DOJ Admits Federal Government Ran Informants Inside the Oath Keepers on Jan. 6 & they could be called to testify under 6th Amendment

[basquebromance]

DOJ Drops the Bomb! The federal government admitted on January 6 that it ran informants inside the Oath Guard – less than a week before the trials spring on J6 prosecutors.

EXCLUSIVE: DOJ DROPS A BOMB! Admits Federal Government Ran Informants Inside the Oath Keepers on Jan. 6 - Spring This On J6 Attorneys Less than One Week Before Trials | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Oath Keepers member and Stewart Rhodes, the founder and president of the Oath Keepers Next week, the United States government is holding the trials of several Oath Keepers members who attended the protests in Washington DC on January 5th and January 6th.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Billy_Bob]

This is a turd, not a bomb... We knew they were there, and they were the instigators and agitators. This is not going to end well for these idiots... Bring on Ray Epps... I want to see him under oath and cross-examined.

 

[occupied]

The government has been infiltrating anti-government groups forever. So what?

 

[Billy_Bob]

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/doj-drops-a-bomb-admits-federal-government-ran-informants-inside-the-oath-keepers-on-jan-6-spring-this-on-j6-attorneys-less-than-one-week-before-t.994349/post-30492780

 

[basquebromance]

yea that thread is in The Rubber Room

 

[Billy_Bob]

yea that thread is in The Rubber Room

Just as this one should be... Its a joke

 

[Correll]

The government has been infiltrating anti-government groups forever. So what?

If they had people inside, why did they not warn of the supposedly planned "innsurrection"?

 

[Billy_Bob]

If they had people inside, why did they not warn of the supposedly planned "innsurrection"?

Worse still, why didn't Pelosi take appropriate securities posture? IF they had this information, it should have never happened. This was a set up. A false flag event to drive their political agenda.

 

[BULLDOG]

I would be disapponted if they hadn't infiltrated that insurrectionist group.

 

[Correll]

Worse still, why didn't Pelosi take appropriate securities posture? IF they had this information, it should have never happened. This was a set up. A false flag event to drive their political agenda.

The possibility that the "informants" were involved or leading the "insurrection" is certainly one of the big questions to be asked.

 

[Correll]

I would be disapponted if they hadn't infiltrated that insurrectionist group.

If they knew of the "insurrection" why did they sit on the information?

 

[BULLDOG]

If they knew of the "insurrection" why did they sit on the information?

Perhaps they misjudged how bad it would get, but there is no reason to believe they "sat on" the information.

 

[occupied]

If they had people inside, why did they not warn of the supposedly planned "innsurrection"?

It's clear no one thought the Trumpbots would go that far. Don't worry. No one is naive about right's intentions anymore.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Worse still, why didn't Pelosi take appropriate securities posture? IF they had this information, it should have never happened. This was a set up. A false flag event to drive their political agenda.

America now keeps American citizens as political prisoners.

45 days.

Then reckoning.

 

[Correll]

Perhaps they misjudged how bad it would get, but there is no reason to believe they "sat on" the information.

Really? The claim made by people like you, all the time, is that it was a planned insurrection, with leadership from above. .


How would they know that and not think it would be bad?


Are you changing your story on the 1/6 riot?

 

[Correll]

It's clear no one thought the Trumpbots would go that far. Don't worry. No one is naive about right's intentions anymore.

Mmm, so your position is that there was no plan of an insurrection? That's cool. A big change from the panic mongering we have been hearing since then.

 

[Oldestyle]

The government has been infiltrating anti-government groups forever. So what?

Were you paying attention to the Michigan "kidnapping" trial, Occupied? You can infiltrate anti-government groups but you can't entice them into breaking the law. If the FBI was enticing those militia members in Michigan to kidnap Governor Whitmer is it really a stretch to imagine them doing the same thing with protesters at the Jan 6th protests?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Were you paying attention to the Michigan "kidnapping" trial, Occupied? You can infiltrate anti-government groups but you can't entice them into breaking the law. If the FBI was enticing those militia members in Michigan to kidnap Governor Whitmer is it really a stretch to imagine them doing the same thing with protesters at the Jan 6th protests?

Almost a guarantee that your great post will fly right over the head of that poster you're speaking to.

 

[occupied]

Mmm, so your position is that there was no plan of an insurrection? That's cool. A big change from the panic mongering we have been hearing since then.

Oh there was a plan. It's mostly come out since then. I think people just got so used to laughing off all the insurrection/coup talk by the right that no one took it seriously enough. Don't worry. it's being taken very seriously now. You wanted to be taken seriously didn't you?

 

[hadit]

Perhaps they misjudged how bad it would get, but there is no reason to believe they "sat on" the information.

SMH at your obtuseness.

Reason one, 1/6 happened. If they had the info, they sat on it. If they didn't sit on it but passed it up the chain, someone DELIBERATELY refused to act, and that person is responsible for the death of the protestor. Name that person.