Demonicrats now saying Gabbard in "collusion" with Russia

wamose

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
5,068
Reaction score
3,206
Points
1,015
Location
Pennsylvania
Poor Tulsi is finding out what happens when you cross mental patients in high places.
 

norwegen

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,763
Reaction score
2,121
Points
280
Location
Ormond Beach, FL
If she ever realizes who the left really are and turns conservative, there's just one question to ask: "What the hell took you so long?"
 

RandomPoster

Gold Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
2,107
Reaction score
773
Points
265
"Hillary Clinton implied in a recent interview that Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is being “groomed” by Russia to run a third-party candidacy.

“I’m not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate. She’s the favorite of the Russians,” Clinton in an interview with former Obama campaign manager David Plouffe."

Hillary Clinton Suggests Tulsi Gabbard Is Being 'Groomed' By Russia For Third Party Run

 

wamose

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
5,068
Reaction score
3,206
Points
1,015
Location
Pennsylvania
I think this is the position that finally exposes that Clinton lady to be the total wackjob that she is
 

g5000

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
93,860
Reaction score
15,532
Points
2,180
I've been saying from the get-go that Tulsi Gabbard is a younger female version of Bernie Sanders, but Clinton is smoking crack if she thinks Gabbard is a tool of Putin. Trump is filling that job right now. :D

After all, he did just surrender the Middle East to Russia this week.

You can hear Clinton's whackadoo "prediction" here: https://podcasts.google.com/?feed=a...-AKHZsMC_AQieUEegQIABAE&ep=6&at=1571406131757

Go to the 35 minute mark.
 

Bo Didleysquat

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
6,204
Reaction score
547
Points
65
Poor Tulsi is finding out what happens when you cross mental patients in high places.
Nah, she crossed the endless utterly bipartisan war machine. Americans have decided to house their most twisted and demonic aristocrats into high places and this is what happens.
 
OP
WTH_Progs?

WTH_Progs?

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
3,106
Reaction score
1,594
Points
940
If she ever realizes who the left really are and turns conservative, there's just one question to ask: "What the hell took you so long?"
BINGO............Who knows why she chose the party she did, but it's clear to me she doesn't fit.
 

Bo Didleysquat

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
6,204
Reaction score
547
Points
65
If she ever realizes who the left really are and turns conservative, there's just one question to ask: "What the hell took you so long?"
AND she can keep the same donors, if she knocks off this "endless war is stupid" stuff.
 

kyzr

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
15,427
Reaction score
5,863
Points
350
Location
The AL part of PA
Can Tulsi sue the crazy Clinton lady for libel?
(the crazy Clinton lady still has lots of money)
 

Muhammed

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
19,117
Reaction score
5,020
Points
290
Location
North Coast, USA
So Hillary is making false Russia, Russia, Russia claims against another political foe. Another foe that she knows would whoop her in a debate.

She's probably running again, but will announce very late in the game because the ravages of decades of hard drinking have left her mentally and physically incapable of sustaining a protracted campaign.
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
116,586
Reaction score
18,585
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
You Democrats should take it as God-spell too, just as you always do.

Hillary Clinton Claims Russians ‘Grooming’ Tulsi Gabbard as Third-Party Candidate
You might want to actually watch the video and listen to the podcast source in your own link. The characterization was attributed (by Gabbard) to commentators in the New York Times and CNN, not to Clinton.

As for what Clinton actually said, again from your own link:

"They're also gonna do third party again. I'm not making any predictions but I think they've got their eye on somebody who's currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be their third party candidate.... they KNOW they can't win without a third party candidate"​

That's at 35:36. "They" refers to external propagandists playing the distraction game after noting that Rump could not win a majority of the vote in Wisconsin, Michigan (Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Florida etc) and would therefore be concentrating on shunting votes that Rump would not get anyway off to third party candidates. It's about Russian-Rumpian collusion. She doesn't even mention Gabbard's name.

She also says earlier:
"Part of what we have to do is alert the campaigns and try to protect them... try to raise the alarm about the breaches of our election system, try to stand up against the misinformation, weaponization of information, propaganda".​

You didn't bother to vet your own pseudo-article, did you. NOWHERE does she say or imply that Gabbard (or anybody else) is in "collusion with Russia". PROVE ME WRONG.

Oh and one more thing --- "Hillary Clinton" -- the singular -- is not "Democrats" the plural.
 
Last edited:

JoeMoma

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Messages
15,740
Reaction score
3,175
Points
290
Maybe Hillary was talking about herself. Vlad would probably love for her to run as a third party candidate.
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
116,586
Reaction score
18,585
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
So Hillary is making false Russia, Russia, Russia claims against another political foe. Another foe that she knows would whoop her in a debate.

She's probably running again, but will announce very late in the game because the ravages of decades of hard drinking have left her mentally and physically incapable of sustaining a protracted campaign.
Once again --- the commentary is about outside propaganda, not about an unnamed candidate that this wacko pseudoarticle plugged in. Go ahead and listen to it instead of swallowing hard every time some wacko pseudoarticle says "jump".
 

wamose

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
5,068
Reaction score
3,206
Points
1,015
Location
Pennsylvania
Can Tulsi sue the crazy Clinton lady for libel?
(the crazy Clinton lady still has lots of money)
That's true but they might need it if the truth about Epstein becomes public. That's why the Clintons and other establishment criminals love the crooked deep state. Protection
 

Muhammed

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
19,117
Reaction score
5,020
Points
290
Location
North Coast, USA
So Hillary is making false Russia, Russia, Russia claims against another political foe. Another foe that she knows would whoop her in a debate.

She's probably running again, but will announce very late in the game because the ravages of decades of hard drinking have left her mentally and physically incapable of sustaining a protracted campaign.
Once again --- the commentary is about outside propaganda, not about an unnamed candidate that this wacko pseudoarticle plugged in. Go ahead and listen to it instead of swallowing hard every time some wacko pseudoarticle says "jump".
The only Russian influence that damaged Clinton's campaign....

 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
116,586
Reaction score
18,585
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
Sorry, this has already been raked.

You might want to actually watch the video and listen to the podcast source in your own link. The characterization was attributed (by Gabbard) to commentators in the New York Times and CNN, not to Clinton.

As for what Clinton actually said, again from your own link:

"They're also gonna do third party again. I'm not making any predictions but I think they've got their eye on somebody who's currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be their third party candidate.... they KNOW they can't win without a third party candidate"
That's at 35:36. "They" refers to external propagandists playing the distraction game after noting that Rump could not win a majority of the vote in Wisconsin, Michigan (Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Florida etc) and would therefore be concentrating on shunting votes that Rump would not get anyway off to third party candidates. It's about Russian-Rumpian collusion. She doesn't even mention Gabbard's name.

She also says earlier:
"Part of what we have to do is alert the campaigns and try to protect them... try to raise the alarm about the breaches of our election system, try to stand up against the misinformation, weaponization of information, propaganda".
You didn't bother to vet your own pseudo-article, did you. NOWHERE does she say or imply that Gabbard (or anybody else) is in "collusion with Russia". PROVE ME WRONG.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top