Donald Trump still more popular than Biden with American.

[Mustang]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

The politician Adolf Hitler is still more famous than the politician and narcissist Donald Trump. No need for him to become more famous. What about a re-education? He could try to become a much more famous mathematician as Euclid once had been and still is. This would be a real challenge for a real genius. Why to waste his time with politics? Trump has better things to do. To play gulf for example, ... mathematically exact.

Trump is history.

While he was president, he relished being the center of attention. He demanded center stage and made sure to make enough outrageous statements on an almost daily bases that the cameras were always focused on him. Now everything has changed. He's no longer the center of attention, regardless of how much he doesn't like it. He's never going to get that kind of attention again unless he runs for president in 2024.

Most Americans are grateful that he's no longer dominating the airwaves. In his place, we now have a president who's more concerned with doing the work than standing in front of cameras and pontificating.

You mean most brain damaged idiots are grateful. When you demonstrate the ability to read minds, perhaps someone will take your obvious horseshit seriously

Trump is history. Get used to it.

 

[beautress]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

The politician Adolf Hitler is still more famous than the politician and narcissist Donald Trump. No need for him to become more famous. What about a re-education? He could try to become a much more famous mathematician as Euclid once had been and still is. This would be a real challenge for a real genius. Why to waste his time with politics? Trump has better things to do. To play gulf for example, ... mathematically exact.

Trump is history.

While he was president, he relished being the center of attention. He demanded center stage and made sure to make enough outrageous statements on an almost daily bases that the cameras were always focused on him. Now everything has changed. He's no longer the center of attention, regardless of how much he doesn't like it. He's never going to get that kind of attention again unless he runs for president in 2024.

Most Americans are grateful that he's no longer dominating the airwaves. In his place, we now have a president who's more concerned with doing the work than standing in front of cameras and pontificating.

You mean most brain damaged idiots are grateful. When you demonstrate the ability to read minds, perhaps someone will take your obvious horseshit seriously

Trump is history. Get used to it.

Trump is past, present and future history of this prosperous and wonderful land. Lucky you! Even when you cannot show gratitude yet.

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

Failed attempt at humor. Quite dumb.

It wasn't meant to be funny.

Rather it was meant to point out the vanity of a large waisted, big assed man of 6'3 pretending to weigh 236lbs and in that effort wearing long winter jackets in the middle of summer to hide his plumpness. It was meant to remind everyone of how a combat dodging coward insulted a war hero who paid a big price in defense of this country, and how a chickenshit bully made humor of the handicapped. Last, I highlighted Trump's stupidity by recalling his utterly insane suggestion to inject Lysol.

There's nothing funny about any of those things. Instead, it's pathetic just as are the cockroaches who hide from what Trump is. They all run when you turn the lights on Trump.

Thanks for being my foil.

Haha......you're boring.

I can see your boredom by the effort that you put in your post. My kids use to like Chutes and Ladders when they were toddlers. Have you tried it?

Hey buddy, I'm going to throw you a bone here. Stop trying to be funny. Its tedious and boring.

Thanks for the laughs but we're off topic.
Have a nice life.

 

[BLUE COLLAR]

That President Trump is the most popular President of the century must be a severe blow to the greatly disdained and unelected unpresidential basement dweller of the deep state worshippers and the press that conned the dupes into cheating at the polls.

Good grief, it's not a football game.

 

[candycorn]

That President Trump is the most popular President of the century must be a severe blow to the greatly disdained and unelected unpresidential basement dweller of the deep state worshippers and the press that conned the dupes into cheating at the polls.

His inauguration crowd was lame. He lost by 8 million votes. Your opinions are stupid.

 

[candycorn]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.

306-232
Scoreboard.

Shameless.

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...

What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?

You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.

Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.

I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.

You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.

306-232. Scoreboard.

So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?

Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.

Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol

Huh?

You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.

I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.

No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?

Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.

Said "reporter" is nothing but a shithead progressive activist who was being disrespectful of the President...he should have had the microphone taken, hell, he should have been escorted from the building...

That's your opinion and it is, worthless of course.

That the press conference the blob had resulted in a reporter being wrestled with....just underscores the carnival atmosphere that perpetuated the blob's administration.

 

[candycorn]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.

306-232
Scoreboard.

Shameless.

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...

What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?

You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.

Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.

I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.

You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.

306-232. Scoreboard.

So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?

Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.

Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol

Huh?

You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.

I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.

No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?

Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.

Lol, Acosta? That shithead? They never silenced him, did they? Biden's handlers know he cannot take questions, because he is a demented fool and you're a fool thinking he isn't. Good day!

And you're thinking what...they should have "silenced him"? That's what you get when you're in a cult...you can't take any questioning of your orange blob-like God.

 

[jknowgood]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.

306-232
Scoreboard.

Shameless.

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...

What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?

You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.

Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.

I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.

You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.

306-232. Scoreboard.

So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?

Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.

Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol

Huh?

You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.

I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.

No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?

Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.

Said "reporter" is nothing but a shithead progressive activist who was being disrespectful of the President...he should have had the microphone taken, hell, he should have been escorted from the building...

That's your opinion and it is, worthless of course.

That the press conference the blob had resulted in a reporter being wrestled with....just underscores the carnival atmosphere that perpetuated the blob's administration.

He pushed that poor little girl back. He should've got his ass beat right then and there.

 

[jknowgood]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.

306-232
Scoreboard.

Shameless.

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...

What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?

You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.

Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.

I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.

You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.

306-232. Scoreboard.

So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?

Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.

Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol

Huh?

You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.

I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.

No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?

Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.

Lol, Acosta? That shithead? They never silenced him, did they? Biden's handlers know he cannot take questions, because he is a demented fool and you're a fool thinking he isn't. Good day!

And you're thinking what...they should have "silenced him"? That's what you get when you're in a cult...you can't take any questioning of your orange blob-like God.

Trump took questions, Biden says he will and they cut him off. I mean cut him off, by ending it. Lol. Ole illegitimate pedo demented Joe!

 

[PoliticalChic]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

The politician Adolf Hitler is still more famous than the politician and narcissist Donald Trump. No need for him to become more famous. What about a re-education? He could try to become a much more famous mathematician as Euclid once had been and still is. This would be a real challenge for a real genius. Why to waste his time with politics? Trump has better things to do. To play gulf for example, ... mathematically exact.

Trump is history.

While he was president, he relished being the center of attention. He demanded center stage and made sure to make enough outrageous statements on an almost daily bases that the cameras were always focused on him. Now everything has changed. He's no longer the center of attention, regardless of how much he doesn't like it. He's never going to get that kind of attention again unless he runs for president in 2024.

Most Americans are grateful that he's no longer dominating the airwaves. In his place, we now have a president who's more concerned with doing the work than standing in front of cameras and pontificating.

Thank you for sleepwalking through Trump's amazing speech at Cpac this week. And his history is one of winning the favor of every day American people who are determined to make America great again!

When you said 'amazing speech,' I had to remind of this one:

Remarks by President Trump at South Dakota’s 2020 Mount Rushmore Fireworks Celebration | Keystone, South Dakota

Issued on: July 4, 2020

Issued on: July 4, 2020​

1.Today, we pay tribute to the exceptional lives and extraordinary legacies of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt. (Applause.) I am here as your President to proclaim before the country and before the world: This monument will never be desecrated — (applause) — these heroes will never be defaced, their legacy will never, ever be destroyed, their achievements will never be forgotten, and Mount Rushmore will stand forever as an eternal tribute to our forefathers and to our freedom.

2. We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations: July 4th, 1776. At those words, every American heart should swell with pride. Every American family should cheer with delight. And every American patriot should be filled with joy, because each of you lives in the most magnificent country in the history of the world, and it will soon be greater than ever before.

3. These immortal words set in motion the unstoppable march of freedom. Our Founders boldly declared that we are all endowed with the same divine rights — given [to] us by our Creator in Heaven. And that which God has given us, we will allow no one, ever, to take away — ever.

4. Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children. Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our Founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities. Many of these people have no idea why they are doing this, but some know exactly what they are doing. They think the American people are weak and soft and submissive. But no, the American people are strong and proud, and they will not allow our country, and all of its values, history, and culture, to be taken from them.

5. One of their political weapons is “Cancel Culture” — driving people from their jobs, shaming dissenters, and demanding total submission from anyone who disagrees. This is the very definition of totalitarianism, and it is completely alien to our culture and our values, and it has absolutely no place in the United States of America. This attack on our liberty, our magnificent liberty, must be stopped, and it will be stopped very quickly. We will expose this dangerous movement, protect our nation’s children, end this radical assault, and preserve our beloved American way of life.

6. In our schools, our newsrooms, even our corporate boardrooms, there is a new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance. If you do not speak its language, perform its rituals, recite its mantras, and follow its commandments, then you will be censored, banished, blacklisted, persecuted, and punished. It’s not going to happen to us. Make no mistake: this left-wing cultural revolution is designed to overthrow the American Revolution. In so doing, they would destroy the very civilization that rescued billions from poverty, disease, violence, and hunger, and that lifted humanity to new heights of achievement, discovery, and progress…. they are determined to tear down every statue, symbol, and memory of our national heritage. Above all, our children, from every community, must be taught that to be American is to inherit the spirit of the most adventurous and confident people ever to walk the face of the Earth.



7. The violent mayhem we have seen in the streets of cities that are run by liberal Democrats, in every case, is the predictable result of years of extreme indoctrination and bias in education, journalism, and other cultural institutions. Against every law of society and nature, our children are taught in school to hate their own country, and to believe that the men and women who built it were not heroes, but that were villains. The radical view of American history is a web of lies — all perspective is removed, every virtue is obscured, every motive is twisted, every fact is distorted, and every flaw is magnified until the history is purged and the record is disfigured beyond all recognition.

8. We are proud of the fact— that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and we understand —— that these values have dramatically advanced the cause of peace and justice throughout the world.

We know that the American family is the bedrock of American life.

We recognize the solemn right and moral duty of every nation to secure its borders. And we are building the wall.

We remember that governments exist to protect the safety and happiness of their own people. A nation must care for its own citizens first. We must take care of America first. It’s time.

We believe in equal opportunity, equal justice, and equal treatment for citizens of every race, background, religion, and creed. Every child, of every color — born and unborn — is made in the holy image of God. We want free and open debate, not speech codes and cancel culture.

We embrace tolerance, not prejudice.

We support the courageous men and women of law enforcement. We will never abolish our police or our great Second Amendment, which gives us the right to keep and bear arms.

We believe that our children should be taught to love their country, honor our history, and respect our great American flag.

We stand tall, we stand proud, and we only kneel to Almighty God.

This is who we are. This is what we believe.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...-fireworks-celebration-keystone-south-dakota/

 

[bripat9643]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.

306-232
Scoreboard.

Shameless.

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...

What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?

You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.

Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.

I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.

You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.

306-232. Scoreboard.

So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?

Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.

Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol

Huh?

You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.

I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.

No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?

Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.

Said "reporter" is nothing but a shithead progressive activist who was being disrespectful of the President...he should have had the microphone taken, hell, he should have been escorted from the building...

That's your opinion and it is, worthless of course.

That the press conference the blob had resulted in a reporter being wrestled with....just underscores the carnival atmosphere that perpetuated the blob's administration.

Making Trump into the bad guy over that incident only shows what a sleazy lying NAZI thug you are. Jim Acosta was literly breaking the law when he refused to return Trump's micorphone, and you endorse this kind of behavior? Security people should have tackled him, wrestled him to the ground, dragged him out of the building, and then had him arrested.

 

[j-mac]

That's your opinion and it is, worthless of course.

Really....This is why I love video of the event in question....In case you've romanticized it in your mind, let's review the event in question shall we?



You'll notice at about 1:30, the young intern is trying to get the mic, as the President was done with Acosta, and his wanting to be an activist instead of a journalist. Acosta fended her off by using his left arm to push her away, instead of respectfully relinquishing the mic, as another reporter that had been called on was standing and waiting for said mic....

So, while you love that kind of disrespect of a President you don't like, if a FNC reporter were to act that way with Biden at present you'd be screaming how rude and unfair the FNC reporter is....And worse....

That the press conference the blob had resulted in a reporter being wrestled with....just underscores the carnival atmosphere that perpetuated the blob's administration.

The carnival atmosphere as you term it, was caused by a supposed reporter, Jim Acosta, trying to be the story, instead of being a reporter....But, I understand that in a world now where progressives like yourself embrace Saul Alinsky tactics openly, and without shame, the rest of us have common sense....

So, now you can on and on, about how I am to be denegrated by you, and insulted instead of moving on and discussing the actual subject, or I can just move on....Your choice.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

No pressers, no SOTU, no questions, no exposure.... and dozens of EO's that help everyone, except Americans.

The stuttering fuck's weak cowardice is the laughingstock of the planet.

View attachment 463575

Which proves the trolls on this site that voted for this piece of shit are commie loving paid shills that hate america.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

The Vegetable can't even read from a teleprompter for 20 seconds without forgetting where he is.

306-232
Scoreboard.

Shameless.

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

BDS!

How can you have bds with a shell of a moron? Biden is a demented fool.

More pure BDS!

View attachment 463622

Erasing the blob's legacy one uneventful day at a time.

Persons being vaccinated is way ahead of schedule thanks to Joe...the relief bill is progressing through Congress nicely, we're once again joining our allies instead of picking fights with them...and you blob is relegated to the back pages of the news.

Joe is doing a great job.

People were being vaccinated more quickly under Trump.

Factually incorrect.

Biden on his first day got Canada wanting to put sanctions on us.

Try again slingblade. LOL

Biden is a laughing stock. He cannot even hold a press conference.

Meanwhile back in reality; he did a town hall that was televised, took questions, etc...

What, did they ask him if he got his pudding pop yet?

You sound like you need a nap...you keep making these silly accusations then when they are proven wrong, you say something ignorant.

Poor illegitimate dementia pedo Joe.

I guess you're tired of getting creamed on the topic you tried to introduce. I can't blame you. Your ass has been kicked so often, you now have to shit via your mouth.

You couldn't kick yourself out of a wet paper bag. Joe is demented and is proving to be worse than Obama. Even leaders in your own party wants to take the nuclear codes from him.

306-232. Scoreboard.

So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?

Wow this is out of left field and further derails your thread. I see you're changing the subject yet again....I guess you're finally learning your lesson. You've been taught enough of them. LOL.

But lets go there!

As with almost all things, there are nuances to this.

Your question is: "So you're good with leaders of your party wanting your guy Biden stripped from the nuclear codes?".

A). That isn't what the letter said at all. The President would have the sole authority to instigate a launch.
B). What the letter did say was that those who signed off on it wanted to strip the President from being able to unilaterally launch nuclear weapons. The decision to launch would still be her or his...he can't be over-ruled. But his decision would have to be seconded by someone. As I recall, the letter presented four options.

View attachment 463943

View attachment 463944

As far as the options presented above, for a first strike ONLY, #1 and #3 are the ones I'd endorse. Number two is nonsense. As we saw with your blob, we often had "acting" secretaries of defense, state, treasury, CIA, etc... The only federal official he didn't fire was the guy who changes the lightbulbs in the guard shack. So #2 is not a workable solution; a blob-like President would just keep firing anyone who disagreed with him and replace them with someone who would agree to fire the nukes. #4 would be okay but it would depend on who sits on the council. But if you're going to empanel a council; why not go with #3 and get Congress to declare war before we launch weapons? Also, you have to worry about the talent of the people in those positions.

Again, all of that is nuanced commentary regarding a first-strike. To answer you question, I'm elated by it. No President should be able to guarantee the end of the world. I think a similar letter should be sent regarding the presidential pardon as well--stripping the office of the power to pardon. Put it in the hands of a 3 judge panel. We need the pardon; Presidents from both major parties have turned it into a reward for patronage instead of an eraser.

If the question is to put limits on the President in terms of a retaliating, I'm less in favor of that but at the end of the day, I'm okay with her/him keeping the power to unilaterally launching our nukes. The letter is not clear if they are talking about launching in all cases or just first strikes. So again, Yes to stripping the power of a first strike and No to stripping the power of a retaliation.

The reasons I'm not super excited about it is because of two considerations

The idea that we have to launch immediately is pretty silly. We have 18 Ohio Class Subs--one or two under the ice cap at any time--that can rain nukes down on much of the earth. The idea that the ICBMs that are incoming will take away our launch capability is false. On top of the subs, SAC has dozens of B52's, B-1, and B-2s that can carry nuke payloads. If we can get them airborne fast enough is a question but we train to launch them pretty quickly. I get the reason people would want to launch immediately but the NEED to do so is non-existent.

Also, the cartoonish version that we've been fed of a giant screen at NORAD tracking incoming ICBMs is likely not the way it's going to work. Any nation rich enough to have a nuke arsenal is sophisticated enough to know that they will be reduced to nothing in short order if they launch. So state actors are most likely off the list of suspects who are going to start a nuke war.

As far as the nukes themselves go....Here is how we will be hit one day:

1. Terrorists/Rogue commanders take over a nuke site somewhere and launch. Unlikely but more likely than an elected head of state pushing the button
2. Terrorists/Rogue commanders acquire a nuke and a launcher and take out an ally of ours. Do we respond if ISIS takes out Milan? Interesting question. Again, this is unlikely but more likely than a head of state pushing the button.
3. This is the most likely scenario...the nuke in one of the bajillion containers we offload daily at our ports. It goes off in Houston or Jacksonville or Miami. What then? It's unknown where the container came from--investigating it would rather difficult. If it's a terrorist who is now in, lets say, Cairo...do we nuke Cairo to "get even" with the leader of the group?

All in all, the nukes we have are a useless weapon. Even if we did decide that we are going to "get even" with the dude in Cairo and spin up the USS Georgia to launch it's arsenal....when Russia and China see it on their defense screens picked up by their satellites...what do they do? Are they going to wait until the missiles land before they launch their birds? I doubt it. Our retaliation would likely mean complete destruction.

Yes Democrats tried it on republican presidents, but no Democrat. Why was Biden cut off as soon as he said he would take questions. That has never happened before. Lol

Huh?

You boy cannot take a question unless he already knows what it is. He is demented.

I guess at at some point he will have someone wrestle a microphone away from a reporter like your blob did. LOL.

306-232. Scoreboard.

No wrestling, just cut him off. No President in history has been treated this way. Why?

Your blob ordered one of his toadies to take the microphone away from a reporter in a press conference. And you worship him.

Said "reporter" is nothing but a shithead progressive activist who was being disrespectful of the President...he should have had the microphone taken, hell, he should have been escorted from the building...

That's your opinion and it is, worthless of course.

That the press conference the blob had resulted in a reporter being wrestled with....just underscores the carnival atmosphere that perpetuated the blob's administration.

Making Trump into the bad guy over that incident only shows what a sleazy lying NAZI thug you are. Jim Acosta was literly breaking the law when he refused to return Trump's micorphone, and you endorse this kind of behavior? Security people should have tackled him, wrestled him to the ground, dragged him out of the building, and then had him arrested.

what do you expect from candayass,this shill is a resident from langley who gets paid by his handlers to post lies night and day 24/7 and he indeed does post on boards 24/7 with lies the fact he goes to several other message boards as well besides this one and trolls.

the proof is in the pudding that Trump was the first president in decades that served the people instead of the elite the fact that Langley shills like candyass and wrongwinger always kissed the asses of globalists warmongers bush and obama but crucify trump all the time.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

the american hating trump shills can only sling shit in defeat likethe monkey trolls they are.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

After over a month Biden's inauguration only has 16k likes and 90K dislikes?

View attachment 463555

the american hating trump shills can only sling shit in defeat likethe monkey trolls they are.

This fact here I see triggered the kid newbie troll I see who has no business being on a political forum.lol