What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FBI erectws barricades around building

The Duke

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
2,050
Points
1,893

Leo123

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
20,528
Reaction score
13,427
Points
1,415

The crooks running the FBI are either scared that they have gone too far or are trying to build another BS narrative that President Trump and the bulk of America that support him are violent radicals.

Pretty soon, DC is going to have a wall around it!!!
They're doing what all libtards do, when outed for their lawlessness, they claim victimhood.
 

Lesh

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
47,020
Reaction score
20,131
Points
2,300
That’s what You leftists said with the Russian Collusion warrant. Turns out is was a pack of lies. Release the cause for the warrant.
Has anyone said that FISA warrant would not have been issued were it not for Klinesmith's addition?
 

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
6,234
Reaction score
5,413
Points
1,938
% in deep red Kansas that voted down a anti-abortion amendment. This is what Republicans are becoming.
Or perhaps the problem was how the language on the ballot was so confusing.


***snip***

Consitutional Amendment
Vote Yes or No
Explanatory statement. The Value Them Both Amendment would affirm there is no Kansas constitutional right to abortion or to require the government funding of abortion, and would reserve to the people of Kansas, through their elected state legislators, the right to pass laws to regulate abortion, including, but not limited to, in circumstances of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or when necessary to save the life of the mother.
A vote for the Value Them Both Amendment would affirm there is no Kansas constitutional right to abortionor to require the government funding of abortion, and would reserve to the people of Kansas, through their elected state legislators, the right to pass laws to regulate abortion.
A vote against the Value Them Both Amendment would make no changes to the constitution of the state of Kansas, and could restrict the people, through their elected state legislators, from regulating abortion by leaving in place the recently recognized right to abortion.
22. Regulation of abortion.Because Kansans value both women and children, the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion. To the extent permitted by the constitution of the United States, the people, through their elected state representatives and state senators, may pass laws regarding abortion, including, but not limited to, laws that account for circumstances of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or circumstances of necessity to save the life of the mother



Yes
No
 

Lesh

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
47,020
Reaction score
20,131
Points
2,300
Or perhaps the problem was how the language on the ballot was so confusing.


***snip***

Consitutional Amendment
Vote Yes or No
Explanatory statement. The Value Them Both Amendment would affirm there is no Kansas constitutional right to abortion or to require the government funding of abortion, and would reserve to the people of Kansas, through their elected state legislators, the right to pass laws to regulate abortion, including, but not limited to, in circumstances of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or when necessary to save the life of the mother.
A vote for the Value Them Both Amendment would affirm there is no Kansas constitutional right to abortionor to require the government funding of abortion, and would reserve to the people of Kansas, through their elected state legislators, the right to pass laws to regulate abortion.
A vote against the Value Them Both Amendment would make no changes to the constitution of the state of Kansas, and could restrict the people, through their elected state legislators, from regulating abortion by leaving in place the recently recognized right to abortion.
22. Regulation of abortion.Because Kansans value both women and children, the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion. To the extent permitted by the constitution of the United States, the people, through their elected state representatives and state senators, may pass laws regarding abortion, including, but not limited to, laws that account for circumstances of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or circumstances of necessity to save the life of the mother



Yes
No
Republicans tried to make it confusing but Liberals figured it out and came out in huge numbers.

FAIL
 

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
6,234
Reaction score
5,413
Points
1,938
Republicans tried to make it confusing but Liberals figured it out and came out in huge numbers.

FAIL
I see no problem with individual states deciding if they want legal abortion or not.
 

Lesh

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
47,020
Reaction score
20,131
Points
2,300
I see no problem with individual states deciding if they want legal abortion or not.
So you have no problem with forcing women to deliver headless babies?
 

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
6,234
Reaction score
5,413
Points
1,938
So you have no problem with forcing women to deliver headless babies?
Obviously I have not spent a lot of time researching abortions, however if a state can pass laws allowing abortion it can also pass laws regulating the manner in which they are carried out and limits on when they can be preformed.
 

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
6,234
Reaction score
5,413
Points
1,938
Republicans tried to make it confusing but Liberals figured it out and came out in huge numbers.

FAIL
Well good for you. That’s the way the system is supposed to work. I have no problem with liberals winnning as long as they win without rigging elections. The same goes for conservatives, of course.
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
26,890
Reaction score
6,808
Points
290
Democrats paid for the riots, you chump.

The rioters were their people.




Show your stupidity.
 

Lesh

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
47,020
Reaction score
20,131
Points
2,300
Obviously I have not spent a lot of time researching abortions, however if a state can pass laws allowing abortion it can also pass laws regulating the manner in which they are carried out and limits on when they can be preformed.
And that's the problem
 

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
6,234
Reaction score
5,413
Points
1,938
To most people being forced to deliver a headless baby is a problem
Well then they can pass laws in their state forbidding it.
 

Lesh

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
47,020
Reaction score
20,131
Points
2,300
Well then they can pass laws in their state forbidding it.
This kind of thing should never happen.

Period.

Before the over turn of Roe...they didn't
 

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
6,234
Reaction score
5,413
Points
1,938
This kind of thing should never happen.

Period.

Before the over turn of Roe...they didn't
I don’t remember ever hearing of a woman being forced to deliver a headless baby. If that happens I imagine new legislation will be proposed shortly.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top