Electoral College Breakdown

Status
Not open for further replies.
They visited all the places they wanted to visit that the Iranians felt like letting them visit.

So where's your proof they were violating the agreement? you don't have any.

One more time, you guys INSISTED up and down Saddam had nukes, but he didn't. 5000 dead Americans and a million dead Iraqis later, you guys have to really have more convincing evidence before you try that shit again.
 
Or any legal obligation to return it, especially if they spend money on terrorism and nukes.

Actually, the courts had ruled that money should be returned... numerous times.

Based on non-inspections, ignoring military facilities and their previous violations.

No, based on actual inspections.

“Iran is implementing its nuclear commitments,” said Yukiya Amano, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in March 4 remarks to the agency’s Board of Governors. Amano urged Tehran to continue adhering to the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

The United States, which withdrew from the agreement in 2018, levied new sanctions on March 22 against Iran’s Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, purported to employ staff from Iran’s past nuclear weapons research activities.

The IAEA quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear program, released publicly just days after Amano’s statement, contains additional details demonstrating that Iran is abiding by the deal’s terms. It notes that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium is below the 300-kilogram cap set by the JCPOA and that Iran has not enriched uranium above the limit of 3.67 percent uranium-235, far below the 90 percent level considered useful for weapons purposes.

The report notes that the agency has had access to “all the sites and locations in Iran which it needed to visit.”


Actually, the courts had ruled that money should be returned... numerous times.

And no President had actually returned the money. Until that idiot Obama.

No, based on actual inspections.

How many facilities on military bases were inspected?

The report notes that the agency has had access to “all the sites and locations in Iran which it needed to visit.”

Because it didn't "need" to visit any military sites, eh?
Iran objected to visiting military sites because it compromised their military security. We would not allow foreign nations to inspect our military sites.
That in no way means those sites are being used to build nuclear weapons.

We had access to many other locations where we could verify shipments, documentation, storage which could determine if a nuclear program was being conducted.

Trump said he would do better. All he did was make sure we had no inspections
 
Because it didn't "need" to visit any military sites, eh?

Well, obviously they visited all the placed they needed to visit.

If Trump had ANY evidence nuclear research was going on anywhere else, we'd have heard about it. But even his own State Department conceded they were in compliance.

Well, obviously they visited all the placed they needed to visit.

They visited all the places they wanted to visit that the Iranians felt like letting them visit.
Now, thanks to Trump, they can’t visit at all

Before, they were free to trade with everyone and we couldn't inspect their military bases.
Now they can only trade with a few countries and we can't inspect their military bases.

I wonder which scenario makes the mullahs happier?
 
They visited all the places they wanted to visit that the Iranians felt like letting them visit.

So where's your proof they were violating the agreement? you don't have any.

One more time, you guys INSISTED up and down Saddam had nukes, but he didn't. 5000 dead Americans and a million dead Iraqis later, you guys have to really have more convincing evidence before you try that shit again.

So where's your proof they were violating the agreement?

They never cheated before?

One more time, you guys INSISTED up and down Saddam had nukes, but he didn't.


Nukes? Working nuclear weapons? Who insisted that? Link?
 
Or any legal obligation to return it, especially if they spend money on terrorism and nukes.

Actually, the courts had ruled that money should be returned... numerous times.

Based on non-inspections, ignoring military facilities and their previous violations.

No, based on actual inspections.

“Iran is implementing its nuclear commitments,” said Yukiya Amano, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in March 4 remarks to the agency’s Board of Governors. Amano urged Tehran to continue adhering to the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

The United States, which withdrew from the agreement in 2018, levied new sanctions on March 22 against Iran’s Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, purported to employ staff from Iran’s past nuclear weapons research activities.

The IAEA quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear program, released publicly just days after Amano’s statement, contains additional details demonstrating that Iran is abiding by the deal’s terms. It notes that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium is below the 300-kilogram cap set by the JCPOA and that Iran has not enriched uranium above the limit of 3.67 percent uranium-235, far below the 90 percent level considered useful for weapons purposes.

The report notes that the agency has had access to “all the sites and locations in Iran which it needed to visit.”


Actually, the courts had ruled that money should be returned... numerous times.

And no President had actually returned the money. Until that idiot Obama.

No, based on actual inspections.

How many facilities on military bases were inspected?

The report notes that the agency has had access to “all the sites and locations in Iran which it needed to visit.”

Because it didn't "need" to visit any military sites, eh?
Iran objected to visiting military sites because it compromised their military security. We would not allow foreign nations to inspect our military sites.
That in no way means those sites are being used to build nuclear weapons.

We had access to many other locations where we could verify shipments, documentation, storage which could determine if a nuclear program was being conducted.

Trump said he would do better. All he did was make sure we had no inspections

Iran objected to visiting military sites because it compromised their military security.

Not only that, it would have uncovered nuclear work being done at military sites.

We would not allow foreign nations to inspect our military sites.

And?
 
Because America is still a country that bizarrely uses an 18th century anachronism to pick presidents, we have to look at the state by state races.

For sake of this argument, let's assume Biden will get all the states Hillary won for 232 Electoral votes. Let's also assume for the argument that no matter how awful the economy gets, Trump will still 19 safe states, for a total of 123.

That leaves us with the following states in play - WI, MI, PA, NC, AZ, FL, TX, IA, OH, and GA. We can also put in there ME2 and NE2

So I will break them down into three groups.

The Ones Hillary Should have Won- WI, MI, PA - Because she didn't devote resources, because Comey sandbagged her, or because of Russian Shennanigans, Hillary lost these states. So how is Biden doing there.

Well, he's leading in all three.




This is before the full effect of Trump's Recession are hit, and Biden's still ahead. When these folks realize that not only won't they get Daddy's factory job back, they probably won't get to keep that service job they have, it WILL be worse.

Those three will put him over 278, game over, man, game over.

But wait, there's more!

Next up we have the three Hillary tried really hard for - NC, AZ and FL

Biden is competitive in those, and has a firm lead in Arizona.




If he wins those three, he will be up to 333, actually better than Obama did in 2008. Let's throw in Maine2 into that mix, and go with 334.

Then you have the Swinging for the Fences states. These are states the Democrats could potentially win. = IA, OH, TX and GA. Not as much polling data on these from RCP. But what little there is shows Biden could be competitive. Probably a lot more after the bottom completely falls out of the economy. That would bring him up to 413

he's withing 3 points in Texas


5 Points in Iowa


Actually LEADING Trump in Ohio.


Trailing him by 8 points in Georgia, but again- this assumes the economy collapses completely and Trump won't be so popular anymore.





Next up, we have
Holy fucking crying like a bitch, Batman!

Next up we have JoeB131, piece of fucking shit!

His butthurt is absolutely glorious! :auiqs.jpg:

I revel in it!
 
Before, they were free to trade with everyone and we couldn't inspect their military bases.
Now they can only trade with a few countries and we can't inspect their military bases.

I wonder which scenario makes the mullahs happier?

Considering the other countries that made the deal with them are finding ways around our sanctions, the Mullahs are probably thrilled.
 
Before, they were free to trade with everyone and we couldn't inspect their military bases.
Now they can only trade with a few countries and we can't inspect their military bases.

I wonder which scenario makes the mullahs happier?

Considering the other countries that made the deal with them are finding ways around our sanctions, the Mullahs are probably thrilled.

They're so thrilled that Trump left the deal, that they've been whining more than you.
 
So their economy must be doing fine......which explains why they whine more than you.

Again, it doesn't matter if they are or not.

The thing is,- and I know youare stupid because you don't get this - the ONLY thing keeping them from making nukes was that treaty. Now the treaty is gone, they can trade with other countries, and make all the nukes they want.

You didn't think this through at all, did you?
 
So their economy must be doing fine......which explains why they whine more than you.

Again, it doesn't matter if they are or not.

The thing is,- and I know youare stupid because you don't get this - the ONLY thing keeping them from making nukes was that treaty. Now the treaty is gone, they can trade with other countries, and make all the nukes they want.

You didn't think this through at all, did you?

Again, it doesn't matter if they are or not.

You said they were thrilled Trump left the deal, now it doesn't matter?

the ONLY thing keeping them from making nukes was that treaty.

If you think that non-treaty was stopping them, you're dumber than you first appeared.

Now the treaty is gone, they can trade with other countries,

Except for our sanctions.

You didn't think this through at all, did you?

It doesn't take much to see through your ignorance and naivete.
 
If you think that non-treaty was stopping them, you're dumber than you first appeared.

Actually, it was... they made an agreement, we broke it.

More to the point, frankly, with no treaty, they have every incentive to make nukes.

Let's review.

Saddam Gave up his Nukes. - DEAD
Qadaffy gave up his Nukes- DEAD
Kim kept his Nukes - Trump is kissing his ass... probably dead from his own bad life habits, but man, we didn't kill him, did we?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top