Do You Think Obama Is Honest???

[mudwhistle]

Do You Think Obama Is Honest???

To a fault. Obviously.

Which means you think he's too honest...



Pretty pathetic.

I don't think any sane person actually believes he's honest. A more realistic person would admit he lies but that he has reasons.

 

[Article 15]

Your list of twenty lies from author Patrick Martin on the World Socialist Web Site......Ha, ha, ha. I can't believe you posted this crap....is a pack of lies in itself.

Says the guy who cites Conservapedia as a source.........

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Well you're an idiot so it's no shock that you didn't know that Conservapedia isn't a reliable source.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

I'll do even more than that....

Answer me this:

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

 

[L.K.Eder]

He's not a leader hell he couldn't lead toilet pape to hipe his ass effectivly

Yeah but how do you feel about him overall? Will you vote for him in 2012?

He's an empty suit with no subsatnce

Will you vote for him in 2012

I would shot myself before that thought ever gave birth to an action of stupidity.

who would you vote for if the choice was obama or hitler?

 

[mudwhistle]

Not all that great of a selection there, Mud.

Options two and three are the same.

No they aren't. Maybe you support Obama because you're a liar yourself.

I don't know what you're bitching about. I set it up so the folks that actually believe he's honest wouldn't look outnumbered by giving more then one no answer.

Mudwhistle calling me a liar .... the irony ....

Anyway, your poll sucks.

That's a matter of opinion....but it did reveal some truth.

There are some here that are outright delusional and some that are realistic.

It's delusional to claim he's totally honest.
It's more realistic to say he has reasons to lie or that everybody lies.
It is also a fact that he does lie and that his reasons are sometimes obvious.
It is also debatable sometimes why he lies when the truth would solve a lot of his problems.

 

[Stephanie]

Says the guy who cites Conservapedia as a source.........

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Well you're an idiot so it's no shock that you didn't know that Conservapedia isn't a reliable source.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

I'll do even more than that....

Answer me this:

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

What does any of this have to do with this thread?

 

[Article 15]

No they aren't. Maybe you support Obama because you're a liar yourself.

I don't know what you're bitching about. I set it up so the folks that actually believe he's honest wouldn't look outnumbered by giving more then one no answer.

Mudwhistle calling me a liar .... the irony ....

Anyway, your poll sucks.

That's a matter of opinion....but it did reveal some truth.

There are some here that are outright delusional and some that are realistic.

It's delusional to claim he's totally honest.
It's more realistic to say he has reasons to lie or that everybody lies.
It is also a fact that he does lie and that his reasons are sometimes obvious.
It is also debatable sometimes why he lies when the truth would solve a lot of his problems.

Then why not put an option that "he lie but has his reasons"?

Again, your poll sucks.

 

[Article 15]

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Well you're an idiot so it's no shock that you didn't know that Conservapedia isn't a reliable source.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

I'll do even more than that....

Answer me this:

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

What does any of this have to do with this thread?

Well if you could follow a thread properly....

Nah.

What does any of it have to do with you?

 

[mudwhistle]

Says the guy who cites Conservapedia as a source.........

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Well you're an idiot so it's no shock that you didn't know that Conservapedia isn't a reliable source.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

I'll do even more than that....

Answer me this:

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

Not always. Course who really knows of a source that is 100% reliable.

I think the truth is suffering these days because too much has been printed that is outright lies and passed off as truth.

These days everyone seems to have their own truth according to their ideology. It doesn't matter what the real truth is anymore.

 

[Article 15]

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Well you're an idiot so it's no shock that you didn't know that Conservapedia isn't a reliable source.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

I'll do even more than that....

Answer me this:

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

Not always. Course who really knows of a source that is 100% reliable.

I think the truth is suffering these days because too much has been printed that is outright lies and passed off as truth.

These days everyone seems to have their own truth according to their ideology. It doesn't matter what the real truth is anymore.

Would you accept a site called "Progressapedia" or "Liberalapedia" as a reliable source?

 

[mudwhistle]

Mudwhistle calling me a liar .... the irony ....

Anyway, your poll sucks.

That's a matter of opinion....but it did reveal some truth.

There are some here that are outright delusional and some that are realistic.

It's delusional to claim he's totally honest.
It's more realistic to say he has reasons to lie or that everybody lies.
It is also a fact that he does lie and that his reasons are sometimes obvious.
It is also debatable sometimes why he lies when the truth would solve a lot of his problems.

Then why not put an option that "he lie but has his reasons"?

Again, your poll sucks.

You're free to start your own sucky poll at any time.

 

[Article 15]

That's a matter of opinion....but it did reveal some truth.

There are some here that are outright delusional and some that are realistic.

It's delusional to claim he's totally honest.
It's more realistic to say he has reasons to lie or that everybody lies.
It is also a fact that he does lie and that his reasons are sometimes obvious.
It is also debatable sometimes why he lies when the truth would solve a lot of his problems.

Then why not put an option that "he lie but has his reasons"?

Again, your poll sucks.

You're free to start your own sucky poll at any time.

I'm not a big poll starter.

 

[Cuyo]

Your list of twenty lies from author Patrick Martin on the World Socialist Web Site......Ha, ha, ha. I can't believe you posted this crap....is a pack of lies in itself.

Says the guy who cites Conservapedia as a source.........

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

Dude, how old are you?

Can you seriously make it through the first couple sentences of any 'conservapedia' article and not know it's crap?

 

[Article 15]

Says the guy who cites Conservapedia as a source.........

I didn't know that Conservapedia was an unreliable source and I haven't seen anything that says it is other then a couple of bigmouths on this site.

Why don't you stop talking out of your ass and show me an article that proves the site is full of crap.

Dude, how old are you?

Can you seriously make it through the first couple sentences of any 'conservapedia' article and not know it's crap?

He's too busy nodding along.

 

[mudwhistle]

Well you're an idiot so it's no shock that you didn't know that Conservapedia isn't a reliable source.



I'll do even more than that....

Answer me this:

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

Not always. Course who really knows of a source that is 100% reliable.

I think the truth is suffering these days because too much has been printed that is outright lies and passed off as truth.

These days everyone seems to have their own truth according to their ideology. It doesn't matter what the real truth is anymore.

Would you accept a site called "Progressapedia" or "Liberalapedia" as a reliable source?

So the name not the actual content is what bugs you?

 

[Article 15]

Yeah but how do you feel about him overall? Will you vote for him in 2012?

He's an empty suit with no subsatnce

Will you vote for him in 2012

I would shot myself before that thought ever gave birth to an action of stupidity.

who would you vote for if the choice was obama or hitler?

 

[Stephanie]

Well you're an idiot so it's no shock that you didn't know that Conservapedia isn't a reliable source.



I'll do even more than that....

Answer me this:

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

What does any of this have to do with this thread?

Well if you could follow a thread properly....

Nah.

What does any of it have to do with you?

Just as I thought, it has NOTHING to do with it.

 

[Article 15]

Not always. Course who really knows of a source that is 100% reliable.

I think the truth is suffering these days because too much has been printed that is outright lies and passed off as truth.

These days everyone seems to have their own truth according to their ideology. It doesn't matter what the real truth is anymore.

Would you accept a site called "Progressapedia" or "Liberalapedia" as a reliable source?

So the name not the actual content is what bugs you?

Well when the name fits the content ....

Do you think Conservapedia is meant to give an unbiased view of things?

 

[mudwhistle]

Then why not put an option that "he lie but has his reasons"?

Again, your poll sucks.

You're free to start your own sucky poll at any time.

I'm not a big poll starter.

You're not too big on the truth ether are you?

 

[Article 15]

What does any of this have to do with this thread?

Well if you could follow a thread properly....

Nah.

What does any of it have to do with you?

Just as I thought, it has NOTHING to do with it.

Just as I thought, you are incapable of following the flow of a conversation.

 

[Article 15]

You're free to start your own sucky poll at any time.

I'm not a big poll starter.

You're not too big on the truth ether are you?

Actually, I'm a pretty big fan of it.