Five Founding Fathers Who Would Be Rejected by the Religious Right Today

Right. It's been happening ever since I can remember, religious fanatics trying to impose their perverse view of the world on society. You would have to be either blind or a liar to deny this.

Oh, you mean Christians are allowed to speak? I know how you Christophobic bigots hate that.

BUT your bigoted lie was "criminalizing protected liberty, legislating morality, and favoring believers above everyone else who does not buy into their irrational bullshit."
Even that insane Palin baptist church has been openly stating this. Seeking places of power in governments worldwide to change laws and customs to get the world ready for Jesus. Damn.

If you don't believe me you can look it up.

Wow, I guess you democrats better get cracking to end the first Amendment so you can throw those who have different religious views into prison.
 
America was founded as a haven for all religions.

That said, "...all men are created...endowed by their Creator..." (Declaration of Independence)

No other people in all of history have ever made this principle the basis of their governmental philosophy.

To steal a few lines from a great book on the topic, the spiritual brotherhood of men under the common fatherhood of God is a concept which is basic to this American philosophy. It expresses the spiritual relationship of God to Man and, in the light thereof, of Man to Man.

To forget these truths is a most heinous offense against the spirit of traditional America because the greatest sin is the lost consciousness of sin.

Bingo.
 
Isn't it funny that the South became predominantly Republican AFTER segregation ended and the Klan was defeated by Hoover.

The whole period of Slavery and Segregation - the South was staunchly democrat.

Republicans ended segregation - becoming Republican changed the south from the racist scumbags into decent folk - the south changed from pile of shit democrats, into decent American Republicans.

Thanks for the reminder.

No worries though - the democrats have their Klan back - they call it BLM now.

what do you not understand ...

1665694200000.png


the clan foremost was a christian organization, their requirement - those people wouldn't know what party affiliation would even mean ...

that's just you talking out the side of your mouth ... dribbling as usual and sucking slim.
 
what do you not understand ...

View attachment 709571

the clan foremost was a christian organization, their requirement - those people wouldn't know what party affiliation would even mean ...

that's just you talking out the side of your mouth ... dribbling as usual and sucking slim.

I understand perfectly.

When the south was democrat, it was slavery, segregation, and the Klan.

When the south turned Republican, segregation ended, and the Klan was destroyed.

Now that democrats are rising, they demand segregation and forcing of whites into ghettos AND the Klan is back - called BLM now.


democrats, democrats never change.
 
I understand perfectly.

When the south was democrat, it was slavery, segregation, and the Klan.

When the south turned Republican, segregation ended, and the Klan was destroyed.

Now that democrats are rising, they demand segregation and forcing of whites into ghettos AND the Klan is back - called BLM now.


democrats, democrats never change.
that's just you talking out the side of your mouth ... dribbling as usual and sucking slim.

you're obsession with political parties -

1665706458158.png


does not negate the fact the clans required enrollment was white christians only ... they rule whichever party they belong to and are the same as those claiming america is a christian nation.

1665706828138.png


maga is hardly democrats.
 
you're obsession with political parties -

View attachment 709651

does not negate the fact the clans required enrollment was white christians only ... they rule whichever party they belong to and are the same as those claiming america is a christian nation.

View attachment 709657

maga is hardly democrats.
True, democrats hate America - hate human life, actually.
 
BUT your bigoted lie was "criminalizing protected liberty, legislating morality, and favoring believers above everyone else who does not buy into their irrational bullshit."


Nonsense. Do you think that you are invisible, your intentions not revealed by your actions? Damn.

You believers have absolutely no shade on your shit. Calling the religiously addled out on this anti constitutional madness is not bigotry. Its patriotism and fidelity to the founding principles of this country established to insure that what you hope to achieve, a tyrannical theocracy based on the most superstitious, ignorant, and perverse interpretation of scripture possible, will never be.Never.
 
Last edited:
Jesus had very little to say about how a country was supposed to tax its citizens. If you think otherwise, post some quotes

When Jesus was asked about taxation by rome he asked the crowd whose image was on a coin and said, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's."

It was the roman assertion that caesar was a god.

That being said Jesus was telling his own people to render unto caesar nothing because nothing belonged to caesar especially in Judea because he was not God. To the average roman it sounded like he was advocating taxation even though he was openly saying the exact opposite. Brilliant.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top