Persistence Of Memory
Diamond Member
- Oct 1, 2019
- 5,128
- 4,220
- 1,940
Yes. The one that said the bar was so low to begin it. Very flimsy to start an investigation. Especially this was planned to be made a fake crime.The one that said the surveillance of Carter Page was justified?Check the Horowitz report for further clarification.Still waiting for proof that actually happened.Do you think altering FBI docs to a FISA is a sham? Explain that thoroughly and I'm on board.Lol, it's a sham all right, but not for the reasons you think.I told you so, I never, not for one millisecond, believed this man(Barr)was gonna actually take after the traitors in the Obama administration, the federal bureaucracy, and "uhh" the US senate, and that last is why this was all a sham from day one, thats because almost every US senator was in on this coup d' tat from the outset, hell, the fucking republicans authored it, it was republicans who created Mueller! Checkmate America, you fucking lost, now shut the fuck up and do exactly as you are told to do by your masters in the aristocracy!
Durham, under pressure to wrap up investigation, could 'punt' to after Election Day: source
U.S. Attorney John Durham is under pressure to wrap up his investigation into the origins of the Russia probe by the end of the summer, but if he doesn’t, he could wait to reveal his findings or initiate prosecutions until after the 2020 presidential election, Fox News has learned.www.foxnews.com
Now it lead to FISA falsification so let's start again. Was it OK to alter docs to a FISA Court?