For the older ones like me. 45 and up.

Why?

Because the state is threatening teachers whether they are teaching CRT, Homosexuality or not

They are opening the gate to petty lawsuits that will force schools to prohibit all discussion
"Threatening them" with what? Progs are the ones who are bringing on the lawsuits, nimrod.
 
Why shouldn’t they be aware of other races and that some people are homosexual?
Not saying they shouldn’t. What does that have to do with math, english, etc? Why do you think it’s the schools job to teach kids about that and not the parents? Why do they get to decide when individual children are mature enough to discuss these subjects and not the parents? Why should a school board get to decide what is taught regarding these subjects and nit the parents?
 
Not saying they shouldn’t. What does that have to do with math, english, etc? Why do you think it’s the schools job to teach kids about that and not the parents? Why do they get to decide when individual children are mature enough to discuss these subjects and not the parents? Why should a school board get to decide what is taught regarding these subjects and nit the parents?
You are Regressing to the 1950s again
There is more to “Learn’n“ than Reading, Rit‘n and Rithmatec

I went to school in the 60s and 70’s and we learned more about society and the types of people that are in it
 
The Florida Law that has the liberoids and the progressives wetting themselves is the so-called “Don’t Say Gay” law.

“That bill, titled Parental Rights in Education, states that lessons about sexual orientation are banned outright in kindergarten through third grade. It also prohibits lessons in other grades unless they are ‘age-appropriate and developmentally appropriate.’” — Understanding Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' Bill - FindLaw

It doesn’t ban speech or anything like it. It gives parents a real say in how their kids are raised. What’s so wrong with limiting the age at which kids need to learn about any sexual activity? And after third grade, why not make sure it is age appropriate sex Ed?

Libs can’t distinguish this from the “banning of speech.” I mean, please.
 
You are Regressing to the 1950s again
There is more to “Learn’n“ than Reading, Rit‘n and Rithmatec

I went to school in the 60s and 70’s and we learned more about society and the types of people that are in it
Answer the question. Why does the state think its their responsibility to teach these things and not the parents? And also sexuality has little to nothing to do with 99% of classes a person takes in HS. Discuss that shit in health or have a fucking sex class that parents can opt their kids into. Then you can talk about whatever sex act you want. You still havent explained how sex has anything to do with math or history or english
 
Why shouldn’t they be aware of other races and that some people are homosexual?
Because such things can wait. What’s the rush? Kids have a right to be young and innocent for a short enough time as it is. Give it a rest. Let kids be kids and let parents have a fucking say in when they’re ready to learn about this stuff.
 
Because such things can wait. What’s the rush? Kids have a right to be young and innocent for a short enough time as it is. Give it a rest. Let kids be kids and let parents have a fucking say in when they’re ready to learn about this stuff.

Some kids may have two mommies, some kids may come from single parent households, some young children may be experiencing black, Hispanic or Asian people for the first time.

It is never too young to explain diversity to children
 
Some kids may have two mommies, some kids may come from single parent households, some young children may be experiencing black, Hispanic or Asian people for the first time.

It is never too young to explain diversity to children
This is a democracy. The voters have ruled.

Sucks, don't it?
 
Was there ever a time in history when we went to school where the ones throughout history that were fighting to censor speech or burn books were the good ones?



1625692886227.png
1633570950292.jpeg
 
Some kids may have two mommies, some kids may come from single parent households, some young children may be experiencing black, Hispanic or Asian people for the first time.

It is never too young to explain diversity to children
Two mommies can explain their deal to their kids. Two daddies can explain it to their kids. Other kids might want to discuss it with their own parents. But why should the schools get to supersede the rights of parents to decide when their own kids are ready? You seem to constantly dodge that point. Seriously, explain why non parents should override the parents’ determination of whether their kids are sufficiently matured to learn such things?

Kids and the minds of kids are not the property of the state.
 
Because such things can wait. What’s the rush? Kids have a right to be young and innocent for a short enough time as it is. Give it a rest. Let kids be kids and let parents have a fucking say in when they’re ready to learn about this stuff.
Here is why the women's lib movement was started and funded by people like the Rockefellers.

 
I remember Tipper Gore and liberal elites of the PMRC trying to demonize rock musicians and are responsible for Explicit Lyrics warnings we see on albums to this very day.
 

Forum List

Back
Top