Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory

abu afak

ALLAH SNACKBAR!
Mar 3, 2006
7,171
2,544
315
"Intelligent Falling"... "Evangelical Physics".
No more far fetched than "ID" and other fertilizer regularly posted here by 7-Eleven Adventists and other literal 'believers'.

Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory
ISSUE 41•33
Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory | The Onion - America's Finest News Source

KANSAS CITY, KS—As the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools continues, a new controversy over the science curriculum arose Monday in this embattled Midwestern state. Scientists from the Evangelical Center For Faith-Based Reasoning are now asserting that the long-held "Theory of Gravity" is flawed, and they have responded to it with a new theory of Intelligent Falling.

Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, applied Scripture, and physics from Oral Roberts University.

Burdett added: "Gravity—which is taught to our children as a law—is founded on great gaps in understanding. The laws predict the mutual force between all bodies of mass, but they cannot explain that force. Isaac Newton himself said, 'I suspect that my theories may all depend upon a force for which philosophers have searched all of nature in vain.' Of course, he is alluding to a higher power."

Founded in 1987, the ECFR is the world's leading institution of evangelical physics, a branch of physics based on literal interpretation of the Bible.

According to the ECFR paper published simultaneously this week in the International Journal Of Science and the adolescent magazine God's Word For Teens!, there are many phenomena that cannot be explained by secular gravity alone, including such mysteries as how Angels fly, how Jesus ascended into Heaven, and how Satan fell when cast out of Paradise.

The ECFR, in conjunction with the Christian Coalition and other Christian conservative action groups, is calling for public-school curriculums to give equal time to the Intelligent Falling theory. They insist they are not asking that the theory of gravity be banned from schools, but only that students be offered both sides of the issue "so they can make an informed decision.".....​
`
 
This guy s why the left is so easily manipulated. Even when exposed, they still double down on stupid. -- nutty luddite
 
This guy s why the left is so easily manipulated. Even when exposed, they still double down on stupid. -- nutty luddite


WHOOOSH!!

Right over your head.

My post pointed out how "easily manipulated" fundies are.

You just proved that RWNJs are as well.
 
Last edited:
This guy s why the left is so easily manipulated. Even when exposed, they still double down on stupid. -- nutty luddite


WHOOOSH!!

Right over your head.

My post pointed out how "easily manipulated" fundies are.

You just proved that RWNJs are as well.
We have a New Fundie on the board masquerading as a Schizophrenic William Lane Craig.

`
 
"Intelligent Falling"... "Evangelical Physics".
No more far fetched than "ID" and other fertilizer regularly posted here by 7-Eleven Adventists and other literal 'believers'.

Now, this is funny. abu afak thought it was real. He's the stupidest and worst of the worst :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:.
 
Now, this is funny. abu afak thought it was real. He's the stupidest and worst of the worst :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:.
You need to be in an institution, or maybe just debriefed at the "I use to be a Jesus Freak Camp."
Your posts are all BS.
all Circular reasoning.
God-Bible-God-Bible-God-Bible.

There is no real evidence for god and Sober/sane Christians know their beliefs are FAITH, not an arguable fact.
`
 
Last edited:
Now, this is funny. abu afak thought it was real. He's the stupidest and worst of the worst :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:.
You need to be in an institution, or maybe just debriefed at the "I use to be a Jesus Freak Camp."
Your posts are all BS.
all Circular reasoning.
God-Bible-God-Bible-God-Bible.

There is no real evidence for god and Sober/sane Christians know their beliefs are FAITH, not an arguable fact.
`

>>There is no real evidence for god and Sober/sane Christians know their beliefs are FAITH, not an arguable fact.<<

The fact that one can choose the real Christian God (by science and biblical evidence). It isn't atheistic fatalism which claims that God's sovereignity is not determined by free will, but by determinism, fatalism, indeterminishm, or a combination of the three. Everyone has a choice whether to believe or not in God.

Choosing the Christian God isn't circular reasoning because science backs up the Bible despite it is not a science book. If the Bible's origins were not true, then it would've been debunked by now using science and history, e.g. Jesus' Resurrection did not happen, humans live longer now than in the past, or events in the Bible did not happen. For example, why do we find evidence of a global flood such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge which circles the planet or ancient civilizations buried beneath the ocean? IOW, we would've found physical evidence of evolution already such as transitional fossils or more evidence for it such as dinosaurs and humans did not live together.
 
>>There is no real evidence for god and Sober/sane Christians know their beliefs are FAITH, not an arguable fact.<<

The fact that one can choose the real Christian God (by science and biblical evidence). It isn't atheistic fatalism which claims that God's sovereignity is not determined by free will, but by determinism, fatalism, indeterminishm, or a combination of the three. Everyone has a choice whether to believe or not in God.

Choosing the Christian God isn't circular reasoning because science backs up the Bible despite it is not a science book. If the Bible's origins were not true, then it would've been debunked by now using science and history, e.g. Jesus' Resurrection did not happen, humans live longer now than in the past, or events in the Bible did not happen. For example, why do we find evidence of a global flood such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge which circles the planet or ancient civilizations buried beneath the ocean? IOW, we would've found physical evidence of evolution already such as transitional fossils or more evidence for it such as dinosaurs and humans did not live together.
You're delusional/mentally ill, and terminally indoctrinated.

There is NO scientific evidence for god. (your's or anyone else's)
There is NO scientific evidence for NOAH'S FLOOD.
The "mid-atlantic Ridge" has NOTHING to do with a flood.
On dry land we have Rift Valleys that also have nothing do with it.

There is no evidence of a Global flood since 'Noah' nor anytime in millions of years previous.
There's isn't enough water FOR a global flood.
You'd have to have multiples more water than exists.

If all the world's Ice melted it would only raise sea level 200.'
Jerusalem sits at 2575 Feet ABOVE sea level with no dig evidence of any flood.
Everest at 30,000 ft.



`
 
Last edited:
You're delusional/mentally ill, and terminally indoctrinated.

You shouldn't talk about your mother, father, and family like that.

There is NO scientific evidence for god. (your's or anyone else's)
There is NO scientific evidence for NOAH'S FLOOD.
The "mid-atlantic Ridge" has NOTHING to do with a flood.
On dry land we have Rift Valleys that also have nothing do with it.

There is no evidence of a Global flood since 'Noah' nor anytime in millions of years previous.
There's isn't enough water FOR a global flood.
You'd have to have multiples more water than exists.

If all the world's Ice melted it would only raise sea level 200.'
Jerusalem sits at 2575 Feet ABOVE sea level with no dig evidence of any flood.
Everest at 30,000 ft.

This has been explained before. The water came up from the oceans below the surface of the Earth (fountains of the deep). The Mid-Atlantic Ridge shows how the water came up from underneath the oceans and seas. You should know b/c this is one of the things your atheist scientists look for when searching for aliens or life on another planet. Either I caught you in a lie or you are a hypocrite. The evidence shows a global flood as we find entire civilizations under the ocean.

Furthermore, it rained for forty days and forty nights. They did not have any levees to contain the water nor a way to channel the water elsewhere. There was just too much water. The flood explains why our planet is covered by 3/4 water. According to you, we can't explain that. Catastrophism and plate tectonics is what raised the Himalayas and created Mt. Everest. I doubt you find them on any ancients maps.

Atheists and their scientists are usually wrong and I've showed that you are wrong in front of all these people. Why do you ignore or don't believe evidence for God when you cry for the evidence all the time? We didn't know about plate tectonics and how mountain ranges are made and now we do. Glaciers can't do it because we can't see it happen at all. Why do you believe stuff like that when there is no evidence and we can't see it happen b/c of long time (to you anyway)?
 
1613088933978.png
 
It's pretty sad when militant atheists want to argue about God in a science and technology forum.

Who said they aren't triggered by God :dunno:
 
It's pretty sad when militant atheists want to argue about God in a science and technology forum.

Who said they aren't triggered by God :dunno:
What is sad is that so many functioning adults believe this magical horseshit, prompting discussions like this topic.
 
It's pretty sad when militant atheists want to argue about God in a science and technology forum.

Who said they aren't triggered by God :dunno:
What is sad is that so many functioning adults believe this magical horseshit, prompting discussions like this topic.
What's laughable are all these Brainwashed Parochial schoolboys and 'Evangelical science' (LOL) experts trying to legitimize their illegitimate cult devotion.

`
 
It's pretty sad when militant atheists want to argue about God in a science and technology forum.

Who said they aren't triggered by God :dunno:
What is sad is that so many functioning adults believe this magical horseshit, prompting discussions like this topic.
What's laughable are all these Brainwashed Parochial schoolboys and 'Evangelical science' (LOL) experts trying to legitimize their illegitimate cult devotion.

`
When you pretended to be in Mensa was pretty laughable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top