FBI Rot: Rogue Election Meddlers, White Guys Run Amok

Really? Multiple times? Why would you be so obsessed with that? Even if I was a paid-for-posting poster - I would donate it all to orphanages. So what's your problem, Gasbag?


This is a typical tactic, when they don't know what to say, they'll accuse you of being paid-LOL It's just another Reich wing very common comment used by below the bar morons.

I am often accused of being PAID--LOL I wish someone would pay me for this--LOL

Thank you. I can understand why Trump's "poorly educated" would think we are paid to post. All that subject/verb stuff must seem very confusing to them.
Aren't all you 47%'ers paid to post?

Only a select number, tbh. Paying an imbecile to post seems like it wouldn't come to fruition. I'm supposing therefore that francoHFW is not PPP. In those cases, they scare them to post. The big bad Republicans will be coming for their welfare.
A) Those paid are only on FB and Reddit.
B) The 47% don't exist, just BS propaganda. If you count all taxes and fees, we have almost a flat tax system, with the richest ending up with all the new wealth.

:lmao: Those are the ones have been prominently exposed. But the paid trolls are on all the sites, bro. That'd just be fucking stupid as you to not penetrate the other realms.
 
This is a typical tactic, when they don't know what to say, they'll accuse you of being paid-LOL It's just another Reich wing very common comment used by below the bar morons.

I am often accused of being PAID--LOL I wish someone would pay me for this--LOL

Thank you. I can understand why Trump's "poorly educated" would think we are paid to post. All that subject/verb stuff must seem very confusing to them.
Aren't all you 47%'ers paid to post?

Only a select number, tbh. Paying an imbecile to post seems like it wouldn't come to fruition. I'm supposing therefore that francoHFW is not PPP. In those cases, they scare them to post. The big bad Republicans will be coming for their welfare.
A) Those paid are only on FB and Reddit.
B) The 47% don't exist, just BS propaganda. If you count all taxes and fees, we have almost a flat tax system, with the richest ending up with all the new wealth.
:lmao: Those are the ones have been prominently exposed. But the paid trolls are on all the sites, bro. That'd just be fucking stupid as you to not penetrate the other realms.
They weren't exposed. The PAC announced it. The New BS GOP is the secret money etc outfit. duh.
 
Thank you. I can understand why Trump's "poorly educated" would think we are paid to post. All that subject/verb stuff must seem very confusing to them.
Aren't all you 47%'ers paid to post?

Only a select number, tbh. Paying an imbecile to post seems like it wouldn't come to fruition. I'm supposing therefore that francoHFW is not PPP. In those cases, they scare them to post. The big bad Republicans will be coming for their welfare.
A) Those paid are only on FB and Reddit.
B) The 47% don't exist, just BS propaganda. If you count all taxes and fees, we have almost a flat tax system, with the richest ending up with all the new wealth.
:lmao: Those are the ones have been prominently exposed. But the paid trolls are on all the sites, bro. That'd just be fucking stupid as you to not penetrate the other realms.
They weren't exposed. The PAC announced it. The New BS GOP is the secret money etc outfit. duh.

Exposed. DNC is corrupt as all hell.
 
I'd say the playing field became a lot more level this past week. As one that doesn't care for either, I'd like to see something put the fear of God into at least one of these candidates.
 
Well, the Russians succeeded....

in making our law enforcement agencies look like we live in a banana republic....

wonder if they have MOLES within the FBI?
 
Clinton isn't an insider....the elites within the govt are trying to keep her from becoming president. The Power to B's in the world don't want her there...TWICE NOW, whoever is really running the show, has manipulated the results to keep her out.

what are they afraid of...her exposing?? :eek:

;)
 
If Hillary loses it won't be because of her own criminal corrupt actions, it won't be because she sold government favors to enrich herself and stuff her bank account, it won't be because she's told lie upon lie, committed perjury, no if Hillary loses it will be the FBI's fault THAT'S the point of this thread. Just as they blamed the SCOTUS for Al Gore's loss. God I hope she loses if only to watch the left's heads exploded for 4 years. :laugh:
 
I'd say the playing field became a lot more level this past week. As one that doesn't care for either, I'd like to see something put the fear of God into at least one of these candidates.


They did the same thing during the Carter/Reagan race--polls tightening--all the way to election day and it was a major blowout, Reagan won in a landslide.

th


1. The media will keep it tight so that candidates won't pull their adds.
2. If one candidate has big lead over the other, supporters would get complacent and many wouldn't vote.
3. The media would be accused of undermining the election process.

Also keep in mind that only one in ten people will pick up on unknown callers. Trump supporters would be more apt to do that than Clinton supporters, simply because he's behind.
Flaws in Polling Data Exposed as U.S. Campaign Season Heats Up

So my prediction is a landslide victory for Hillary Clinton on Tuesday night, or something that looks similar to this.

1964PresElect.jpg

#NeverTrump: We Told You He Would Kill Us, but You Didn’t Listen
You Wanted Trump, You’ve Got Him | The American Spectator

I just don't think that this country is that ignorant, bigoted & fearful. I think a Trump supporter is more of a Hillary Clinton hater, than they are a Trump supporter, and much of it comes because, they just can't stand the thought of the 1st woman President.
 
581d5031190000a304c31093.jpeg


It Sure Looks Like FBI Renegades Are Trying To Swing The Presidential Election

One of the most unsettling developments yet in a campaign filled with them.

Three days before a historic election, a disturbing twist has emerged: the possibility that agents in the country’s preeminent investigative service are attempting to swing the outcome.

Reuters reported on Thursday that FBI Director James Comey wrote his unprecedented letter to Congress last week in part because he feared his own employees might leak word of the Hillary Clinton email investigation to the press. Two sources told Reuters that investigators in the FBI’s New York field office are “known to be hostile” to Clinton. On Thursday, The Guardian reported its sources described the FBI as a “Trumpland,” where agents have “deep antipathy” toward Clinton.

Those reports follow a whirlwind week of leaks from the FBI that appear intended to cast a shadow over Clinton.
  • On Sunday, The Wall Street Journal reported that FBI investigators had looked into the Clinton Foundation and were frustrated that senior law enforcement officials and career anti-corruption prosecutors were not impressed by the results. So frustrated, it seems, that details of their investigation ended up in a news report less than 10 days before Election Day.

  • The leaks continued days later. A story in the Journal on Wednesday revealed more information about the investigation.

  • Fox News reported on Wednesday that FBI sources said that the Clinton Foundation case is moving toward “likely an indictment.” The story was widely refuted by other media organizations. (Fox anchor Bret Baier apologized for the report on Friday, calling it a “mistake.”)

  • On Friday, Donald Trump surrogate Rudy Giuliani, who claims deep connectionsto the FBI, admitted that the Trump campaign knew about the FBI’s review of additional emails before Comey’s letter. “I thought it was going to be about three or four weeks ago,” he said of the FBI director’s announcement. Hours later, Giuliani backpedaled and said he knew nothing of FBI leaks.
The leaks would be alarming under any circumstances. The Department of Justice typically does not comment on ongoing probes. “Except in exceptional circumstances, the department will not even acknowledge the existence of an investigation,” former Attorney General Eric Holder wrote on Sunday. For such leaks to occur so close to an election is a further breach of DOJ guidance, which advises officials with questions “regarding the timing of charges or overt investigative steps near the time of a primary or general election” to contact the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division.

The FBI’s history is littered with unsavory acts ― from blackmailing Martin Luther King Jr. to eavesdropping on at least 12 Supreme Court justices. The decision by some of its agents to intervene in the most high-stakes election in generations joins that odious list. In a campaign that has seen the steady erosion of longstanding political norms, this is one of the most unsettling developments yet.

More: It Sure Looks Like FBI Renegades Are Trying To Swing The Presidential Election

Comey's FBI is reminding me of all the sordid past history of the FBI - such as the days of J. Edgar Hoover.


Classified information was found on Anthony Wiener's computer while NYPD is investigating him for child pornography...
 
It's been reported as far back as 2000 that Clinton's campaign manager collected pedophile "art", and now there bizarre revelantions in wikileaks.

I consider ice cream, its purchase, and its consumption a rather serious business. We can’t just willy-nilly toss it out and about in casual references, especially linked with the word “free”.
RE: Ice cream for FREE (time) today! - WikiLeaks

Lo and behold, instead of pasta and wonderful sauces, it was a lovely, tempting assortment of cheeses, Yummy. I am awaiting the return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that we can demolish them.
Did you leave a handkerchief - WikiLeaks

This is nuts.


 
581d5031190000a304c31093.jpeg


It Sure Looks Like FBI Renegades Are Trying To Swing The Presidential Election

One of the most unsettling developments yet in a campaign filled with them.

Three days before a historic election, a disturbing twist has emerged: the possibility that agents in the country’s preeminent investigative service are attempting to swing the outcome.

Reuters reported on Thursday that FBI Director James Comey wrote his unprecedented letter to Congress last week in part because he feared his own employees might leak word of the Hillary Clinton email investigation to the press. Two sources told Reuters that investigators in the FBI’s New York field office are “known to be hostile” to Clinton. On Thursday, The Guardian reported its sources described the FBI as a “Trumpland,” where agents have “deep antipathy” toward Clinton.

Those reports follow a whirlwind week of leaks from the FBI that appear intended to cast a shadow over Clinton.
  • On Sunday, The Wall Street Journal reported that FBI investigators had looked into the Clinton Foundation and were frustrated that senior law enforcement officials and career anti-corruption prosecutors were not impressed by the results. So frustrated, it seems, that details of their investigation ended up in a news report less than 10 days before Election Day.

  • The leaks continued days later. A story in the Journal on Wednesday revealed more information about the investigation.

  • Fox News reported on Wednesday that FBI sources said that the Clinton Foundation case is moving toward “likely an indictment.” The story was widely refuted by other media organizations. (Fox anchor Bret Baier apologized for the report on Friday, calling it a “mistake.”)

  • On Friday, Donald Trump surrogate Rudy Giuliani, who claims deep connectionsto the FBI, admitted that the Trump campaign knew about the FBI’s review of additional emails before Comey’s letter. “I thought it was going to be about three or four weeks ago,” he said of the FBI director’s announcement. Hours later, Giuliani backpedaled and said he knew nothing of FBI leaks.
The leaks would be alarming under any circumstances. The Department of Justice typically does not comment on ongoing probes. “Except in exceptional circumstances, the department will not even acknowledge the existence of an investigation,” former Attorney General Eric Holder wrote on Sunday. For such leaks to occur so close to an election is a further breach of DOJ guidance, which advises officials with questions “regarding the timing of charges or overt investigative steps near the time of a primary or general election” to contact the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division.

The FBI’s history is littered with unsavory acts ― from blackmailing Martin Luther King Jr. to eavesdropping on at least 12 Supreme Court justices. The decision by some of its agents to intervene in the most high-stakes election in generations joins that odious list. In a campaign that has seen the steady erosion of longstanding political norms, this is one of the most unsettling developments yet.

More: It Sure Looks Like FBI Renegades Are Trying To Swing The Presidential Election

Comey's FBI is reminding me of all the sordid past history of the FBI - such as the days of J. Edgar Hoover.


Classified information was found on Anthony Wiener's computer while NYPD is investigating him for child pornography...

No you don't know that. I fact, we don't even know if there were any emails on Anthony Weiners device as yet. Comey did not have possession of any of these emails, and he certainly wasn't in a big rush to get them, because as of Sunday night-2-1/2 days after he made this announcement he hadn't even filed a motion to obtain them. Since Huma already testified that she forwarded emails to her server to print out they very well could be emails that the FBI has already reviewed.

And Comey could have been set up by the New York City FBI office also. Claiming there was something there when there wasn't.

But be assured after Hillary Clinton kicks Trump ass on Tuesday, and Democrats take over the Senate, they're first order of business on January 20, 2017 will be a Senate Judiciary investigation & hearing with all involved in this.
 
The best lies always have a grain of truth.

The Haiti thing is inexcusable.

I don't trust Hillary, she's careless

Trump has the right message and he is a successful businessman, I think he can do the job

This is where I stand.
 
Comey's FBI is reminding me of all the sordid past history of the FBI - such as the days of J. Edgar Hoover.

But when Loretta had a meeting with Bill and Comey declared afterwards that Hillary was just a bit careless with her emails that same FBI was acting professionally and not trying to influence anything at all?

:spinner:
 

Forum List

Back
Top