First the GOP said there was no quid pro quo. Now they are saying there is but “so what?”

[Billy000]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-impeachment-quid-pro-quo-republicans-191813907.html
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

 

[Oddball]

Why can't both be true?

 

[miketx]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

 

[konradv]

Why can't both be true?

Of course they can be. OP is just pointing out the hypocrisy.

 

[Oddball]

Why can't both be true?

Of course they can be. OP is just pointing out the hypocrisy.

Charges of hypocrisy coming from you double-dealing liberoidal dweebs?!?

Oh fuck my life!

 

[BrokeLoser]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

First the GOP said there was no quid pro quo. Now they are saying there is but “so what?”
First the Mexicrats said he was guilty of banging liberal porn whores, then they said he colluded with Russia...then they said no, it was obstruction...then they said his SCOTUS nomination raped liberal whores...then they got pissed because he asked Ukraine to expose Mexicrat corruption....hahaha
Please stop making a fool of yourself...it's time for you disgusting shameless fucks to tuck your tail and hide...you've been owned.

 

[Billy000]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

View attachment 303261

Why do you even bother posting on here?

 

[jwoodie]

First the Democrats said there was Russian collusion. Now they are saying there is none but “so what?”

 

[bendog]

well, imo, that's it. Essentially he attempted to use his power to hurt a political rival. And it was pretty stupid because even if, like me, you think Trump and his daughter and three boy kings are crooks ….. Hunter's not much different, and neither is Joe's brother. He didn't need his Ukraine adventure with Ghouliani to bring that up.

The dems don't really have anyone better. Bloomberg's much better with the Democrat centrists, but he's not much good with blacks.. Rough road in Mich and Pa and even Wisc without a high vote from blacks (pun).

Gonna kick him out of office for basically being a stupid venal man? Nah

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.

Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

YAWN...hey what's the latest on mueller?

 

[evenflow1969]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

First the GOP said there was no quid pro quo. Now they are saying there is but “so what?”
First the Mexicrats said he was guilty of banging liberal porn whores, then they said he colluded with Russia...then they said no, it was obstruction...then they said his SCOTUS nomination raped liberal whores...then they got pissed because he asked Ukraine to expose Mexicrat corruption....hahaha
Please stop making a fool of yourself...it's time for you disgusting shameless fucks to tuck your tail and hide...you've been owned.

The lying peice of shit repugs are the ones making fools of them selves. Of course none of you seem to have problem with being a fucking lyar.

 

[konradv]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

YAWN...hey what's the latest on mueller?

Whatever happened with Whitewater? Ken Starr's back, so maybe we'll finally find out what he spent those millions on, besides embarrassing Clinton over a blow job.

 

[bendog]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.

Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

YAWN...hey what's the latest on mueller?

still a republican. LOL

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The lying peice of shit repugs are the ones making fools of them selves. Of course none of you seem to have problem with being a fucking lyar.

Liberals want to pass legislation introducing ^that^ as the new Preamble to the constitution...cuz ya know, trump isn't putting a whupping on them or anything.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

First the GOP said there was no quid pro quo. Now they are saying there is but “so what?”
First the Mexicrats said he was guilty of banging liberal porn whores, then they said he colluded with Russia...then they said no, it was obstruction...then they said his SCOTUS nomination raped liberal whores...then they got pissed because he asked Ukraine to expose Mexicrat corruption....hahaha
Please stop making a fool of yourself...it's time for you disgusting shameless fucks to tuck your tail and hide...you've been owned.

The lying peice of shit repugs are the ones making fools of them selves. Of course none of you seem to have problem with being a fucking lyar.

haha...you clowns will go down in history as the most fucked in the head bunch ever known...CONGRATS!

Trump can lie all he wants so long as he continues bitch-slapping the living fuck out of you disgusting bastards daily.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Whatever happened with Whitewater? Ken Starr's back, so maybe we'll finally find out what he spent those millions on, besides embarrassing Clinton over a blow job.

this is what mueller found out?

 

[evenflow1969]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

First the GOP said there was no quid pro quo. Now they are saying there is but “so what?”
First the Mexicrats said he was guilty of banging liberal porn whores, then they said he colluded with Russia...then they said no, it was obstruction...then they said his SCOTUS nomination raped liberal whores...then they got pissed because he asked Ukraine to expose Mexicrat corruption....hahaha
Please stop making a fool of yourself...it's time for you disgusting shameless fucks to tuck your tail and hide...you've been owned.

The lying peice of shit repugs are the ones making fools of them selves. Of course none of you seem to have problem with being a fucking lyar.

haha...you clowns will go down in history as the most fucked in the head bunch ever known...CONGRATS!

Trump can lie all he wants so long as he continues bitch-slapping the living fuck out of you disgusting bastards daily.

You will go down in history as loving lyars and will end up in the pit for it as well. Go fuck your self!

 

[Astrostar]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

View attachment 303261

Why do you even bother posting on here?

 

[Billy000]

Why can't both be true?

Because obviously they can’t be.

 

[Astrostar]

Lol the GOP is so pathetic. They should have just said “so what?” from the beginning. It was inevitable they would say “so what?” What a bunch of fucking cowards.
Republicans Now Say It Doesn't Matter If There Was A Quid Pro Quo With Ukraine

But Republicans changed their story on the matter this week after The New York Times revealed the existence of a book manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton. The book, which is due to be released later this year, alleges that Trump told Bolton directly that the aid to Ukraine was tied to the Ukrainian government opening investigations into Biden and his son.

The revelation from a first-hand witness threatened to derail Republican desires for a quick acquittal of Trump in the Senate impeachment trial this week and upped the pressure on them to allow witnesses such as Bolton to testify and new documents to be presented during the proceedings.

During their opening arguments in the Senate, Trump’s defense team contended that even if Bolton’s account were true, it would not merit the removal of a president during an election year. Their argument opened the door for some Republican senators to acknowledge that Trump did, in fact, withhold Ukraine aid, but that it didn’t merit his removal from office because he was morally justified in seeking investigations into the Bidens.

View attachment 303261

Why do you even bother posting on here?

The sad thing ab out this Trump fiasco is that Democrats have to spend all their tine cleaning up messes created by Republican Presidents. Clinton had to sweep up after Bush. Obama had to clean up Dubya's Iraq mess and the worst economy since the great depression. And now Biden will have to clean up after the Trump/Moscow Mitch disaster.

No wonder we need the Democrats so much.