Evidence of NY Times distorted Best Sellers List

Surely you are aware that books "written" by conservatives are very often purchased in bulk, never get read by anyone and end up polluting a landfill somewhere. Bulk sales rightfully should not count the same as individual purchases.
 
Surely you are aware that books "written" by conservatives are very often purchased in bulk, never get read by anyone and end up polluting a landfill somewhere. Bulk sales rightfully should not count the same as individual purchases.
Link?
 
Are you serious? This is how it works. If you are a politician your PAC can't give you any money but they can buy a half-a-million copies of your ghost written double spaced, wide margined, totally forgettable "book".
 
Surely you are aware that books "written" by conservatives are very often purchased in bulk, never get read by anyone and end up polluting a landfill somewhere. Bulk sales rightfully should not count the same as individual purchases.

Surely you have not read the evidence in the article, plus RFK Jr as a "conservative" - what nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Surely you have not read the evidence in the article, plus RFK Jr is a "conservative" - what nonsense.
The article is disingenuous at best not to mention the bulk sales angle.
 
1641343595565.png
 
Surely you are aware that books "written" by conservatives are very often purchased in bulk, never get read by anyone and end up polluting a landfill somewhere. Bulk sales rightfully should not count the same as individual purchases.

You mean like how Cuomo's book only published about 25,000 copies, most of which were purchased in bulk and are sitting in a warehouse unread and unopened?

At least republicans aren't forced by federal judges to return the proceeds they make from their books because they illegally used taxpayers money to produce them like fucking libtards do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top