eots
no fly list
"The fucking buildings can be seen to explode, forcibly ejecting tons of outer perimeter walls hundreds of feet away and imbedding into adjacent buildings"-sister jonesAnswer something wihosa.
Are you suggesting that I could remove/weaken any steel columns on a given floor to a point that the remaining columns could have up to four times the load applied to them and remain structurally sound? How does one calculate the current safety factor of a building with a damaged structure?
For example. When the plane impacted the south tower, what was the saftey factor of floors 77 through 85 at that time? Was it still a safety factor of 4?
Can you show me the tests of how fireproofing reacts when impacted by jet debris?
Also, as you know, since you're a contractor, fireproofing is applied to EVERY single component in a structure including the connections. Contractors ALWAYS follow uniform application thickness and NEVER cut corners right?
Again this shit Gamolon spews that can not be backed up by any NIST testing. In fact we have shown that the testing and findings by NIST actually go against total and global collapses. Their studies have concluded that the fires did not attain temps high enough to weaken the steel supports. We also know that the fires were transient and moved consuming combustibles in the process, and anyone who knows anything about steel also knows that when this occurs, any steel that was affected by heat/fire will cool, and REGAIN much of its strength.
A look at the NIST report also tells us that the metallurgical studies performed on the recovered steel shows that NIST was surprised at how well it performed, even beyond their expectations, and that indeed the 'safety" factor was more then they assumed as well.
The fucking buildings can be seen to explode, forcibly ejecting tons of outer perimeter walls hundreds of feet away and imbedding into adjacent buildings.
They didn't simply collapse due to "weakening" and a look at the many videos can attest to this. The force needed to pulverize the concrete, over come the unaffected more robust lower parts of the buildings, AND eject tons of massive material, simply could not have been caused by low temp fires that NIST admitted moved, (thus allowing the steel to cool).
Gamolon wants to believe that once steel is heated to a weakened state it remains this way even though it has a chance to cool???LOL!!! This is just one of the many reasons why he is full of shit..
Can you? Can NIST? Please do so..
that's not an explosion, it's a collapse, the force you are yammering about is was not caused by explosives but the release of millions of joules of kinetic energy.
the ejecting was cause by the parts of the towers colliding with each other while falling.
and that changed the trajectory.
besides there is no visual or audio or physical evidence to prove any explosive were used.
Last edited by a moderator:
