- Dec 18, 2012
- 4,525
- 7,464
- 1,930
This is not some punt down the road, this is an MMA smackdown that leaves your ears ringing. I urge everyone to sit back and pour a glass of whatever, and read the whole 22 pages! This judge rocks!
coronanews123.wordpress.com
Federal Judge Slaps Down Biden Vax Mandate, Taiwan Stops Child Pfizer Injections Over Heart Inflammation
Ticker November 2021: CDC Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, COVID “vaccine” possibly linked deaths: 18,000+. Hospitalizations: 88,000+. Permanent disabilities: 28,000+.
Unleashing one rhetorical salvo after another, a federal judge has ruled in a lawsuit joined by five states that the Biden injection mandate constitutes a clear overreach of Executive Branch power. In the same week, the government of Taiwan has put a halt to experimental COVID vaccine injections for children due to concerns over heart inflammation.
The judge wrote for a three-judge panel which ruled unanimously.
The attempted Biden mandate, promulgated through OSHA, ordered all US companies employing over 100 people to require the COVID “vaccination” of all employees, or submit to weekly testing. Non-complaint companies were to be fined $5,000 per non-compliant employee.
Judge Kurt D. Englehardt of the federal Fifth Circuit Court wrote in no uncertain terms. He ordered that:
“OSHA take no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate…”
The judge wrote that the mandate:
“grossly exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority.”
The judge said the mandate was “staggeringly overbroad.”
[FULL TEXT OF DECISION]
In introductory remarks, Judge Englehardt wrote:
“After the President voiced his displeasure with the country’s
vaccination rate in September,12 the Administration pored over the U.S. Code in search of authority, or a “work-around,” for imposing a national vaccine mandate. The vehicle it landed on was an OSHA [Emergency Temporary Standard.]”
The crisply written 22-page decision said that the OSHA mandate:
“was not—and likely could not be, under the Commerce Clause and nondelegation doctrine—intended to authorize a workplace safety administration in the deep recesses of the federal bureaucracy to make sweeping pronouncements on matters of public health affecting every member of society in the profoundest of ways.”
Taking a veiled swipe at Biden’s prior remark that he was “losing patience” with Americans who decline to submit to the drugs, which are still early in Phase III clinical trials, which do not end until late in 2022 at the earliest — and thus are still experimental — the judge wrote that:
“the Article II executive [cannot] breathe new power into OSHA’s authority—no matter how thin patience wears.”
The executive branch of the US government was created in 1787 by Article II of the US Constitution.
In a scathing rebuke the judge wrote:
“the Mandate makes no serious attempt to explain why OSHA and the President himself were against vaccine mandates before they were for one here.”
The decision concludes:
“It is clear that a denial of the petitioners’ proposed stay would do them irreparable harm. For one, the Mandate threatens to substantially burden the liberty interests of reluctant individual recipients put to a choice between their jobs and their jabs.”
“…a stay is firmly in the public interest. From economic uncertainty to workplace strife, the mere specter of the Mandate has contributed to untold economic upheaval in recent months. Of course, the principles at stake when it comes to the Mandate are not reducible to dollars and cents. The public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions—even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials.’
The federal judge opined that the challenge to the mandate showed “great likelihood of success on the merits.”
Federal Judge Slaps Down Biden Vax Mandate, Taiwan Stops Child Pfizer Injections Over Heart Inflammation
Above: Judge Kurt D. Englehardt Ticker November 2021: CDC Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, COVID “vaccine” possibly linked deaths: 18,000+. Hospitalizations: 88,000+. Permanent di…
coronanews123.wordpress.com
Federal Judge Slaps Down Biden Vax Mandate, Taiwan Stops Child Pfizer Injections Over Heart Inflammation
Ticker November 2021: CDC Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, COVID “vaccine” possibly linked deaths: 18,000+. Hospitalizations: 88,000+. Permanent disabilities: 28,000+.
Unleashing one rhetorical salvo after another, a federal judge has ruled in a lawsuit joined by five states that the Biden injection mandate constitutes a clear overreach of Executive Branch power. In the same week, the government of Taiwan has put a halt to experimental COVID vaccine injections for children due to concerns over heart inflammation.
The judge wrote for a three-judge panel which ruled unanimously.
The attempted Biden mandate, promulgated through OSHA, ordered all US companies employing over 100 people to require the COVID “vaccination” of all employees, or submit to weekly testing. Non-complaint companies were to be fined $5,000 per non-compliant employee.
Judge Kurt D. Englehardt of the federal Fifth Circuit Court wrote in no uncertain terms. He ordered that:
“OSHA take no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate…”
The judge wrote that the mandate:
“grossly exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority.”
The judge said the mandate was “staggeringly overbroad.”
[FULL TEXT OF DECISION]
In introductory remarks, Judge Englehardt wrote:
“After the President voiced his displeasure with the country’s
vaccination rate in September,12 the Administration pored over the U.S. Code in search of authority, or a “work-around,” for imposing a national vaccine mandate. The vehicle it landed on was an OSHA [Emergency Temporary Standard.]”
The crisply written 22-page decision said that the OSHA mandate:
“was not—and likely could not be, under the Commerce Clause and nondelegation doctrine—intended to authorize a workplace safety administration in the deep recesses of the federal bureaucracy to make sweeping pronouncements on matters of public health affecting every member of society in the profoundest of ways.”
Taking a veiled swipe at Biden’s prior remark that he was “losing patience” with Americans who decline to submit to the drugs, which are still early in Phase III clinical trials, which do not end until late in 2022 at the earliest — and thus are still experimental — the judge wrote that:
“the Article II executive [cannot] breathe new power into OSHA’s authority—no matter how thin patience wears.”
The executive branch of the US government was created in 1787 by Article II of the US Constitution.
In a scathing rebuke the judge wrote:
“the Mandate makes no serious attempt to explain why OSHA and the President himself were against vaccine mandates before they were for one here.”
The decision concludes:
“It is clear that a denial of the petitioners’ proposed stay would do them irreparable harm. For one, the Mandate threatens to substantially burden the liberty interests of reluctant individual recipients put to a choice between their jobs and their jabs.”
“…a stay is firmly in the public interest. From economic uncertainty to workplace strife, the mere specter of the Mandate has contributed to untold economic upheaval in recent months. Of course, the principles at stake when it comes to the Mandate are not reducible to dollars and cents. The public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions—even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials.’
The federal judge opined that the challenge to the mandate showed “great likelihood of success on the merits.”
