FLCCC Alliance sues the FDA.

[eagle1462010]

The FLCCC Doctors are currently suing the FDA for their attacks against off label drugs for treatment of Covid.

Here is the lawsuit.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Complaint_Apter-v.-HHS-with-exhibits.pdf

2. The FDA breached this critical boundary between federal and state authority by directing the public, including health professionals and patients, not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19, even though the drug remains fully approved for human use.

3. This case is not about whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19. It’s about who determines the appropriate treatment for each unique patient and whether the FDA can interfere with that process.

4. The FDA has unlawfully taken formal, unequivocal, and conclusory actions to prohibit or otherwise interfere with the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19, including:

a. A publication entitled, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” Ex. 1, Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19, FDA (Dec. 10, 2021), https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19.

b. A “Frequently Asked Questions” that begins, “Q: Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? A: No. . . .” Ex. 2, FAQ: COVID-19 and Ivermectin Intended for Animals, FDA (Apr. 26, 2021), https://www.fda.gov/animalveterinar...n/faq-covid-19-and-ivermectin-intendedanimals (“Ivermectin FAQ”).

c. An August 21, 2021 tweet that reads, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” Ex. 3. The tweet displays the title of “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and includes a link to that publication. Id

d. An April 26, 2022 tweet that reads: “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.” Ex. 4. The tweet again displays the title of “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and includes a link to that publication. Id

 

[eagle1462010]

Home

FLCCC is The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance: Dedicated to COVID prevention & treatment, empowering individuals for better health.

covid19criticalcare.com

This is their vaccine injury treatment protocols. Watch the video.

 

[eagle1462010]

I hope they rip the FDA a new Asshole.

They deserve it.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Anybody else notice the vaxxed went from saying it was safe, effective & the very idea it was killing people was insane to now saying at least it's not as deadly as the ronaflu? Or that it may not protect perfectly but they are better off than those of us refusing the clot shots? These are all lies & time will tell the truth no matter how much they suppress it.

Ivermectin is both safe & seems to work just fine on ranchers who use it on cattle & horses along with themselves as needed. It's not only a paste form for animals, it's also an injectable or edible liquid. Tiny amounts are all that is needed even for large grazing animals.
I know this for a fact because I have cattle, horses & ivermectin

 

[eagle1462010]

ANybody else notice the vaxxed went from saying it was safe, effective & wasn't killing people to now saying at least it's not as deadly as the ronaflu?
That may be a lie as well &

Owned by Pharma. Fauchi and Paul going at it.

 

[eagle1462010]

NIH scientists received estimated $350 million in royalties since 2009: Report

The National Institutes of Health received verified royalties amounting to $134 million from 2009-2014, with more yet to be revealed.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Here is the actual lawsuit that forced them to disclose the Royalties.

PERIOD. Hands in the COOKIE JAR.

 

[eagle1462010]

Substack Investigation: Faucis Royalties And The $350 Million Royalty Payment Stream HIDDEN By NIH

Its the first time since 2005 that the NIH royalty payments receive oversight.

www.openthebooks.com

We found agency leadership and top scientists at NIH receiving royalty payments. Well-known scientists receiving payments during the period included:

• Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the highest-paid federal bureaucrat, received 23 royalty payments. (Fauci’s 2021 taxpayer-funded salary: $456,028).
• Francis Collins, NIH director from 2009-2021, received 14 payments. (Collins’ 2021 taxpayer-funded salary: $203,500)
• Clifford Lane, Fauci’s deputy at NIAID, received 8 payments. (Lane’s 2021 taxpayer-funded salary: $325,287)

In the above examples, although we know the number of payments to each scientist, we still don’t know how much money was paid – because the dollar figure was deleted (redacted) from the disclosures.

It’s been a struggle to get any useful information out of the agency on its royalty payments. NIH is acting like royalty payments are a state secret. (They’re not, or shouldn’t be!)

Consider how NIH is using taxpayer money to try and keep taxpayers ignorant and in the dark:

1. NIH defied the federal Freedom of Information Act law and refused to even acknowledge our open records request for the royalty payments. We filed our FOIA last September.

2. NIH used expensive taxpayer-funded litigation to slow-walk royalty disclosures (releasing the oldest royalties first). Although the agency admits to holding 3,000 pages, it will take ten months to produce them (300 pages per month). With Judicial Watch as our lawyers, we sued NIH in federal court last October.

3. NIH is heavily redacting key information on the royalty payments. For example, the agency erased 1. the payment amount, and, 2. who paid it! This makes the court-mandated production virtually worthless, despite our use of the latest forensic auditing tools

NIH is essentially telling you, the taxpayer, to pay up and shut up. They'll run things. They have forgotten that they work on behalf of the American people.

 

[sparky]

Owned by Pharma. Fauchi and Paul going at it.

around 5:30 and on...... ~S~

 

[eagle1462010]

around 5:30 and on...... ~S~

Exactly. We all know the real deal. Fauchi should be drawn and quartered.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The FLCCC Doctors are currently suing the FDA for their attacks against off label drugs for treatment of Covid.

Here is the lawsuit.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Complaint_Apter-v.-HHS-with-exhibits.pdf

2. The FDA breached this critical boundary between federal and state authority by directing the public, including health professionals and patients, not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19, even though the drug remains fully approved for human use.

3. This case is not about whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19. It’s about who determines the appropriate treatment for each unique patient and whether the FDA can interfere with that process.

4. The FDA has unlawfully taken formal, unequivocal, and conclusory actions to prohibit or otherwise interfere with the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19, including:

a. A publication entitled, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” Ex. 1, Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19, FDA (Dec. 10, 2021), https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19.

b. A “Frequently Asked Questions” that begins, “Q: Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? A: No. . . .” Ex. 2, FAQ: COVID-19 and Ivermectin Intended for Animals, FDA (Apr. 26, 2021), https://www.fda.gov/animalveterinar...n/faq-covid-19-and-ivermectin-intendedanimals (“Ivermectin FAQ”).

c. An August 21, 2021 tweet that reads, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” Ex. 3. The tweet displays the title of “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and includes a link to that publication. Id

d. An April 26, 2022 tweet that reads: “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.” Ex. 4. The tweet again displays the title of “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and includes a link to that publication. Id

The only thing thst keeps me from being super excited as I would like to be is we got the most corrupt court system in the world and the cabal makes sure they got judges who work firnthe globalists.