Dozens of people on FBI terrorist watch list came to D.C. the day of Capitol riot

[Flaylo]

Trump could have done away with this unconstitutional list. He did not.

It is constitutional, terrorists must be identified and watched

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.​

What due process of law is involved in being put on this list and deprived of the liberty to travel?

Those on the no fly list have already committed crimes or was an insurrectionist.

 

[bripat9643]

So because they're white you're saying they must be guilty first?

You just admitted that you don't believe people have to be convicted of a crime before the government can impose penalties on them.

You're a fucking NAZI. But we already knew that.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump could have done away with this unconstitutional list. He did not.

It is constitutional, terrorists must be identified and watched

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.​

What due process of law is involved in being put on this list and deprived of the liberty to travel?

Those on the no fly list have already committed crimes or was an insurrectionist.

Nope.

 

[bripat9643]

White supremacists are default terrorists so they need to be watched before they commit a crime, not after, that would be ass backwards

What's the criteria for being a "white supremacist" and added to the list?

Being white and being Republican.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

So because they're white you're saying they must be guilty first?

Anyone must be guilty of an actual crime, and proven to be so, before he can be punished for that crime.

You're the only one who is making it about race. The same is true regardless of the race of the one whom you want to deprive of life, liberty, or property.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Those on the no fly list have already committed crimes or was an insurrectionist.

What due process of law was involved in making that determination?

 

[MarcATL]

Even if that were true, which it isn't, how would that make it constitutional?

The government surveilling potential criminals is unconstitutional?

 

[Flaylo]

So if you're online talking about overthrowing the govt, subjugating minority groups, kidnapping members of congress, and talking about inevitable race wars that the FBI should do nothing and not put people on no fly lists and terrorist lists all because you think its just talk and nothing has happened yet? GTFOH, you guys are a bunch of pussies

 

[bripat9643]

So if you're online talking about overthrowing the govt, subjugating minority groups, kidnapping members of congress, and talking about inevitable race wars that the FBI should do nothing and not put people on no fly lists and terrorist lists all because you think its just talk and nothing has happened yet? GTFOH, you guys are a bunch of pussies

Two of those things are crimes, you dumbass NAZI.

 

[Flaylo]

So because they're white you're saying they must be guilty first?

Anyone must be guilty of an actual crime, and proven to be so, before he can be punished for that crime.

You're the only one who is making it about race. The same is true regardless of the race of the one whom you want to deprive of life, liberty, or property.

You do not have to be guilty of a crime in order to be surveilled by the govt especially when you speak about overthrowing the govt you dickhead, thats why it does not violate due process in the constitution, you pussies want to talk your talk to do whatever you want without being stopped and because you are white you somehow feel that it doesn't apply to you

 

[Flaylo]

So if you're online talking about overthrowing the govt, subjugating minority groups, kidnapping members of congress, and talking about inevitable race wars that the FBI should do nothing and not put people on no fly lists and terrorist lists all because you think its just talk and nothing has happened yet? GTFOH, you guys are a bunch of pussies

Two of those things are crimes, you dumbass NAZI.

That is what those idiots on the far right are doing and attempted to do on January 6th you fucking dickwad, they were already online being monitored

 

[Flaylo]

Dickwad, what do you think white supremacists talk about online? Violence, hate, ruling over others, and being armed to do it.

 

[bripat9643]

So because they're white you're saying they must be guilty first?

Anyone must be guilty of an actual crime, and proven to be so, before he can be punished for that crime.

You're the only one who is making it about race. The same is true regardless of the race of the one whom you want to deprive of life, liberty, or property.

You do not have to be guilty of a crime in order to be surveilled by the govt especially when you speak about overthrowing the govt you dickhead, thats why it does not violate due process in the constitution, you pussies want to talk your talk to do whatever you want without being stopped and because you are white you somehow feel that it doesn't apply to you

According to the Constitution, you do.

 

[bripat9643]

Dickwad, what do you think white supremacists talk about online? Violence, hate, ruling over others, and being armed to do it.

UNless they are planning an actual crime, none of that is illegal. Who talks more about ruling over others than the minions of the Democrat Reich?

 

[bripat9643]

So if you're online talking about overthrowing the govt, subjugating minority groups, kidnapping members of congress, and talking about inevitable race wars that the FBI should do nothing and not put people on no fly lists and terrorist lists all because you think its just talk and nothing has happened yet? GTFOH, you guys are a bunch of pussies

Two of those things are crimes, you dumbass NAZI.

That is what those idiots on the far right are doing and attempted to do on January 6th you fucking dickwad, they were already online being monitored

No they didn't, NAZI. You're blowing hot gas out your ass.

 

[Flaylo]

Dickwad, what do you think white supremacists talk about online? Violence, hate, ruling over others, and being armed to do it.

UNless they are planning an actual crime, none of that is illegal. Who talks more about ruling over others than the minions of the Democrat Reich?

It is not illegal for the govt to surveilled such people and place them on no fly lists.

 

[Flaylo]

So because they're white you're saying they must be guilty first?

Anyone must be guilty of an actual crime, and proven to be so, before he can be punished for that crime.

You're the only one who is making it about race. The same is true regardless of the race of the one whom you want to deprive of life, liberty, or property.

You do not have to be guilty of a crime in order to be surveilled by the govt especially when you speak about overthrowing the govt you dickhead, thats why it does not violate due process in the constitution, you pussies want to talk your talk to do whatever you want without being stopped and because you are white you somehow feel that it doesn't apply to you

According to the Constitution, you do.

According to the law you don't.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It is not illegal for the govt to surveilled such people and place them on no fly lists.

The Fourth and Fifth Amendments say otherwise.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

According to the Constitution, you do.

According to the law you don't.

The Constitution •IS• the law. It takes precedence over all lesser laws.