What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

DOJ Admits Federal Government Ran Informants Inside the Oath Keepers on Jan. 6 & they could be called to testify under 6th Amendment

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
102,649
Reaction score
26,669
Points
2,210
My point went completely over your head. According to Democrat hysteria there were armed Trumpsters at the Capital. None of them were shot.

If the FBI is going to plant agitators in among peaceful protesters to turn the peaceful protest into a riot and then Capital Police are going to shoot them to death as long as they are unarmed, then non Democrats have two options.

We can be bullied out of our right to protest for fear that Government agitators will foment a riot to justify our killing by law enforcement or we can the right to protest as our Constitution safeguards while bearing arms to make sure it stays peaceful.

You sound insane. There were no known government agitators at the Capitol on Sedition Day.
 

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Messages
6,042
Reaction score
4,512
Points
1,938
Location
Texas
You sound insane. There were no known government agitators at the Capitol on Sedition Day.
Yes, they keep them a secret, so or course they are not "known."

We have to use our logic and reasoning to understand that if there were no DOJ/FBI agents or informants agitating protesters on January 6th, the DOJ/FBI would rather huffily deny that they would ever do such a thing. They wouldn't say "Uh . . . uh . . . this is an ongoing blah blah blah"

You ever see a guy look shadier than this that answering a question?

1:43


Now, this senior official just wasn't aware of anything. That's the kind of "witness" the FBI likes to send to appear before these committees - those who don't know anything.


They also like witnesses who will simply refuse to answer questions such as:

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participate in the events of January 6th?

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th?

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively encourage or incite acts of violence on January 6th?


Now, maybe you don't want to know the answer to those questions. Maybe if it was to make Trump look bad, you are fine with FBI agents or confidential informants being paid to turn a peaceful protest into a deadly riot. If so, be honest and say that you are.

I believe the American people have a right and a need to know if their tax dollars are being spent for that.

Interestingly, Wray was quick to defend ANTIFA as not being a part of it, in spite that "ongoing investigation," cannard But he was eager to say that ANTIFA wasn't there. Case CLOSED! Likely with no investigation at all to remain "ongoing."

 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
84,482
Reaction score
22,176
Points
2,180
Yes, they keep them a secret, so or course they are not "known."

We have to use our logic and reasoning to understand that if there were no DOJ/FBI agents or informants agitating protesters on January 6th, the DOJ/FBI would rather huffily deny that they would ever do such a thing. They wouldn't say "Uh . . . uh . . . this is an ongoing blah blah blah"

You ever see a guy look shadier than this that answering a question?

1:43


Now, this senior official just wasn't aware of anything. That's the kind of "witness" the FBI likes to send to appear before these committees - those who don't know anything.


They also like witnesses who will simply refuse to answer questions such as:

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participate in the events of January 6th?

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th?

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively encourage or incite acts of violence on January 6th?


Now, maybe you don't want to know the answer to those questions. Maybe if it was to make Trump look bad, you are fine with FBI agents or confidential informants being paid to turn a peaceful protest into a deadly riot. If so, be honest and say that you are.

I believe the American people have a right and a need to know if their tax dollars are being spent for that.

Interestingly, Wray was quick to defend ANTIFA as not being a part of it, in spite that "ongoing investigation," cannard But he was eager to say that ANTIFA wasn't there. Case CLOSED! Likely with no investigation at all to remain "ongoing."

Yes, you used your logic and reasoning, but you gotta accept the fact that those were MAGA logic and MAGA reasoning. Both are as screwed up as Hogan's goat.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
102,649
Reaction score
26,669
Points
2,210
Yes, they keep them a secret, so or course they are not "known."

We have to use our logic and reasoning to understand that if there were no DOJ/FBI agents or informants agitating protesters on January 6th, the DOJ/FBI would rather huffily deny that they would ever do such a thing. They wouldn't say "Uh . . . uh . . . this is an ongoing blah blah blah"

You ever see a guy look shadier than this that answering a question?

1:43


Now, this senior official just wasn't aware of anything. That's the kind of "witness" the FBI likes to send to appear before these committees - those who don't know anything.


They also like witnesses who will simply refuse to answer questions such as:

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participate in the events of January 6th?

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th?

Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively encourage or incite acts of violence on January 6th?


Now, maybe you don't want to know the answer to those questions. Maybe if it was to make Trump look bad, you are fine with FBI agents or confidential informants being paid to turn a peaceful protest into a deadly riot. If so, be honest and say that you are.

I believe the American people have a right and a need to know if their tax dollars are being spent for that.

Interestingly, Wray was quick to defend ANTIFA as not being a part of it, in spite that "ongoing investigation," cannard But he was eager to say that ANTIFA wasn't there. Case CLOSED! Likely with no investigation at all to remain "ongoing."


Not discussing aspects of an ongoing investigation does not translate into there were government agitators there.
 

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Messages
6,042
Reaction score
4,512
Points
1,938
Location
Texas
Not discussing aspects of an ongoing investigation does not translate into there were government agitators there
It translates into hiding information from the people and their representatives. If Donald Trump takes the fifth will you say that does not make him look guilty?

You don't have to talk about an ongoing investigation to Simply say of course the FBI does not send agitators to turn peaceful protest into riots. Why can't they just say that?

Hint: it's because they are under oath.
 
Last edited:

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
102,649
Reaction score
26,669
Points
2,210
It translates into hiding information from the people and their representatives. If Donald Trump takes the fifth will you say that does not make him look guilty?

You don't have to talk about an ongoing investigation to Simply say of course the FBI does not send agitators to turn peaceful protest into riots. Why can't they just say that?

Hint: it's because they are under oath.

Sadly, your imagination is not a substitute for reality. Just sayin'.
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

New Topics

Forum List

Top