- Dec 18, 2012
- 4,529
- 7,466
- 1,930
LOL I wonder if the FDA reads it own studies that it links! 
coronanews123.wordpress.com
FDA Inadvertently Cites Studies Showing Ivermectin Works, Pandemic Was Created
In an indication that the FDA has perpetrated fraud upon the American public, the FDA’s own website which says that Ivermectin is not “effective against COVID” links to science studies which say exactly the opposite. The evidence is sufficient for a strong criminal prosecution against, at a minimum, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the FDA.
Although the links for the individual studies go only to the study protocols, the studies may be researched by title and the full studies found.
FDA November 2021 Ivermectin page. (Web archive of FDA Ivermectin page as it appeared on Nov. 11, 2021)
“Clinical Trials” page link on FDA Ivermectin page (PDF archive of “Clinical Trials” page as it appeared on Nov. 11, 2021)
Below:From FDA Ivermectin page, Nov. 11, 2021
Below: Image of page which comes up when “Clinical Trials” is clicked on FDA Ivermectin page
c
The studies range in date from mid-2020 into mid-2021, as the FDA and Dr. Fauci maintain their hard positions against using Ivermectin in any way for COVID. Meanwhile, thousands of mostly elderly have died for lack of treatment.
Although overwhelming science has been cataloged which shows Ivermectin reduces COVID mortality by as much as 80% and more, no US or any other media outlet has bothered to mention that many of the studies are pinned to the FDA’s own webpage. Instead, the media picks up on the false implication, made recently that Ivermectin is only for livestock.
Below: FDA tweet on Ivermectin
Ivermectin is a Nobel Prize-winning drug which has been in use for humans for various ailments, for decades, and has a sterling safety record. Declines in COVID mortality on the order of 80% would have meant no pandemic.
Following are the conclusions of the studies listed in the FDA list of sources for its own position. However the linked studies do not support that position, that “available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.” The linked studies support the opposite. Presently there are 81 studies listed, but only a handful have “results available.” The ones that do all show that Ivermectin works, a sampling below.
Conclusion: “According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.”
2. “The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with non-severe COVID-19: A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial”
Conclusion: “The positive signal found in this pilot warrants the conduction oflarger trials using ivermectin for the early treatment of COVID-19.Such trials should include patients with risk factors for severe diseaseas well as patients with pneumonia. The potential for a mechanism of action different to direct antiviral effect also opens the door for preexposure prophylaxis in high-risk groups.”
3. “Safety and Efficacy of the combined use of ivermectin, dexamethasone, enoxaparin and aspirin against COVID 19”
Conclusion: “we consider IDEA protocol to be a scientifically based, low-cost treatment and sustainable healthcare strategy with a favorable benefit-risk ratio, based on the results reported in this article: reduction in overall mortality to one fourth, reduction in mortality of hospitalized patients to one eighth and no progression of mild cases to moderate or severe cases.”
4. “Use of Ivermectin as a Potential Chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19 in Egypt: A Randomized Clinical Trial”
Conclusion: “Ivermectin is suggested to be a promising effective chemoprophylactic drug against COVID-19. Ivermectin is inexpensive, available and quite safe drug. As this is the first report regarding use of ivermectin in COVID-19 prophylaxis, it is very appropriate to promptly and rigorously study this drug further.”
5. “Effectiveness of Ivermectin as add-on Therapy in COVID-19 Management (Pilot Trial)”
Conclusion: “The mean time to stay in the hospital was significantly lower in IVM group compared with the controls…Add-on use of IVM to HCQ and AZT had better effectiveness, shorter hospital stay, and relatively safe compared with controls. however, a larger prospective study with longer follow up may be needed to validate these results.”
6. Use of Ivermectin as a Potential Chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19 in Egypt: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Conclusion: “Ivermectin is suggested to be a promising effective chemoprophylactic drug against COVID-19. Ivermectin is inexpensive, available and quite safe drug. As this is the first report regarding use of ivermectin in COVID-19 prophylaxis, it is very appropriate to promptly and rigorously study this drug further.”
Undisputed success stories continue to emanate from countries such as Mexico and India. In India, physicians and the Indian Bar Association have filed a lawsuit against WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin. The legal notice filed by the IBA states:
“It is amply clear that your criminal mind is working swiftly to…cause as much possible damage to people and to stop the use of ‘Ivermectin’…” (LEGAL NOTICE)
In a study published at the NIH repository, Ivermectin is possibly effective against COVID mutant strains as well. In “Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19,”the authors write:
“The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.”
However, currently, any suggestion that Ivermectin is effective, is bashed down by Facebook, Big Tech, and the media with charges of “misinformation.”
Rarely has information which upsets the narrative of government authorities come so conveniently from the government itself.
Thus the FDA’s blanket statement on its Ivermectin webpage, “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19,” is a polar, direct inversion of the truth.
This is the strongest evidence yet that fraud has been perpetrated on the American public, with the intention of framing the currently still-experimental COVID Pfizer and Moderna injections as salvation.
Below: Article by The American Association for the Advancement of Science on Navarro, Spain study, linked in FDA sources on Ivermectin
FDA’s Own Cited Studies Show Ivermectin Works, Pandemic Was Manufactured
In an indication that the FDA has perpetrated the greatest fraud upon the American public in history, the FDA’s own website which says that Ivermectin is not “effective against COVID…
coronanews123.wordpress.com
FDA Inadvertently Cites Studies Showing Ivermectin Works, Pandemic Was Created
In an indication that the FDA has perpetrated fraud upon the American public, the FDA’s own website which says that Ivermectin is not “effective against COVID” links to science studies which say exactly the opposite. The evidence is sufficient for a strong criminal prosecution against, at a minimum, Dr. Anthony Fauci and the FDA.
Although the links for the individual studies go only to the study protocols, the studies may be researched by title and the full studies found.
FDA November 2021 Ivermectin page. (Web archive of FDA Ivermectin page as it appeared on Nov. 11, 2021)
“Clinical Trials” page link on FDA Ivermectin page (PDF archive of “Clinical Trials” page as it appeared on Nov. 11, 2021)
Below:From FDA Ivermectin page, Nov. 11, 2021
Below: Image of page which comes up when “Clinical Trials” is clicked on FDA Ivermectin page
c
The studies range in date from mid-2020 into mid-2021, as the FDA and Dr. Fauci maintain their hard positions against using Ivermectin in any way for COVID. Meanwhile, thousands of mostly elderly have died for lack of treatment.
Although overwhelming science has been cataloged which shows Ivermectin reduces COVID mortality by as much as 80% and more, no US or any other media outlet has bothered to mention that many of the studies are pinned to the FDA’s own webpage. Instead, the media picks up on the false implication, made recently that Ivermectin is only for livestock.
Below: FDA tweet on Ivermectin
Ivermectin is a Nobel Prize-winning drug which has been in use for humans for various ailments, for decades, and has a sterling safety record. Declines in COVID mortality on the order of 80% would have meant no pandemic.
Following are the conclusions of the studies listed in the FDA list of sources for its own position. However the linked studies do not support that position, that “available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.” The linked studies support the opposite. Presently there are 81 studies listed, but only a handful have “results available.” The ones that do all show that Ivermectin works, a sampling below.
Conclusion: “According to the findings obtained, ivermectin can provide an increase in clinical recovery, improvement in prognostic laboratory parameters and a decrease in mortality rates even when used in patients with severe COVID-19. Consequently, ivermectin should be considered as an alternative drug that can be used in the treatment of COVID-19 disease or as an additional option to existing protocols.”
2. “The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with non-severe COVID-19: A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial”
Conclusion: “The positive signal found in this pilot warrants the conduction oflarger trials using ivermectin for the early treatment of COVID-19.Such trials should include patients with risk factors for severe diseaseas well as patients with pneumonia. The potential for a mechanism of action different to direct antiviral effect also opens the door for preexposure prophylaxis in high-risk groups.”
3. “Safety and Efficacy of the combined use of ivermectin, dexamethasone, enoxaparin and aspirin against COVID 19”
Conclusion: “we consider IDEA protocol to be a scientifically based, low-cost treatment and sustainable healthcare strategy with a favorable benefit-risk ratio, based on the results reported in this article: reduction in overall mortality to one fourth, reduction in mortality of hospitalized patients to one eighth and no progression of mild cases to moderate or severe cases.”
4. “Use of Ivermectin as a Potential Chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19 in Egypt: A Randomized Clinical Trial”
Conclusion: “Ivermectin is suggested to be a promising effective chemoprophylactic drug against COVID-19. Ivermectin is inexpensive, available and quite safe drug. As this is the first report regarding use of ivermectin in COVID-19 prophylaxis, it is very appropriate to promptly and rigorously study this drug further.”
5. “Effectiveness of Ivermectin as add-on Therapy in COVID-19 Management (Pilot Trial)”
Conclusion: “The mean time to stay in the hospital was significantly lower in IVM group compared with the controls…Add-on use of IVM to HCQ and AZT had better effectiveness, shorter hospital stay, and relatively safe compared with controls. however, a larger prospective study with longer follow up may be needed to validate these results.”
6. Use of Ivermectin as a Potential Chemoprophylaxis for COVID-19 in Egypt: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Conclusion: “Ivermectin is suggested to be a promising effective chemoprophylactic drug against COVID-19. Ivermectin is inexpensive, available and quite safe drug. As this is the first report regarding use of ivermectin in COVID-19 prophylaxis, it is very appropriate to promptly and rigorously study this drug further.”
Strongest Evidence Yet of Criminal Fraud
Since last year, legions of doctors and scientists have been pointing to the scientific evidence that Ivermectin works, such as that compiled at IVMMeta.comUndisputed success stories continue to emanate from countries such as Mexico and India. In India, physicians and the Indian Bar Association have filed a lawsuit against WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin. The legal notice filed by the IBA states:
“It is amply clear that your criminal mind is working swiftly to…cause as much possible damage to people and to stop the use of ‘Ivermectin’…” (LEGAL NOTICE)
In a study published at the NIH repository, Ivermectin is possibly effective against COVID mutant strains as well. In “Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19,”the authors write:
“The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.”
However, currently, any suggestion that Ivermectin is effective, is bashed down by Facebook, Big Tech, and the media with charges of “misinformation.”
Rarely has information which upsets the narrative of government authorities come so conveniently from the government itself.
Thus the FDA’s blanket statement on its Ivermectin webpage, “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19,” is a polar, direct inversion of the truth.
This is the strongest evidence yet that fraud has been perpetrated on the American public, with the intention of framing the currently still-experimental COVID Pfizer and Moderna injections as salvation.
Below: Article by The American Association for the Advancement of Science on Navarro, Spain study, linked in FDA sources on Ivermectin
