Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They specified ORIGINAL ANCESTRY. Meaning there is a recognized incursion of darker skinned people that integrated with the ORIGINAL peoples.
How many races are there?
People in Appalachia shoot census takers here, brah.The US race census bureau defines white people, as people having original ancestry in europe, middle east or northafrica? I think while I agree that a good number of northafricans and middle easterners are light skinned and caucasian, that also a good number are somewhat too dark and too exotic to fit in the typical white image. The ones we perceive as "arabic" usually. I wouldnt call them undifferentiated all white. What do you think?
People in Appalachia shoot census takers here, brah.
That's a lil further south..People in Appalachia shoot census takers here, brah.
I would take being shot as a kindness, over the alternative ...
View attachment 362294
But the political Left didn't like the concept of "race," so they simply declared it out of existence. And contemporary young people are stupid and gullible enough to accept the provably false Narrative that race does not exist.
But the political Left didn't like the concept of "race," so they simply declared it out of existence. And contemporary young people are stupid and gullible enough to accept the provably false Narrative that race does not exist.
Fully disagree. From everything I've seen, the political Left LOVES the concept of "race." They use identity politics to divide and conquer, they started "Black studies" in academia to indoctrinate students into a single-minded narrative, the concept of "Black Lives Matter" falls into the same group-think political Left activism, and they do the same with other races/ethnicities, to divide people for their political benefit.
The political Right prefers the concept of color-blindness, not that the political Right is blind or ignorant of physical differences such as skin tone and whatnot, but that people should not be judged or given preferential treatment based on the concept of race.
But the political Left didn't like the concept of "race," so they simply declared it out of existence. And contemporary young people are stupid and gullible enough to accept the provably false Narrative that race does not exist.
Fully disagree. From everything I've seen, the political Left LOVES the concept of "race." They use identity politics to divide and conquer, they started "Black studies" in academia to indoctrinate students into a single-minded narrative, the concept of "Black Lives Matter" falls into the same group-think political Left activism, and they do the same with other races/ethnicities, to divide people for their political benefit.
The political Right prefers the concept of color-blindness, not that the political Right is blind or ignorant of physical differences such as skin tone and whatnot, but that people should not be judged or given preferential treatment based on the concept of race.
Because whites are at the top of the food chain by default so playing colourblind they reject processes that will bring not only equality before the law but actual equality in the society. So thats why the right does that.
The US race census bureau defines white people, as people having original ancestry in europe, middle east or northafrica? I think while I agree that a good number of northafricans and middle easterners are light skinned and caucasian, that also a good number are somewhat too dark and too exotic to fit in the typical white image. The ones we perceive as "arabic" usually. I wouldnt call them undifferentiated all white. What do you think?
But the political Left didn't like the concept of "race," so they simply declared it out of existence. And contemporary young people are stupid and gullible enough to accept the provably false Narrative that race does not exist.
Fully disagree. From everything I've seen, the political Left LOVES the concept of "race." They use identity politics to divide and conquer, they started "Black studies" in academia to indoctrinate students into a single-minded narrative, the concept of "Black Lives Matter" falls into the same group-think political Left activism, and they do the same with other races/ethnicities, to divide people for their political benefit.
The political Right prefers the concept of color-blindness, not that the political Right is blind or ignorant of physical differences such as skin tone and whatnot, but that people should not be judged or given preferential treatment based on the concept of race.
Because whites are at the top of the food chain by default so playing colourblind they reject processes that will bring not only equality before the law but actual equality in the society. So thats why the right does that.
No. First, you can't white-wash (pun unintended) things by saying "whites are at the top of the food chain." Some are well off, many are not. You could also make a case that Asians are "are at the top of the food chain" if you look at their achievements. And those who are not "at the top of the food chain" may well be there because of life choices they made or their parents made (e.g., absentee fathers, of which I have one).
Second, you cannot bring "equality" (and who decides what confirms and when equality is achieved) by divisive racial politics that the political Left engages in. That has never worked and will never work, for somebody will be punished. Redistribution punishes. Hiring by preferred races punishes. Unjust and arbitrary punishment divides. Healing only comes by dismantling the forces that divide us, namely the political Left. The political Left cannot succeed without successfully exploiting divisive racial politics.
Third, the Right favors colorblindness because that's how Christians are taught, to do unto others as themselves, to love thy neighbor, to not show favoritism or partiality. (And I recognize there are those on the political Right who are not Christian, but Christian values still have an influence on our society from our founding and all benefit kindly when people do unto others as themselves.)
But the political Left didn't like the concept of "race," so they simply declared it out of existence. And contemporary young people are stupid and gullible enough to accept the provably false Narrative that race does not exist.
Fully disagree. From everything I've seen, the political Left LOVES the concept of "race." They use identity politics to divide and conquer, they started "Black studies" in academia to indoctrinate students into a single-minded narrative, the concept of "Black Lives Matter" falls into the same group-think political Left activism, and they do the same with other races/ethnicities, to divide people for their political benefit.
The political Right prefers the concept of color-blindness, not that the political Right is blind or ignorant of physical differences such as skin tone and whatnot, but that people should not be judged or given preferential treatment based on the concept of race.
Because whites are at the top of the food chain by default so playing colourblind they reject processes that will bring not only equality before the law but actual equality in the society. So thats why the right does that.
No. First, you can't white-wash (pun unintended) things by saying "whites are at the top of the food chain." Some are well off, many are not. You could also make a case that Asians are "are at the top of the food chain" if you look at their achievements. And those who are not "at the top of the food chain" may well be there because of life choices they made or their parents made (e.g., absentee fathers, of which I have one).
Second, you cannot bring "equality" (and who decides what confirms and when equality is achieved) by divisive racial politics that the political Left engages in. That has never worked and will never work, for somebody will be punished. Redistribution punishes. Hiring by preferred races punishes. Unjust and arbitrary punishment divides. Healing only comes by dismantling the forces that divide us, namely the political Left. The political Left cannot succeed without successfully exploiting divisive racial politics.
Third, the Right favors colorblindness because that's how Christians are taught, to do unto others as themselves, to love thy neighbor, to not show favoritism or partiality. (And I recognize there are those on the political Right who are not Christian, but Christian values still have an influence on our society from our founding and all benefit kindly when people do unto others as themselves.)
True but imagine there is a 2 foot guy and there is a 4"2 midget, both watch a football game, you place the midget in the first row before the 2 foot guy so he can see the game, but the 2 foot guy feels discriminated then because he must be behind the midget? Do you consider that favouritism? Actually placing both in the same place, would mean the midget cannot see the game.
Kentucky Derby!
But the political Left didn't like the concept of "race," so they simply declared it out of existence. And contemporary young people are stupid and gullible enough to accept the provably false Narrative that race does not exist.
Fully disagree. From everything I've seen, the political Left LOVES the concept of "race." They use identity politics to divide and conquer, they started "Black studies" in academia to indoctrinate students into a single-minded narrative, the concept of "Black Lives Matter" falls into the same group-think political Left activism, and they do the same with other races/ethnicities, to divide people for their political benefit.
The political Right prefers the concept of color-blindness, not that the political Right is blind or ignorant of physical differences such as skin tone and whatnot, but that people should not be judged or given preferential treatment based on the concept of race.
Because whites are at the top of the food chain by default so playing colourblind they reject processes that will bring not only equality before the law but actual equality in the society. So thats why the right does that.
No. First, you can't white-wash (pun unintended) things by saying "whites are at the top of the food chain." Some are well off, many are not. You could also make a case that Asians are "are at the top of the food chain" if you look at their achievements. And those who are not "at the top of the food chain" may well be there because of life choices they made or their parents made (e.g., absentee fathers, of which I have one).
Second, you cannot bring "equality" (and who decides what confirms and when equality is achieved) by divisive racial politics that the political Left engages in. That has never worked and will never work, for somebody will be punished. Redistribution punishes. Hiring by preferred races punishes. Unjust and arbitrary punishment divides. Healing only comes by dismantling the forces that divide us, namely the political Left. The political Left cannot succeed without successfully exploiting divisive racial politics.
Third, the Right favors colorblindness because that's how Christians are taught, to do unto others as themselves, to love thy neighbor, to not show favoritism or partiality. (And I recognize there are those on the political Right who are not Christian, but Christian values still have an influence on our society from our founding and all benefit kindly when people do unto others as themselves.)
True but imagine there is a 2 foot guy and there is a 4"2 midget, both watch a football game, you place the midget in the first row before the 2 foot guy so he can see the game, but the 2 foot guy feels discriminated then because he must be behind the midget? Do you consider that favouritism? Actually placing both in the same place, would mean the midget cannot see the game.
As a taller person, I tend to get stuck in the back in a group photo so people only see my floating head instead of my head and sexy bod. As a taller person, leg room is terrible for me on an airplane, except that one time where I got that sweet seat by an exit door and had no chair in front of me. And I have to watch my head coming out of my shower at home.
With things of height, there are advantages and disadvantages. And you know what, I'm not going to complain much about it. I'll adapt to the situation.
If I need to stand so an elderly person or pregnant lady can sit on a bus, no big deal. There is room for favoritism, based out of kindness.
There is other forms of favoritism that are appalling. If I'm denied a job or a college choice based on skin color, or ethnicity, or that I wear glasses, or I'm too tall, then that would be a problem. If rejection is merit-based, I can accept that. If rejection is something beyond my control, like physical appearance, or ancestry, that is a problem that I am going to object to, for myself, and for others facing baseless discrimination.
But what if employers dont want to hire certain races,
and the law makes them do so? That is basically affirmative action to me.
Some white people who are good and intelligent get left out though, that is negative side effect.
