FIRST READING: How Canada ignored warnings that euthanasia would immediately go too far

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Aug 6, 2012
27,495
24,240
2,405
Police states always lead to the collapse of the economy and other government resources. In Canadas case, it's clearly healthcare, which has now really become deathcare.

Mismanagement of funds in Canada and allocation of taxes to the Security Industrial Complex means the state wants people gone earlier than their natural expiration date.

Is this what America wants for it's citizens? Do not follow us. Heed our warnings...


Barely a week now goes by without some new case emerging of a sick Canadian being offered assisted death in lieu of treatment. Most recently, it was a Canadian combat veteran who was casually offered the option of dying after he approached Veteran Affairs Canada for help with his PTSD.



It’s a nightmare scenario that was envisioned by no shortage of ethicists and health figures when assisted death was first written into Canadian law. But with few exceptions, these warnings were ignored by the various court rulings that ultimately forced Canada into adopting the world’s most permissive regime of legal euthanasia.



It was the 2015 Supreme Court decision Carter v. Canada that first struck down Criminal Code bans on doctor-assisted suicide and compelled the House of Commons to encode legal euthanasia into law.


Notably, Carter v. Canada directly contradicted another Supreme Court decision from just 22 years before — that was even written by some of the same justices. In 1993’s Rodriguez v. British Columbia, the Supreme Court had dismissed a Charter appeal against the assisted suicide ban, arguing that such a measure would violate the Charter’s “underlying hypothesis” of the sanctity of human life. “Given the concerns about abuse and the great difficulty in creating appropriate safeguards, the blanket prohibition on assisted suicide is not arbitrary or unfair,” read the 1993 ruling.
 
Since resources are always limited, socialized medicine always comes down to death panels & judgments on a patients usefulness to a society.
When everything is calculated for the greater good, the oldest & sickest are liabilities.
Look what the blue states did to the seniors during the plandemic, sending the sick ones to nursing homes.
England was giving seniors overdoses of a drug that is used in a lethal injection cocktails.

This is what the lefties do. They did it in Nazi Germany & the Soviet Union.
 
Police states always lead to the collapse of the economy and other government resources. In Canadas case, it's clearly healthcare, which has now really become deathcare.

Mismanagement of funds in Canada and allocation of taxes to the Security Industrial Complex means the state wants people gone earlier than their natural expiration date.

Is this what America wants for it's citizens? Do not follow us. Heed our warnings...


Barely a week now goes by without some new case emerging of a sick Canadian being offered assisted death in lieu of treatment. Most recently, it was a Canadian combat veteran who was casually offered the option of dying after he approached Veteran Affairs Canada for help with his PTSD.



It’s a nightmare scenario that was envisioned by no shortage of ethicists and health figures when assisted death was first written into Canadian law. But with few exceptions, these warnings were ignored by the various court rulings that ultimately forced Canada into adopting the world’s most permissive regime of legal euthanasia.



It was the 2015 Supreme Court decision Carter v. Canada that first struck down Criminal Code bans on doctor-assisted suicide and compelled the House of Commons to encode legal euthanasia into law.


Notably, Carter v. Canada directly contradicted another Supreme Court decision from just 22 years before — that was even written by some of the same justices. In 1993’s Rodriguez v. British Columbia, the Supreme Court had dismissed a Charter appeal against the assisted suicide ban, arguing that such a measure would violate the Charter’s “underlying hypothesis” of the sanctity of human life. “Given the concerns about abuse and the great difficulty in creating appropriate safeguards, the blanket prohibition on assisted suicide is not arbitrary or unfair,” read the 1993 ruling.
Governments all around the world will go down this road as they will be focused on limiting population levels.

Maybe some day they will over a weekend in Hawaii before dying if they agree to it.
 
Governments all around the world will go down this road as they will be focused on limiting population levels.

Maybe some day they will over a weekend in Hawaii before dying if they agree to it.

it's Canadas police state, and some of us are making citizens, foreign governments and politicians aware.

They destroyed Canada, and this must be known.
 
This is just state sanctioned murder and it is indicative of a barbaric and failed nation.

Canada is a vile, frozen hellhole. Maybe it wasn’t always maybe it won’t remain this way but as it stands, it is not a place worthy of any respect whatsoever.
 
it's Canadas police state, and some of us are making citizens, foreign governments and politicians aware.

They destroyed Canada, and this must be known.
I think the government is aware of the governments goals of what the government is doing.

Just say'in.

And the state run media?

LOL. Yea, they care too. :auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top