Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
View attachment 192371
A better experiment would be to float 12 magnets on tiny sponges, like your video showed for one, in the leftmost row of this ice cube tray and while they're floating, freeze the water they're floating in.
Next, add new sponges, water and magnets in the next row, rotate the tray 180 degrees and put back in the freezer.
The original ones will stay frozen in place and the 2nd row will freeze with the opposite orientation.
Repeat a 3rd, 4th and 5th time, rotating the tray 180 degrees each time.
When you're done you'll have a pretty clear picture of what happens when the poles reverse.
Your thought experiment doesn't work. The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180. Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.
Your thought experiment doesn't work
It does. I'm very proud of it.
The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180.
Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis
I'm making an experiment to test my hypothesis. Mine is much better than the clown you linked.
instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.
Ummm....you don't fit your hypothesis to what happens, you compare what happens to your hypothesis.
Have you done the experiment? Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.
>>T: Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
<<
All the rows would point to magnetic N.
With that, I'll leave now ha ha.
Have you done the experiment?
No.
Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.
If I thought it would prove something new, maybe I'd do it, but it's already well known that the poles reverse.
And that the evidence can be seen on the sea floor.
All the rows would point to magnetic N.
Why do you feel that?
Do it with one row. Mark the end of the tray deepest in the freezer N. Mark the end closest the door S.
Magnets on sponges floating in water. Freeze it.
Take it out of the freezer. Add a new row. Put it back in the freezer.
This time, put the end marked S deepest and N closest the door. After it freezes, pull it out.
The painted ends of the magnets will be in the opposite orientation in the 2nd row than in the 1st row.
You first. Age before beauty.
Here's where you can buy K&J Magnetics: Disc/Cylinder Magnets *. Next time your friends come over you can show them your superb scientific knowledge.
(* Note: I'm not promoting anything, but learning real science. I want to do some of the magnet stuff, too).
Your thought experiment doesn't work. The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180. Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.
Your thought experiment doesn't work
It does. I'm very proud of it.
The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180.
Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis
I'm making an experiment to test my hypothesis. Mine is much better than the clown you linked.
instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.
Ummm....you don't fit your hypothesis to what happens, you compare what happens to your hypothesis.
Have you done the experiment? Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.
>>T: Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
<<
All the rows would point to magnetic N.
With that, I'll leave now ha ha.
Have you done the experiment?
No.
Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.
If I thought it would prove something new, maybe I'd do it, but it's already well known that the poles reverse.
And that the evidence can be seen on the sea floor.
All the rows would point to magnetic N.
Why do you feel that?
Do it with one row. Mark the end of the tray deepest in the freezer N. Mark the end closest the door S.
Magnets on sponges floating in water. Freeze it.
Take it out of the freezer. Add a new row. Put it back in the freezer.
This time, put the end marked S deepest and N closest the door. After it freezes, pull it out.
The painted ends of the magnets will be in the opposite orientation in the 2nd row than in the 1st row.
You first. Age before beauty
Here's where you can buy K&J Magnetics: Disc/Cylinder Magnets *. Next time your friends come over you can show them your superb scientific knowledge.
(* Note: I'm not promoting anything, but learning real science. I want to do some of the magnet stuff, too
Great, try my experiment.
Photograph the results.
Post it here.
This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).
and
"
Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.
The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.
What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.
I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.
The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.
Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.
Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
Humans will be long gone by then.
What's going to happen?
Scenario From a Je$u$ Salesman
The Rapture. So you better pay for the trip in advance by dropping a wad of dough at your local church, which is God's collection agency.
Your thought experiment doesn't work
It does. I'm very proud of it.
The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180.
Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis
I'm making an experiment to test my hypothesis. Mine is much better than the clown you linked.
instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.
Ummm....you don't fit your hypothesis to what happens, you compare what happens to your hypothesis.
Have you done the experiment? Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.
>>T: Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
<<
All the rows would point to magnetic N.
With that, I'll leave now ha ha.
Have you done the experiment?
No.
Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.
If I thought it would prove something new, maybe I'd do it, but it's already well known that the poles reverse.
And that the evidence can be seen on the sea floor.
All the rows would point to magnetic N.
Why do you feel that?
Do it with one row. Mark the end of the tray deepest in the freezer N. Mark the end closest the door S.
Magnets on sponges floating in water. Freeze it.
Take it out of the freezer. Add a new row. Put it back in the freezer.
This time, put the end marked S deepest and N closest the door. After it freezes, pull it out.
The painted ends of the magnets will be in the opposite orientation in the 2nd row than in the 1st row.
You first. Age before beauty
Here's where you can buy K&J Magnetics: Disc/Cylinder Magnets *. Next time your friends come over you can show them your superb scientific knowledge.
(* Note: I'm not promoting anything, but learning real science. I want to do some of the magnet stuff, too
Great, try my experiment.
Photograph the results.
Post it here.
Nah, I got my own irons in the fire. It's your experiment.
Besides, I already have got more than half of this figured out.
This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).
and"
Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.
The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.
What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.
I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.
The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.
Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.
Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
Humans will be long gone by then.
What's going to happen?
Scenario From a Je$u$ Salesman
The Rapture. So you better pay for the trip in advance by dropping a wad of dough at your local church, which is God's collection agency.
No, this isn't Rapture. It's too small for Rapture.
For a Fee, I'll Teach You to Whoosh
But Bible-Bangers can sell it as Rapture.
www.sciencealert.com
The earth’s magnetic field is wearing down so quickly that it could be no more than 20,000 years old."
answersingenesis.org
The magnetic field HAS to be way older than 20,000 yeears
This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).
and"
Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.
The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.
What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.
I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.
The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.
Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.
Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
Humans will be long gone by then.
The claim that the magnetic field is self-generating is wrong. Atheist scientists are usually wrong.
Otherwise, we wouldn't be sending expensive satellites up there to study the decay.
This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).
and"
Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.
The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.
What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.
I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.
The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.
Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.
Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
No. It doesn't mean that. When the core cools down, the magnetic field will cease to exist.I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo?
This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).
and"
Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.
The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.
What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.
I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.
The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.
Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.
Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).
and"
Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.
The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.
What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.
I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.
The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.
Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.
Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
