Israeli Apartheid

They always accuse Israel
by project their own intentions...`

 
They always accuse Israel
by project their own intentions...`


14 members of the current Israeli government are Arabs. 1 Supreme Court judge. 46% of new doctors are Arabs. The only law that is mandatory upon Jews and not Arabs is military conscription.

No Palestinians?
 
14 members of the current Israeli government are Arabs. 1 Supreme Court judge. 46% of new doctors are Arabs. The only law that is mandatory upon Jews and not Arabs is military conscription.

No Palestinians?
YAWN….. “ No Israelis in Palestine”
 
14 members of the current Israeli government are Arabs. 1 Supreme Court judge. 46% of new doctors are Arabs. The only law that is mandatory upon Jews and not Arabs is military conscription.

No Palestinians?


Tinmore has a problem with reading comprehension

 
14 members of the current Israeli government are Arabs. 1 Supreme Court judge. 46% of new doctors are Arabs. The only law that is mandatory upon Jews and not Arabs is military conscription.

No Palestinians?

Of the 4 main Arab parties in Israel,
one is Social-Communist, another Islamist, and two Arab nationalist,
of which only one identifies with the Arab Palestinian nationalism - the Pan-Arabist faction.

Any of the Palestinian governments
even allow Jewish members?
 
Of the 4 main Arab parties in Israel,
one is Social-Communist, another Islamist, and two Arab nationalist,
of which only one identifies with the Arab Palestinian nationalism - the Pan-Arabist faction.

Any of the Palestinian governments
even allow Jewish members?
You're not going to get a response
 

Apartheid Webinar Series Pt 2: The Occupied Palestinian Territory​


 

Apartheid Webinar Series Pt 2: The Occupied Palestinian Territory​


YAWN… YAWN….. Land that was considered to be part of Jordan and Egypt before they INITIATED the 67 War

They didn’t, Tinmore? Please tell us who closed the Straits
 
RE: Economic and Social Commission for Western AsiaIsraeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid
SUBTOPIC: Misuse of the allegation...
※→ P F TINMORE, et al,

BLUF: Within the first 15 minutes of the presentation, they make a fatal flaw in their argument.

Apartheid Webinar Series Pt.4: Moving to Freedom, Justice and Equality

(COMMENT)

This is the definition of "Apartheid."

✦ "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"
The fourth Element of the Offense in the crime "Apartheid" is found in Article 7 (1) (j)
Crime against humanity of apartheid
The conduct was committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups.​

This is the intent behind that definition (meaning).

"The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted."

The conflict is not between "one racial group over any other racial group" and it is not a case of a crime committed with the intention of maintaining that regime. And the law cannot be twisted just to satisfy the Arab Palestinian need to somehow justify their allegation.

In the (over) 70 years since the establishment of the State of Israel (the Jewish National Home), the regimes over which Israel has been politically controlled have changed 13 times.

Since 1974, when the Seventh Arab League Summit, politically established the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people – the PLO Regime has changed only once in the ensuing half-century (from the Chairmanship of Yasser Arafat to the Chairmanship of Mahmoud Abbas). The PLO was founded in 1964 (57 years ago) with the purpose of the "liberation of Palestine" through armed struggle.

Now what is interesting here is that the people that are fighting to maintain a regime are the Palestinians. Without regard to what the Palestinians say -- what they are doing is completely different. Chairman Abbas is now on the 10th year of his Presidency (if you subscribe to the theory that Abbas assumed power legitimately). But for all practical purposes, Abbas has been the dictator of the territory since his assumption of the PLO chairmanship (the last 17 years).

This strategy is very common among the mouthy Arab Palestinians. And they compound the mistake by trying to impress the audience by a show of numbers in the Palestinian Love Fest they call a "series" as if it were a program of some sort.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
You're not going to get a response

Of course, they won't say a word.

The racist trash lying about Israel, are actually proud
that no Jews or Africans allowed in any of Palestinian govt.
 
Last edited:
RE: Economic and Social Commission for Western AsiaIsraeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid
SUBTOPIC: Misuse of the allegation...
※→ P F TINMORE, et al,

BLUF: Within the first 15 minutes of the presentation, they make a fatal flaw in their argument.


(COMMENT)

This is the definition of "Apartheid."


✦ "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;"
The fourth Element of the Offense in the crime "Apartheid" is found in Article 7 (1) (j)​
The conduct was committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups.​

This is the intent behind that definition (meaning).

"The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted."

The conflict is not between "one racial group over any other racial group" and it is not a case of a crime committed with the intention of maintaining that regime. And the law cannot be twisted just to satisfy the Arab Palestinian need to somehow justify their allegation.

In the (over) 70 years since the establishment of the State of Israel (the Jewish National Home), the regimes over which Israel has been politically controlled have changed 13 times.

Since 1974, when the Seventh Arab League Summit, politically established the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people – the PLO Regime has changed only once in the ensuing half-century (from the Chairmanship of Yasser Arafat to the Chairmanship of Mahmoud Abbas). The PLO was founded in 1964 (57 years ago) with the purpose of the "liberation of Palestine" through armed struggle.

Now what is interesting here is that the people that are fighting to maintain a regime are the Palestinians. Without regard to what the Palestinians say -- what they are doing is completely different. Chairman Abbas is now on the 10th year of his Presidency (if you subscribe to the theory that Abbas assumed power legitimately). But for all practical purposes, Abbas has been the dictator of the territory since his assumption of the PLO chairmanship (the last 17 years).

This strategy is very common among the mouthy Arab Palestinians. And they compound the mistake by trying to impress the audience by a show of numbers in the Palestinian Love Fest they call a "series" as if it were a program of some sort.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Huh? :confused-84:
 

This is Apartheid Webinar, 22 March 2021​




Ironically, what they describe as apartheid,
is the exact norm in every Arab society.

Let's examine-

is it apartheid to ban the Kuffiyeh,
or the term applies only against Jews?

 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top