Dems want to pack the USSC

What the fuck is wrong with you? Why did you try googling Clarence Hill and find out why he’s so objectionable?Willie had two months of public hearings about it
The boxer or the Alabama murderer? This discussion is in regard to the USSC and no Clarence Hill has ever been there you demented dingbat. Given that you are less mentally functional than a rotten turnip, one can understand that you cannot mentally separate the esteemed Justice Clarence Thomas from the failed liar Anita Hill, so suggesting a turning to a search engine as a back up for your leftist fantasies doesn’t bolster your non case.
 
Mitch McConnell and the Republicans have already packed the supreme court with conservative nominees they had no right to make by their own rules.

What Democrats are proposing to do is to re-balance the court the way the founders intended. The supreme court isn’t supposed to be a bullwark against against the will of people. It’s supposed to be a protection for the Constitution.

It’s hard to imagine a protection for the constitution that has people like Clarence Hill and Brett Kavanaugh sitting on the bench.
The Republican Party played by the rules, it was a bad move by them, but it was within the rules.

Now, which rulings have they passed recently that is unconstitutiona?
 
What the fuck is wrong with you? Why did you try googling Clarence Hill and find out why he’s so objectionable?Willie had two months of public hearings about it
You may be thinking of Justice Clarence Thomas. The main witness at his confirmation was a woman named Anita Hill. It looks like you're confusing their names.
 

Forum List

Back
Top