Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So how many judges have decided against the election denier craziness? You really think they are all biased?I knew these stooge judges were going to throw out the lawsuits. The point here is the cases were DISMISSED by biased judges. There was obviously enough factual evidence of election tampering to merit HEARING THE CASES. That's all we are saying. The cases were arbitrarily tossed and that is wrong.
Perhaps... but since it ALWAYS benefits the Left, you don't have a case to argue. Just don't be too shocked it those on the Right don't start doing the same shit in '24 including massing in the streets and fighting.
AZ Judge Peter Thompson Rules That Elections with Sudden Machine Malfunctions in 60% of Precincts – All Republican – No Chain of Custody, Are Free, Fair and Certifiable.
This is the standard for US elections from now on UPDATE: Via NBC News 12: “‘The Court DOES NOT find clear and convincing evidence of misconduct’: Judge rules against Kari Lake…coronanews123.wordpress.com
"Apparently Judge Thompson did not find the following to be “clear and convincing evidence of misconduct“:
- Violation of state law under the Elections Procedures Manual (EPM) was to have “Contingency Plans” if waits to vote went “significantly” over “30 minutes.” In this election those waits were almost exclusively in Republican-leaning precinct, showing not just incompetence but clear and undeniable intent to disenfranchise one class of voters.
- Active interference in normal election processes aimed at changing the results, according to a Maricopa County official’s testimony at trial that the ballot printer settings which made the tabulators reject ballots were changed on election day, after test runs of all the equipment were fine the night before."
Judge Peter Thompson
I knew these stooge judges were going to throw out the lawsuits. The point here is the cases were DISMISSED by biased judges. There was obviously enough factual evidence of election tampering to merit HEARING THE CASES. That's all we are saying. The cases were arbitrarily tossed and that is wrong.
Try again.You are nothing but a kook. Anyone who rules against you is biased. Never mind that the judges are following established law.
Apparently you haven't been looking in the direction of DC latelyThe only part of that making sense is the part about your broken and highly flawed system.
The right in America don't want fair elections, they want the dysfunctional babbling of a sociopathic narcissist.
And they want to take their guns to the streets, but the narcissist won't lead AGAIN!
Yeah really? Where?Democrats had several "star witnesses" turn out to be full of shit. The right has their own "star witnesses".
I'm not sure it's so much corruption as it is cowardice.At this point we could have a poll worker confess to tampering, and these corrupt judges would say they had no intent.
I'm not sure it's so much corruption as it is cowardice.
Plus, judges are not allowed to consider statistics. Because these are criminal allegations.
The votes were eventually counted.
I knew these stooge judges were going to throw out the lawsuits. The point here is the cases were DISMISSED by biased judges. There was obviously enough factual evidence of election tampering to merit HEARING THE CASES. That's all we are saying. The cases were arbitrarily tossed and that is wrong.
they already had GOVT workers who stated the 2022 machine settings to 19" had to be Intentional. not important said stooge judge Thompson.At this point we could have a poll worker confess to tampering, and these corrupt judges would say they had no intent.
So how does one prove 'intent'?
There is no way we are ever going to redo a Presidential election. If we tried, it would be at best a nightmare and could turn bloody. We might have another Civil War or states would simply leave the Union.The killer is that even if you are not sure this proves INTENT, what could it hurt to err on the side of caution and redo the election?
The very worst that could happen is that you'd prove there was indeed no intent to defraud when everyone came in and re-voted the same as they did the first time and you got a similar outcome!
That is not the point, and you don't know that.The votes were eventually counted.
Exactly.Their state LAW requires an unbroken, verifiable CHAIN OF CUSTODY. The ballots from each polling station were to be tallied before being physically moved to a central location. That NEVER HAPPENED. As a result, any number of faked, forged, false ballots could have been added prior to the official count. The most important part of this is the fact that we all KNOW, your party would be gathering in the feckin' streets screaming and burning shit if it cost YOU an election. Looks like plans need to be made for 2024 to be ready on the Right to do the same thing.
