End the lockdown...look at Sweden

BuckRodgers

Active Member
Oct 15, 2020
79
166
33
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK

 
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK



Sweden did take steps to mitigate the disease. They had mixed results. Compared to their Scandinavian neighbors, they have a higher rate of infection per 100,000 citizens.
But they are doing much better than we are. The big difference is that their citizens listened to the experts and adhered to the steps the Swedish government took.
 
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK



Sweden did take steps to mitigate the disease. They had mixed results. Compared to their Scandinavian neighbors, they have a higher rate of infection per 100,000 citizens.
But they are doing much better than we are. The big difference is that their citizens listened to the experts and adhered to the steps the Swedish government took.


Rate of infection means nothing really, that is largely based on testing. Look at deaths and you see that allowing the virus to run its course with healthy people, while shielding the unhealthy, has vastly outperformed EVERY other approach across the globe.

Why are we not doing that? Did you see the Link? -How do you explain that?
 
Masks, no mask, many experts are now changing their minds about the virus the more we learn.
The way the Dems politicized this is sickening.
Trump accused a reporter of being "politically correct" for wearing a mask.
But, sure...tell us more about how the Dems politicised the pandemic?

AOC said that we should lock the entire place down so that democrats can win.

That's how.
 
Masks, no mask, many experts are now changing their minds about the virus the more we learn.
The way the Dems politicized this is sickening.
Trump accused a reporter of being "politically correct" for wearing a mask.
But, sure...tell us more about how the Dems politicised the pandemic?
LMAO!!! What?
 
Masks, no mask, many experts are now changing their minds about the virus the more we learn.
The way the Dems politicized this is sickening.
Trump accused a reporter of being "politically correct" for wearing a mask.
But, sure...tell us more about how the Dems politicised the pandemic?

Look at the performance of blue states and red states. Dems have done a terrible job which is why they have higher death rates.
 
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK



Sweden did take steps to mitigate the disease. They had mixed results. Compared to their Scandinavian neighbors, they have a higher rate of infection per 100,000 citizens.
But they are doing much better than we are. The big difference is that their citizens listened to the experts and adhered to the steps the Swedish government took.


Rate of infection means nothing really, that is largely based on testing. Look at deaths and you see that allowing the virus to run its course with healthy people, while shielding the unhealthy, has vastly outperformed EVERY other approach across the globe.

Why are we not doing that? Did you see the Link? -How do you explain that?

Except a lot of people with pre-existing conditions are not aware of the PEC. So when you say "shield the unhealthy" you're likely not going to get those who don't know they have heart disease or diabetes.
 
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK



Sweden did take steps to mitigate the disease. They had mixed results. Compared to their Scandinavian neighbors, they have a higher rate of infection per 100,000 citizens.
But they are doing much better than we are. The big difference is that their citizens listened to the experts and adhered to the steps the Swedish government took.


Rate of infection means nothing really, that is largely based on testing. Look at deaths and you see that allowing the virus to run its course with healthy people, while shielding the unhealthy, has vastly outperformed EVERY other approach across the globe.

Why are we not doing that? Did you see the Link? -How do you explain that?

Except a lot of people with pre-existing conditions are not aware of the PEC. So when you say "shield the unhealthy" you're likely not going to get those who don't know they have heart disease or diabetes.


Did you look at the link I posted? How do you explain the total deaths by year for Sweden? What happened to their heart disease and diabetes folks this year?
 
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK



Sweden did take steps to mitigate the disease. They had mixed results. Compared to their Scandinavian neighbors, they have a higher rate of infection per 100,000 citizens.
But they are doing much better than we are. The big difference is that their citizens listened to the experts and adhered to the steps the Swedish government took.


Rate of infection means nothing really, that is largely based on testing. Look at deaths and you see that allowing the virus to run its course with healthy people, while shielding the unhealthy, has vastly outperformed EVERY other approach across the globe.

Why are we not doing that? Did you see the Link? -How do you explain that?

Except a lot of people with pre-existing conditions are not aware of the PEC. So when you say "shield the unhealthy" you're likely not going to get those who don't know they have heart disease or diabetes.


Did you look at the link I posted? How do you explain the total deaths by year for Sweden? What happened to their heart disease and diabetes folks this year?


You asked why we don't do that here.... I told you.
 
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK



Sweden did take steps to mitigate the disease. They had mixed results. Compared to their Scandinavian neighbors, they have a higher rate of infection per 100,000 citizens.
But they are doing much better than we are. The big difference is that their citizens listened to the experts and adhered to the steps the Swedish government took.


Rate of infection means nothing really, that is largely based on testing. Look at deaths and you see that allowing the virus to run its course with healthy people, while shielding the unhealthy, has vastly outperformed EVERY other approach across the globe.

Why are we not doing that? Did you see the Link? -How do you explain that?

Except a lot of people with pre-existing conditions are not aware of the PEC. So when you say "shield the unhealthy" you're likely not going to get those who don't know they have heart disease or diabetes.


Did you look at the link I posted? How do you explain the total deaths by year for Sweden? What happened to their heart disease and diabetes folks this year?


You asked why we don't do that here.... I told you.


I understand. Well they aren't going to know they have heart disease if they are too afraid to go to the hospitals to get screened. Sweden has the best results, and I'm just saying that not only should we follow their example but we should ask why their deaths haven't increased this years even though they have stayed open.
 
How are we putting up with this any more? Check this link to see the total deaths year by year for Sweden, who did NOT lock down, and are totally back to normal. Spoiler alert, they are doing better than anyone else.

Sweden Total Deaths by Year...What does this mean?
"Given all the politics around how c19 deaths are or are not labeled, looking at total deaths can be useful. I graphed Sweden's total deaths per million for Jan-Sept, over 7 years. As the only western country not to lock down, why aren't more people driven to learn from Sweden?" - Yinon Weiss
LINK


There's no lockdown in the United States.
 
Masks, no mask, many experts are now changing their minds about the virus the more we learn.
The way the Dems politicized this is sickening.
Trump accused a reporter of being "politically correct" for wearing a mask.
But, sure...tell us more about how the Dems politicised the pandemic?

AOC said that we should lock the entire place down so that democrats can win.

That's how.
Of course you know that's bullshit...and of course you don't care.
 
Masks, no mask, many experts are now changing their minds about the virus the more we learn.
The way the Dems politicized this is sickening.
Trump accused a reporter of being "politically correct" for wearing a mask.
But, sure...tell us more about how the Dems politicised the pandemic?

AOC said that we should lock the entire place down so that democrats can win.

That's how.
Of course you know that's bullshit...and of course you don't care.

That was on her twitter feed.

If you want to ponder more meaningful questions how about: "How is she still not deported?"
 
Masks, no mask, many experts are now changing their minds about the virus the more we learn.
The way the Dems politicized this is sickening.
Trump accused a reporter of being "politically correct" for wearing a mask.
But, sure...tell us more about how the Dems politicised the pandemic?

AOC said that we should lock the entire place down so that democrats can win.

That's how.
Of course you know that's bullshit...and of course you don't care.

That was on her twitter feed.

If you want to ponder more meaningful questions how about: "How is she still not deported?"
Yeah, nah, it wasn't.
There was a post looking like her twitter doing the rounds but it was never on her feed.
It's not hard to check these things Politwoops
 
Reading between the lines of a recent Dana White interview (friend of the President and in charge of the UFC, one of the only sports that continued to function during the Fauci-inspired lockdown), he seems to be convinced once President Trump is re-elected, he is going to dump the fraud Fauci and is not going to tolerate the very sick, America-hating, democrat governors imposing unconstitutional, unscientific lock downs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top