Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How much are these people actually getting from the government?
Wow, what a guy^What difference does it make? It doesn't change the point that these people either irresponsibly or deliberately had children they couldn't afford. If it were up to me, anybody applying for any public assistance would have to be fixed first. Of course we the taxpayers will pay for it because it would be a huge investment on our part. That's how you take steps to lower poverty in the country.
Wow, what a guy^
Indeed, there's been nothing impeding the development of healthy unions but corporate interests. They've employed lobbyists, the Pinkerton police, even the National Guard at times. Corporate capitalists corruptly employing "force of Government" to do their dirty work for them has been their specialty.Is there something preventing them from doing so? Why does this have to happen by force of Government? That seems to be the least advantageous way of going about it for everyone frankly.
More lately they've just been throwing the entire Union Busting Playbook at the slightest hint of a problem. But, go ahead. Convince yourself that's all just resulted from some random, happy coincidence. You know you want to!During the labor strikes of the late 19th, 20th and 21st centuries,[5] businessmen hired the Pinkerton Agency to infiltrate unions, supply guards, keep strikers and suspected unionists out of factories, and recruit goon squads to intimidate workers.
I dont know that I believe the solution to an out of control Government being used improperly is more improper use of the Government. It might seem expedient at the time but it will just lead to the need for more Government "solutions" in the long run. There's no doubt that too many of our politicians are beholden to corporate interests, but giving them more power isnt the answer.Indeed, there's been nothing impeding the development of healthy unions but corporate interests. They've employed lobbyists, the Pinkerton police, even the National Guard at times. Corporate capitalists corruptly employing "force of Government" to do their dirty work for them has been their specialty.
More lately they've just been throwing the entire Union Busting Playbook at the slightest hint of a problem. But, go ahead. Convince yourself that's all just resulted from some random, happy coincidence. You know you want to!
The key thing to keep in mind here is who you wish government to primarily serve, the people or corporations? Choosy fascists choose the latter.
States, cities and counties are free to set their MW wherever they want to. Why does Washington have to force everyone to the same level?The poverty rate has stayed essentially the same since 1970. I think having a min wage and raising it would have worked by now.
Giving government what "more power"? MW legislation passed long ago. It's pedestrian and well established. What are you smoking?I dont know that I believe the solution to an out of control Government being used improperly is more improper use of the Government. It might seem expedient at the time but it will just lead to the need for more Government "solutions" in the long run. There's no doubt that too many of our politicians are beholden to corporate interests, but giving them more power isnt the answer.
Never too late to repeal bullshit laws. Wage and price controls are recognized inroads of socialist campaigners. And it's not out of concern for the poor. They use them to set precedent, and get people used to idea that government should actively intervene in the economy.Giving government what "more power"? MW legislation passed long ago. It's pedestrian and well established. What are you smoking?
Yeah. Never quite got that math on that one.There's no doubt that too many of our politicians are beholden to corporate interests, but giving them more power isnt the answer.
Well you talk about it like they get so much that it's a viable strategy to just have a bunch of kids and live off the government. The accuracy of that view depends on how much they are actually getting.What difference does it make? It doesn't change the point that these people either irresponsibly or deliberately had children they couldn't afford. If it were up to me, anybody applying for any public assistance would have to be fixed first. Of course we the taxpayers will pay for it because it would be a huge investment on our part. That's how you take steps to lower poverty in the country.
Great. Now back to reality. Every major government has MWs except in Scandinavia. They have strong unions. Which do you prefer? No other reasonable solutions to check complete corporate fascism have yet emerged. Cut the "socialist" crap and get serious for a change.Never too late to repeal bullshit laws. Wage and price controls are recognized inroads of socialist campaigners. And it's not out of concern for the poor. They use them to set precedent, and get people used to idea that government should actively intervene in the economy.
And Germany, and Austria…….Great. Now back to reality. Every major government has MWs except in Scandinavia. They have strong unions. Which do you prefer? No other reasonable solutions to check complete corporate fascism have yet emerged. Cut the "socialist" crap and get serious for a change.
Well you talk about it like they get so much that it's a viable strategy to just have a bunch of kids and live off the government. The accuracy of that view depends on how much they are actually getting.
nypost.com
dailycaller.com
You do know the "$" comes BEFORE the number, right?Exactly. I'd rather make .50$ than a trillion a year if the cost of living were .10$ vs 500 billion.
The reality is, MW is a con. It buys votes from dummies, and it gives government more power - so it's no wonder our reps love it. But it's still bullshit.Great. Now back to reality.
And Germany, and Austria…….
but they do have them in Afghanistan
Germany’s minimum wage legislation (German: Gesetz zur Regelung eines allgemeinen Mindestlohns) was introduced on January 1, 2015 by Angela Merkel’s third government
Technically, there is no federal minimum wage in Austria. However, in January 2017, the Austrian government asked the social partners to negotiate a minimum wage that would apply to all industries in the country. Because of this, there is now an effective minimum wage in Austria of €1,500 a month.
Interestingly:The Afghanistan minimum wage rate is 5,000 Afghani per month for government workers with no minimum set for for private sector workers, but labor law forbids a lower wage. Informal sector day workers have no minimum wage set by law. Afghanistan's minimum wage was last changed in 1-Jan-2014.
I'll have spent more than that buying a bus later on today.
Local Name Afganistan/Afqanestan Gross National Product $5,976.00
Afghanistan has a government-mandated minimum wage, and no worker in Afghanistan can be paid less then this mandatory minimum rate of pay. Employers in Afghanistan who fail to pay the Minimum Wage may be subject to punishment by Afghanistan's government.
Ok, thanks.You do know the "$" comes BEFORE the number, right?
You must be an immigrant.
The reality is, MW is a con. It buys votes from dummies, and it gives government more power - so it's no wonder our reps love it. But it's still bullshit.
