitution was against it...

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

Nowhere in the enumerated powers does it give the fed gov to establish a central bank. That is a states job.
Skylar, it also wasnt the first session of the first congress. It was the third session.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And yet Madison signed into law the SECOND bank of the United States.

So much for 'being against it'. In point of fact, Madison signed a Central Bank into law.

The Founders disagreed. With Hamilton, Washington, and the 1st congress by a ratio of nearly 2 to 1 all eager for a Central Bank. And affirming its constitutionality.

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

 

[beautress]

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I like what the Founders favored.

Who'da thunk that when a woman took over the Congress at its speaker she would brag about how she's the most important person in the world and used every trick in the book to use her office as a political hack to annihilate other Americans who didn't see eye to eye with her? The Founders gave voting and office-holding to men. And they didn't have no Nancy Pelosi spewing vomitus at them 24-7-365, either. Not all of us women like what women in Congress do. Maxine Waters wants someone in her group to kill somebody in the Trump Administration while she works to assassinate his character. I think I'm gonna be sick just thinkin' about what these women have done to promote what the Founders thought as being pretty on the mark.

 

[TNHarley]

Madison signed it into law because of the war. He even backed out when peace negotiations started. But then the economy worsened and banks stopped redeeming notes.
It's not because he just changed his mind, as you so implied.
Still, that makes it no more constitutional. Again, implied powers was made up in thin air by one of the biggest statists in history

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still, that makes it no more constitutional.

Obviously, why expect the Founders would have a grasp on the Constitution?

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

I don't worship Congress.

 

[TNHarley]

Dude, our second president used Congress to suspend the first amendment.
Your arguments align to worshipping your superiors.
YES, statist, they can be wrong.

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

I don't worship Congress.

Evidently you do

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're more originalist than the Founders, good job!

God forbid people read, right?

Lots of people who read are ignorant of what the Founders favored.

I agree. Including your Congress you worship

I don't worship Congress.

Evidently you do

You're lying.