Dominion….Or Doubtful?

LOL...

The results from the election were mixed which is about what you'd expect from a nation that is divided. If one side or another got a massive amount of votes and won swing stats by 10-20 percent, something would indeed be screwy.

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

If you can rig a machine/program to do one thing, then you can rig it to do only one thing and it doesn't have to change all the votes on a ballot.
Why fight it ... Why don't you want them to review the source code?

Eliminate the possibilities, accept no excuses.

.
More hot air from you...

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

Care to actually address the evidence? Why would the Democrats not rig the machines to give them two seats in Georgia?

Dominion voting machines do not report the absolute number or sorting of the ballots as cast.......instead, it allows "adjustments" to the numbers of votes cast.



In the contracts that Dominion signs with municipalities, we find the following:

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC. This Agreement is entered into between the County of Santa Clara (“County”) and Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (“Contractor” or “Dominion”) (collectively, the “Parties”).

Section 2.26 "Allows staff to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images."

https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov/Documents/CW2232168 Dominion Final.pdf
 
More hot air from you...

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

Care to actually address the evidence? Why would the Democrats not rig the machines to give them two seats in Georgia?


I just did explain how it could be done, and you ignored it and said hot air.
You don't have any evidence the source code isn't corrupt, because the machines don't use open source code.
You saying it didn't happen when there s no way you could know, isn't the right answer.

I understand, you're not going to agree, you don't have what it takes to want to look.
You really don't have to tell me again, which I am sure you will ignore, like everything else.

.

And you have no evidence that it is corrupt.

We do have the results though. Biden won but somehow alot of other democrats lost. Logic would dictate that if democrats and/or Biden supporters were rigging the machines, it would have delivered Democratic lawmakers as part of the rigging. I mean...its already a felony if they're caught rigging it for Joe...why not just rig all of the statewide races too?
 
LOL...

The results from the election were mixed which is about what you'd expect from a nation that is divided. If one side or another got a massive amount of votes and won swing stats by 10-20 percent, something would indeed be screwy.

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

If you can rig a machine/program to do one thing, then you can rig it to do only one thing and it doesn't have to change all the votes on a ballot.
Why fight it ... Why don't you want them to review the source code?

Eliminate the possibilities, accept no excuses.

.



The scam was aimed at one thing and one thing only: elect Biden.





1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.



Imagine two hypothetical voters..



Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.



Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesn’t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. It’s quantity, not quality.







2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.







3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden marked…..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?

Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.











4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/11/05/why-does-biden-have-so-many-more-votes-than-democrat-senators-in-swing-states/
 
LOL...

The results from the election were mixed which is about what you'd expect from a nation that is divided. If one side or another got a massive amount of votes and won swing stats by 10-20 percent, something would indeed be screwy.

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

If you can rig a machine/program to do one thing, then you can rig it to do only one thing and it doesn't have to change all the votes on a ballot.
Why fight it ... Why don't you want them to review the source code?

Eliminate the possibilities, accept no excuses.

.



The scam was aimed at one thing and one thing only: elect Biden.





1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.



Imagine two hypothetical voters..



Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.



Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesn’t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. It’s quantity, not quality.







2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.







3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden marked…..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?

Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.











4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/11/05/why-does-biden-have-so-many-more-votes-than-democrat-senators-in-swing-states/

One of your dumber posts. And for you Jumbo, that is saying quite a bit.

The master plotters who were already facing a felony charge for rigging the machines decided, "We shouldn't rig them for the Senate while we're at it."

Your reasoning is batshit crazy.
 
And you have no evidence that it is corrupt.

We do have the results though. Biden won but somehow alot of other democrats lost. Logic would dictate that if democrats and/or Biden supporters were rigging the machines, it would have delivered Democratic lawmakers as part of the rigging. I mean...its already a felony if they're caught rigging it for Joe...why not just rig all of the statewide races too?

Don't ask a question if you just want to make an excuse not to look for the answer.

The first thing we would do in circumstances where we were asked to come look at a system, was gauge the degree of buy-in by the senior management.
We did that because if they weren't willing to act on what we may need to look at, then there was no reason for them to waste their money and our time.

I get it ... You don't understand that.
You don't understand why people don't trust you, and you aren't willing to address it.

.
 
Last edited:
And you have no evidence that it is corrupt.

We do have the results though. Biden won but somehow alot of other democrats lost. Logic would dictate that if democrats and/or Biden supporters were rigging the machines, it would have delivered Democratic lawmakers as part of the rigging. I mean...its already a felony if they're caught rigging it for Joe...why not just rig all of the statewide races too?

Don't ask a question if you just want to make an excuse not to look for the answer.

The first thing we would do in circumstances where we were asked to come look at a system, was gage the degree of buy-in by the senior management.
We did that because if they weren't willing to act on what we may need to look at, then there was no reason for them to waste their money and our time.

I get it ... You don't understand that.
You don't understand why people don't trust you, and you aren't willing to address it.

.
Bottom line:

Nobody can explain why those who allegedly rigged the voting machines in Georgia did not also rig the two races for the US Senate. It fails the logic test.
 
LOL...

The results from the election were mixed which is about what you'd expect from a nation that is divided. If one side or another got a massive amount of votes and won swing stats by 10-20 percent, something would indeed be screwy.

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

If you can rig a machine/program to do one thing, then you can rig it to do only one thing and it doesn't have to change all the votes on a ballot.
Why fight it ... Why don't you want them to review the source code?

Eliminate the possibilities, accept no excuses.

.



The scam was aimed at one thing and one thing only: elect Biden.





1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.



Imagine two hypothetical voters..



Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.



Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesn’t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. It’s quantity, not quality.







2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.







3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden marked…..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?

Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.











4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/11/05/why-does-biden-have-so-many-more-votes-than-democrat-senators-in-swing-states/

I don't ... That's a theory and we won't know until we look.
That's about the only thing I can say.

.
 
LOL...

The results from the election were mixed which is about what you'd expect from a nation that is divided. If one side or another got a massive amount of votes and won swing stats by 10-20 percent, something would indeed be screwy.

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

If you can rig a machine/program to do one thing, then you can rig it to do only one thing and it doesn't have to change all the votes on a ballot.
Why fight it ... Why don't you want them to review the source code?

Eliminate the possibilities, accept no excuses.

.



The scam was aimed at one thing and one thing only: elect Biden.





1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.



Imagine two hypothetical voters..



Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.



Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesn’t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. It’s quantity, not quality.







2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.







3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden marked…..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?

Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.











4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/11/05/why-does-biden-have-so-many-more-votes-than-democrat-senators-in-swing-states/

One of your dumber posts. And for you Jumbo, that is saying quite a bit.

The master plotters who were already facing a felony charge for rigging the machines decided, "We shouldn't rig them for the Senate while we're at it."

Your reasoning is batshit crazy.



Easy peasy, lemon squeezy




1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.



Imagine two hypothetical voters..



Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.



Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesn’t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. It’s quantity, not quality.







2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.







3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden marked…..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?

Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.











4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”



Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.



In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” https://www.theburningplatform.com/2020/11/05/why-does-biden-have-so-many-more-votes-than-democrat-senators-in-swing-states/
 
LOL...

The results from the election were mixed which is about what you'd expect from a nation that is divided. If one side or another got a massive amount of votes and won swing stats by 10-20 percent, something would indeed be screwy.

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

If you can rig a machine/program to do one thing, then you can rig it to do only one thing and it doesn't have to change all the votes on a ballot.
Why fight it ... Why don't you want them to review the source code?

Eliminate the possibilities, accept no excuses.

.
More hot air from you...

But nobody can explain why the machines in Georgia returned one result for Biden (because they were rigged) and didn't return a result for the two DNC Senate candidates from the same state.

Care to actually address the evidence? Why would the Democrats not rig the machines to give them two seats in Georgia?

Dominion voting machines do not report the absolute number or sorting of the ballots as cast.......instead, it allows "adjustments" to the numbers of votes cast.



In the contracts that Dominion signs with municipalities, we find the following:

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC. This Agreement is entered into between the County of Santa Clara (“County”) and Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (“Contractor” or “Dominion”) (collectively, the “Parties”).

Section 2.26 "Allows staff to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images."

https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov/Documents/CW2232168 Dominion Final.pdf
dominion-blast.jpg
 
"Dominion Advisor Met With John Podesta Offering ‘Anything’ That Would Help Defeat Trump, According to Email Released by WikiLeaks
An email previously released by WikiLeaks reveals that a Dominion Voting advisor met with John Podesta during Hillary Clinton’s campaign to discuss ways that they could help to defeat Donald Trump.
In 2018, Dominion Voting announced that it had been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital, a New York-based private equity firm, who was being advised by Kirkland & Ellis LLP.


During Clinton’s campaign, according to an email chain released by WikiLeaks, Kirkland & Ellis LLP partner Kamran S. Bajwa met with John Podesta while offering “anything” to help defeat Donald Trump.

Podesta, at the time, was chair of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 U.S. presidential campaign.

"...I want to do whatever I can by way of sharing ideas, raising funds, recruiting campaign volunteers, and anything else that can help with your campaign."



The pieces are all falling into place.....

....but,, actually, it was hardly much of a puzzle in the first place.


Everyone, the lies notwithstanding, knows what happened.
 
"Dominion Advisor Met With John Podesta Offering ‘Anything’ That Would Help Defeat Trump, According to Email Released by WikiLeaks
An email previously released by WikiLeaks reveals that a Dominion Voting advisor met with John Podesta during Hillary Clinton’s campaign to discuss ways that they could help to defeat Donald Trump.
In 2018, Dominion Voting announced that it had been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital, a New York-based private equity firm, who was being advised by Kirkland & Ellis LLP.


During Clinton’s campaign, according to an email chain released by WikiLeaks, Kirkland & Ellis LLP partner Kamran S. Bajwa met with John Podesta while offering “anything” to help defeat Donald Trump.

Podesta, at the time, was chair of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 U.S. presidential campaign.

"...I want to do whatever I can by way of sharing ideas, raising funds, recruiting campaign volunteers, and anything else that can help with your campaign."



The pieces are all falling into place.....

....but,, actually, it was hardly much of a puzzle in the first place.


Everyone, the lies notwithstanding, knows what happened.
How sweet of Dominion. This will be like a little note to the Supreme Court when arguments in court are made...P.S. We want Trump dead. Signed...Dominion Vote Changing Company.
 
Last edited:
"Dominion Advisor Met With John Podesta Offering ‘Anything’ That Would Help Defeat Trump, According to Email Released by WikiLeaks
An email previously released by WikiLeaks reveals that a Dominion Voting advisor met with John Podesta during Hillary Clinton’s campaign to discuss ways that they could help to defeat Donald Trump.
In 2018, Dominion Voting announced that it had been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital, a New York-based private equity firm, who was being advised by Kirkland & Ellis LLP.


During Clinton’s campaign, according to an email chain released by WikiLeaks, Kirkland & Ellis LLP partner Kamran S. Bajwa met with John Podesta while offering “anything” to help defeat Donald Trump.

Podesta, at the time, was chair of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 U.S. presidential campaign.

"...I want to do whatever I can by way of sharing ideas, raising funds, recruiting campaign volunteers, and anything else that can help with your campaign."



The pieces are all falling into place.....

....but,, actually, it was hardly much of a puzzle in the first place.


Everyone, the lies notwithstanding, knows what happened.
How sweet of Dominion. This will be like a little note to the Supreme Court when arguments in court are made...P.S. We want Trump dead. Signed...Dominion Vote Changing Company.


Actually, even if there was that exact note, I don't believe they could find a constitutional basis to overturn the election.

They have planned this for a long time, perhaps as much as three generations, and the other side has been asleep at the switch.


"Shockingly since 1988 the CPUSA has stopped running their own candidates and have 100% of the time nominated the Democrat candidates as their candidates. So we have to take this question seriously.
Now the burden of proof is to disprove that the Democratic Party is really the Communist Party, to disprove it has the same policies as the CPUSA. How could we disprove that?

Have the Communists/Marxists/Socialists ever admitted that Democrats are a front group for them, that the Democrats have adopted their policies so there is no need to run their own candidates? Actually multiple Marxist Parties have.

Norman Thomas, the six-time Socialist Party candidate for U.S. President, said the following in a 1944 speech:

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened…. I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.”
 
What an excellent point.


Because of the huge number of errors and falsifications, the usual rate is closer to 20% of mail-in ballots.


Over 80,000 mail-in ballots disqualified in NYC primary mess
New York District Could Throw Out 1 in 5 Mail Ballots
theintercept.com › 2020/07/16 › new-york-mail-in-ball...



Jul 16, 2020 - New York Could Throw Out 1 in 5 Mail-in Ballots in One District, ... 20 percent of mail-in ballots will be thrown out for a variety of reasons.

Tens of thousands of mail ballots have been tossed out in this ...
www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2020/07/16




Jul 16, 2020 - Why ballots get thrown out. King County election workers sort vote-by-mail ballots for Washington state's presidential primary on March 10.

Fact check: Paterson election plagued with election fraud ...
thefulcrum.us › fact-check › paterson-election-fraud





Jul 2, 2020 - Phil Murphy ordered be completed exclusively by mail-in voting due to ... Jersey election officials threw out nearly 20 percent of mail-in ballots.

You visited this page on 8/2/20.

Swaths of Absentee Ballots Invalidated in Some Parts of NYC
www.ny1.com › all-boroughs › politics › 2020/07/15





Jul 14, 2020 - Absentee ballots for the June primary are preliminary invalidated at ... Over 20 Percent of Absentee Ballots Are Being Invalidated in Some Parts of NYC ... they had no control, should not stop those votes from being counted.” ...
Mail Voting Gone Wrong—Again - WSJ
www.wsj.com › Opinion › Review & Outlook
“During the 2020 election, Starbucks ran ads encouraging Americans to vote by mail. Now, Starbucks is trying to suspend mail-in ballots in their nationwide union elections due to alleged misconduct in the voting process. You can’t make it up!” —Michael Seifert
 
“During the 2020 election, Starbucks ran ads encouraging Americans to vote by mail. Now, Starbucks is trying to suspend mail-in ballots in their nationwide union elections due to alleged misconduct in the voting process. You can’t make it up!” —Michael Seifert
It’s poor form to bump yourself. Lacking attention?
 
It’s poor form to bump yourself. Lacking attention?


I'm a servant of the truth and will continue to provide it.


After all, I I didn't do so,imagine how much dumber you'd be.

After my receny schooling of you, you no longer claim that the Constitution isn't the law of the land,

You haven't thanked me yet.



“No. The constitution isn’t the law of the land”
https://www.usmessageboard.com/thre...the-2020-election.979140/page-6#post-29978112 post 108



Nor have you thanked ne for proving that there is no racism, contrary to your baseless claims.



Learn some manners.
 
“During the 2020 election, Starbucks ran ads encouraging Americans to vote by mail. Now, Starbucks is trying to suspend mail-in ballots in their nationwide union elections due to alleged misconduct in the voting process. You can’t make it up!” —Michael Seifert

It is SOP for the progressive mind.
 

Forum List

Back
Top