What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dems want Laws changed after Rittenhouse shootings. Are vigilantes the answer? (Poll)

Do you support vigilantes policing neighborhoods when the police are unavailable?

  • Yes, people have the right to protect their lives and property

    Votes: 64 95.5%
  • No, criminals have every right to burn, steal, and kill.

    Votes: 3 4.5%

  • Total voters
    67

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,319
Reaction score
11,122
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
Absolute lies.

He was not an active shooter. Nor did he engage anyone in a threatening manner.

He was attacked without provocation and had every right to defend himself

Incel Joe is consistent in its repeatedly-expressed position that human beings have no right or justification to defend themselves against attack by subhuman criminal pieces of shit. It will always take the side of its own kind against that of humans.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,319
Reaction score
11,122
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
So he was right and EVERYONE in that Crowd was wrong?

A crowd that consisted almost entirely of subhuman criminal; pieces of shit that were actively engaging in acts of theft, destruction and violence.

Yes, nearly everyone in that crowd was wrong.
 
Last edited:

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,319
Reaction score
11,122
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
So he was right and EVERYONE in that Crowd was wrong?
You should understand being wrong when everyone else is right all the time.

In order to understand that, Incel Joe would have to have a grasp of the distinction between right and wrong; to have the ability to understand that stealing is wrong, destroying property is wrong, and assaulting people is wrong.

It would have to be able to understand that the objection that actual human beings have to such behavior is not merely “racism”.

To have such understanding would require one to be in possession of a soul and a conscience. Can it possibly be any more obvious than it is, that Incel Joe is completely lacking these essential elements of humanity, which distinguish us as humans from mere wild animals such as itself?
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,830
Reaction score
18,245
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
onsistent in its repeatedly-expressed position that human beings have no right or justification to defend themselves against attack by subhuman criminal pieces of shit. It will always take the side of its own kind against that of humans.

Guy, you aren't talking about defending people, you are talking about defending PROPERTY. Property isn't more valuable than human lives.

In order to understand that, @Incel Joe would have to have a grasp of the distinction between right and wrong; to have the ability to understand that stealing is wrong, destroying property is wrong, and assaulting people is wrong.
Cops murdering children is wrong.
Racists murdering peaceful demonstrators is wrong.
Whacky cults started by Child molesting con men are wrong.

Nope, Seems I have it covered.
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,830
Reaction score
18,245
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
A crowd that consisted almost entirely of subhuman criminal; pieces of shit that were actively engaging in acts of theft, destruction and violence.

Yes, nearly everyone in that crowd was wrong.

Except the only people killed that night were killed by Rittenhouse.

Everyone in that crowd was out because a thug cop shot an unarmed man in the back 7 times.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,319
Reaction score
11,122
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
Guy, you aren't talking about defending people, you are talking about defending PROPERTY. Property isn't more valuable than human lives.

Once again, that's a call to be made by any creature that is contemplating the theft or destruction of someone's property. If it values its own life more than the opportunity to steal or destroy what does not belong to it, then it can always choose not to do so.


Cops murdering children is wrong.
Racists murdering peaceful demonstrators is wrong.
Whacky cults started by Child molesting con men are wrong.

None of that has happened in connection with anything being discussed in this thread.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,319
Reaction score
11,122
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
Except the only people killed that night were killed by Rittenhouse.

Once again, those were not people. They were criminals.

Denying the distinction between criminals and human beings will not make that distinction go away.
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,830
Reaction score
18,245
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
Once again, that's a call to be made by any creature that is contemplating the theft or destruction of someone's property. If it values its own life more than the opportunity to steal or destroy what does not belong to it, then it can always choose not to do so.

The fact you are willing to murder someone over a flat screen or a pair of sneakers kind of makes you a sociopath, Mormon Bob. Heck, I can't even blame your cult on that one, I think even other Mormons would be horrified by that.

Once again, those were not people. They were criminals.

Funny, I picture Hitler saying the same thing about Jews.
Or the people who chased your cult out of four states saying that about Mormons.

None of that has happened in connection with anything being discussed in this thread.

Really? So you just pretend that police misconduct isn't a thing, then.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,319
Reaction score
11,122
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
The fact you are willing to murder someone over a flat screen or a pair of sneakers kind of makes you a sociopath, Mormon Bob

You openly take the side of criminals against that of human beings. Always.

This leaves you in no position whatsoever to point fingers at anyone else and call anyone else a sociopath. You're pretty much the defining model of a sociopath.

In fact, you're something lower, really, than a sociopath.

A true sociopath ignores or dismisses any distinction between good and evil, between reason and madness. You are actively on the side of evil and madness.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
19,319
Reaction score
11,122
Points
1,265
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
Once again, those were not people. They were criminals.
Funny, I picture Hitler saying the same thing about Jews.
Or the people who chased your cult out of four states saying that about Mormons.

I suppose that makes sense if we define being a criminal as being equivalent to being of any particular race and/or religion.

And now that I think of it, there is ample evidence that unlike any rational human being, that is exactly how you do see it. Plenty of evidence that you think that it is “racist” to oppose the destructive behavior of criminals; and I have little doubt that if you had the power to do so and get away with it, you would gladly treat Mormons (and Catholics, and probably members of many other religions, if not all religions) exactly as Hitler treated Jews.
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
139,830
Reaction score
18,245
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
You openly take the side of criminals against that of human beings. Always.

This leaves you in no position whatsoever to point fingers at anyone else and call anyone else a sociopath. You're pretty much the defining model of a sociopath.

Uh, guy, you want to murder people over property.
You want to murder women who have abortions
You want to murder people who are gay or trans.

You are a sociopath.

I don't think killing someone over a pair of sneakers is a good thing... I'm sorry you do.

I suppose that makes sense if we define being a criminal as being equivalent to being of any particular race and/or religion.

Actually, religion is a choice.
Crime is a choice.
Killing people for making bad choices is wrong.

We have crime because we have societal issues we refuse to address, despite our wealth as a nation.

And now that I think of it, there is ample evidence that unlike any rational human being, that is exactly how you do see it. Plenty of evidence that you think that it is “racist” to oppose the destructive behavior of criminals; and I have little doubt that if you had the power to do so and get away with it, you would gladly treat Mormons (and Catholics, and probably members of many other religions, if not all religions) exactly as Hitler treated Jews.

Most of my family are practicing Catholics. So you'd be wrong. I am also Godfather to two of my nieces. (My hostility towards religions wanes and ebbs over the years.) So you'd be wrong again.

The problem is that our criminal justice system IS racist. The black kid who does some drugs gets prison, people like Cindy McCain and Rush Limbaugh get rehab. Tamir Rice gets blown away for playing with a toy, while the assholes who marched on state capitols with guns are left alone.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top