Democrats, What Can They Say?

Peony

Rookie
Mar 10, 2016
31
41
3
A few weeks ago, some democrats attended a seminar on how to talk to regular people. You see, they figure maybe those crushing loses in November may be somewhat related to how they present their ideas. They have to make a change, find a hook- like Hillary’s famous, “I ain’t no ways tired” schtick that worked so beautifully in winning the hearts of black people!

Democrats wonder if ordinary folk just don’t understand their clever nuance. They talk differently. They listen differently. So, some dems are flirting with the idea of finding a new way to communicate with all those dummies who don’t live (or aspire to live) in NY, CA, Washington DC, or don’t run to a safe space at the first whiff of differing opinion. You know, those prejudiced deplorables.

Not too many took advantage of this (good for a write off) wine and cheese seminar weekend. Apparently, it was a bit of a bust. They were supposed to learn how to triangulate those rubes from the middle of the country but the seminar leader apparently never mastered the Fly Over dialect.


If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.


It sure doesn’t look like democrats are truly looking to change their message, or the way it’s presented. Nancy Pelosi is back as House spokes mouth. She continues to spout half-truths, innuendo and outright nonsense. Just the other day, she went on a rant about a tweet of Mike Flynn’s- only it wasn’t Mike Flynn’s tweet. (Who’s for another round of Fake News?)

Chuck Schumer has picked up where Harry Reid left off. Just blurt something out! People might think it’s true! Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes, announced Reid. Donald Trump is embarrassed about his cabinet nominees, says Chuck. That’s why he wants to hurry up and have them approved.

What democrats need to learn is that more and more Americans are on to them. They understand that dishonesty is the democrat dialect, so they don’t believe them anymore.


Maybe it doesn’t matter if democrats don’t articulate to all Americans. There are other paths to communication skullduggery and government bureaucrats who remain true to the party line are on it. EPA drones had a good cry and now are protesting Scott Pruitt as head of the department. Is Pruitt incompetent? Nah. He just isn’t a leftist. These workers are entitled to their opinions but they don’t get to pick their boss. That’s not stopping them from emoting. Save the planet! Don’t let Donald Trump pick the head of the EPA!

Other government bureaucrats have surely had a hand in getting Mike Flynn kicked out of the Trump administration. We don’t really know what was said and not said in Flynn’s phone call with the Russian Ambassador. We do know that there was a leak about the phone call itself, and it had to have come from someone in a government department able to listen in on Flynn. So we have a sudden anonymous leak. The democrats and their media allies add a dash of innuendo and Flynn looked bad. We are told Flynn didn’t tell Pence all the details about a conversation. Now Flynn is out. Will we hear about who is doing this illegal leaking? Doesn’t seem so, the media has moved on to complaining about how much money is being spent to protect Trump and his family.

And they wonder why Trump considers them purveyors of Fake News.


There is surely more democrat talk on the way. Former president Barack Obama promised he was not leaving, that he intends to return to his roots. That would be Community Organizing, where all that is accomplished, is talk.


We’ll hear.



http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/democrats-real-people-lessons-234198

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13525/poll-would-trump-win-re-election-against-elizabeth-hank-berrien

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html

Insiders: Obama Holdover 'Shadow Government' Plotting to Undermine Trump - Breitbart

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-gop-wants-rush-through-cabinet-nominees-because-theyre-ashamed-them

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats/index.html?sr=twpol021817liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats1131PMVODtopLink&linkId=34650328

Who Rules the United States?
 
Last edited:
A few weeks ago, some democrats attended a seminar on how to talk to regular people. You see, they figure maybe those crushing loses in November may be somewhat related to how they present their ideas. They have to make a change, find a hook- like Hillary’s famous, “I ain’t no ways tired” schtick that worked so beautifully in winning the hearts of black people!

Democrats wonder if ordinary folk just don’t understand their clever nuance. They talk differently. They listen differently. So, some dems are flirting with the idea of finding a new way to communicate with all those dummies who don’t live (or aspire to live) in NY, CA, Washington DC, or don’t run to a safe space at the first whiff of differing opinion. You know, those prejudiced deplorables.

Not too many took advantage of this (good for a write off) wine and cheese seminar weekend. Apparently, it was a bit of a bust. They were supposed to learn how to triangulate those rubes from the middle of the country but the seminar leader apparently never mastered the Fly Over dialect.


If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.


It sure doesn’t look like democrats are truly looking to change their message, or the way it’s presented. Nancy Pelosi is back as House spokes mouth. She continues to spout half-truths, innuendo and outright nonsense. Just the other day, she went on a rant about a tweet of Mike Flynn’s- only it wasn’t Mike Flynn’s tweet. (Who’s for another round of Fake News?)

Chuck Schumer has picked up where Harry Reid left off. Just blurt something out! People might think it’s true! Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes, announced Reid. Donald Trump is embarrassed about his cabinet nominees, says Chuck. That’s why he wants to hurry up and have them approved.

What democrats need to learn is that more and more Americans are on to them. They understand that dishonesty is the democrat dialect, so they don’t believe them anymore.


Maybe it doesn’t matter if democrats don’t articulate to all Americans. There are other paths to communication skullduggery and government bureaucrats who remain true to the party line are on it. EPA drones had a good cry and now are protesting Scott Pruitt as head of the department. Is Pruitt incompetent? Nah. He just isn’t a leftist. These workers are entitled to their opinions but they don’t get to pick their boss. That’s not stopping them from emoting. Save the planet! Don’t let Donald Trump pick the head of the EPA!

Other government bureaucrats have surely had a hand in getting Mike Flynn kicked out of the Trump administration. We don’t really know what was said and not said in Flynn’s phone call with the Russian Ambassador. We do know that there was a leak about the phone call itself, and it had to have come from someone in a government department able to listen in on Flynn. So we have a sudden anonymous leak. The democrats and their media allies add a dash of innuendo and Flynn looked bad. We are told Flynn didn’t tell Pence all the details about a conversation. Now Flynn is out. Will we hear about who is doing this illegal leaking? Doesn’t seem so, the media has moved on to complaining about how much money is being spent to protect Trump and his family.

And they wonder why Trump considers them purveyors of Fake News.


There is surely more democrat talk on the way. Former president Barack Obama promised he was not leaving, that he intends to return to his roots. That would be Community Organizing, where all that is accomplished, is talk.


We’ll hear.



http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/democrats-real-people-lessons-234198

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13525/poll-would-trump-win-re-election-against-elizabeth-hank-berrien

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html

Insiders: Obama Holdover 'Shadow Government' Plotting to Undermine Trump - Breitbart

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-gop-wants-rush-through-cabinet-nominees-because-theyre-ashamed-them

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats/index.html?sr=twpol021817liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats1131PMVODtopLink&linkId=34650328

Who Rules the United States?
:clap2:
 
A few weeks ago, some democrats attended a seminar on how to talk to regular people. You see, they figure maybe those crushing loses in November may be somewhat related to how they present their ideas. They have to make a change, find a hook- like Hillary’s famous, “I ain’t no ways tired” schtick that worked so beautifully in winning the hearts of black people!

Democrats wonder if ordinary folk just don’t understand their clever nuance. They talk differently. They listen differently. So, some dems are flirting with the idea of finding a new way to communicate with all those dummies who don’t live (or aspire to live) in NY, CA, Washington DC, or don’t run to a safe space at the first whiff of differing opinion. You know, those prejudiced deplorables.

Not too many took advantage of this (good for a write off) wine and cheese seminar weekend. Apparently, it was a bit of a bust. They were supposed to learn how to triangulate those rubes from the middle of the country but the seminar leader apparently never mastered the Fly Over dialect.


If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.


It sure doesn’t look like democrats are truly looking to change their message, or the way it’s presented. Nancy Pelosi is back as House spokes mouth. She continues to spout half-truths, innuendo and outright nonsense. Just the other day, she went on a rant about a tweet of Mike Flynn’s- only it wasn’t Mike Flynn’s tweet. (Who’s for another round of Fake News?)

Chuck Schumer has picked up where Harry Reid left off. Just blurt something out! People might think it’s true! Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes, announced Reid. Donald Trump is embarrassed about his cabinet nominees, says Chuck. That’s why he wants to hurry up and have them approved.

What democrats need to learn is that more and more Americans are on to them. They understand that dishonesty is the democrat dialect, so they don’t believe them anymore.


Maybe it doesn’t matter if democrats don’t articulate to all Americans. There are other paths to communication skullduggery and government bureaucrats who remain true to the party line are on it. EPA drones had a good cry and now are protesting Scott Pruitt as head of the department. Is Pruitt incompetent? Nah. He just isn’t a leftist. These workers are entitled to their opinions but they don’t get to pick their boss. That’s not stopping them from emoting. Save the planet! Don’t let Donald Trump pick the head of the EPA!

Other government bureaucrats have surely had a hand in getting Mike Flynn kicked out of the Trump administration. We don’t really know what was said and not said in Flynn’s phone call with the Russian Ambassador. We do know that there was a leak about the phone call itself, and it had to have come from someone in a government department able to listen in on Flynn. So we have a sudden anonymous leak. The democrats and their media allies add a dash of innuendo and Flynn looked bad. We are told Flynn didn’t tell Pence all the details about a conversation. Now Flynn is out. Will we hear about who is doing this illegal leaking? Doesn’t seem so, the media has moved on to complaining about how much money is being spent to protect Trump and his family.

And they wonder why Trump considers them purveyors of Fake News.


There is surely more democrat talk on the way. Former president Barack Obama promised he was not leaving, that he intends to return to his roots. That would be Community Organizing, where all that is accomplished, is talk.


We’ll hear.



http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/democrats-real-people-lessons-234198

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13525/poll-would-trump-win-re-election-against-elizabeth-hank-berrien

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html

Insiders: Obama Holdover 'Shadow Government' Plotting to Undermine Trump - Breitbart

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-gop-wants-rush-through-cabinet-nominees-because-theyre-ashamed-them

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats/index.html?sr=twpol021817liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats1131PMVODtopLink&linkId=34650328

Who Rules the United States?

Dear Peony
You can't fix what's wrong with a house by just painting the outside.
The foundation has a huge crack.

My fellow Democrats are plagued with this political religion based on
power and authority by majority rule. One of my friends, a lifelong Democrat,
explained it to me that since there is no stopping the bigger bully, the only hope
is to use the party to bully back.

So much for Constitutional respect and inclusion, and consent of the governed.
These concepts don't exist where "majority rule" decides what passes as law,
not Constitutional checks and balances and AGREEMENT among States and people
what to authorize to our federal govt.

Once people start voting in whatever is popular, anything goes.

Gotta agree on the SPIRIT of the laws and the process.
THEN the words we need to communicate will follow
when we are ACTUALLY TRYING TO GET ON THE SAME PAGE.

Using words for bullyign and propaganda is not the same.
 
A few weeks ago, some democrats attended a seminar on how to talk to regular people. You see, they figure maybe those crushing loses in November may be somewhat related to how they present their ideas. They have to make a change, find a hook- like Hillary’s famous, “I ain’t no ways tired” schtick that worked so beautifully in winning the hearts of black people!

Democrats wonder if ordinary folk just don’t understand their clever nuance. They talk differently. They listen differently. So, some dems are flirting with the idea of finding a new way to communicate with all those dummies who don’t live (or aspire to live) in NY, CA, Washington DC, or don’t run to a safe space at the first whiff of differing opinion. You know, those prejudiced deplorables.

Not too many took advantage of this (good for a write off) wine and cheese seminar weekend. Apparently, it was a bit of a bust. They were supposed to learn how to triangulate those rubes from the middle of the country but the seminar leader apparently never mastered the Fly Over dialect.


If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.


It sure doesn’t look like democrats are truly looking to change their message, or the way it’s presented. Nancy Pelosi is back as House spokes mouth. She continues to spout half-truths, innuendo and outright nonsense. Just the other day, she went on a rant about a tweet of Mike Flynn’s- only it wasn’t Mike Flynn’s tweet. (Who’s for another round of Fake News?)

Chuck Schumer has picked up where Harry Reid left off. Just blurt something out! People might think it’s true! Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes, announced Reid. Donald Trump is embarrassed about his cabinet nominees, says Chuck. That’s why he wants to hurry up and have them approved.

What democrats need to learn is that more and more Americans are on to them. They understand that dishonesty is the democrat dialect, so they don’t believe them anymore.


Maybe it doesn’t matter if democrats don’t articulate to all Americans. There are other paths to communication skullduggery and government bureaucrats who remain true to the party line are on it. EPA drones had a good cry and now are protesting Scott Pruitt as head of the department. Is Pruitt incompetent? Nah. He just isn’t a leftist. These workers are entitled to their opinions but they don’t get to pick their boss. That’s not stopping them from emoting. Save the planet! Don’t let Donald Trump pick the head of the EPA!

Other government bureaucrats have surely had a hand in getting Mike Flynn kicked out of the Trump administration. We don’t really know what was said and not said in Flynn’s phone call with the Russian Ambassador. We do know that there was a leak about the phone call itself, and it had to have come from someone in a government department able to listen in on Flynn. So we have a sudden anonymous leak. The democrats and their media allies add a dash of innuendo and Flynn looked bad. We are told Flynn didn’t tell Pence all the details about a conversation. Now Flynn is out. Will we hear about who is doing this illegal leaking? Doesn’t seem so, the media has moved on to complaining about how much money is being spent to protect Trump and his family.

And they wonder why Trump considers them purveyors of Fake News.


There is surely more democrat talk on the way. Former president Barack Obama promised he was not leaving, that he intends to return to his roots. That would be Community Organizing, where all that is accomplished, is talk.


We’ll hear.



http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/democrats-real-people-lessons-234198

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13525/poll-would-trump-win-re-election-against-elizabeth-hank-berrien

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html

Insiders: Obama Holdover 'Shadow Government' Plotting to Undermine Trump - Breitbart

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-gop-wants-rush-through-cabinet-nominees-because-theyre-ashamed-them

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats/index.html?sr=twpol021817liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats1131PMVODtopLink&linkId=34650328

Who Rules the United States?

Dear Peony
You can't fix what's wrong with a house by just painting the outside.
The foundation has a huge crack.

My fellow Democrats are plagued with this political religion based on
power and authority by majority rule. One of my friends, a lifelong Democrat,
explained it to me that since there is no stopping the bigger bully, the only hope
is to use the party to bully back.

So much for Constitutional respect and inclusion, and consent of the governed.
These concepts don't exist where "majority rule" decides what passes as law,
not Constitutional checks and balances and AGREEMENT among States and people
what to authorize to our federal govt.

Once people start voting in whatever is popular, anything goes.

Gotta agree on the SPIRIT of the laws and the process.
THEN the words we need to communicate will follow
when we are ACTUALLY TRYING TO GET ON THE SAME PAGE.

Using words for bullyign and propaganda is not the same.
A few weeks ago, some democrats attended a seminar on how to talk to regular people. You see, they figure maybe those crushing loses in November may be somewhat related to how they present their ideas. They have to make a change, find a hook- like Hillary’s famous, “I ain’t no ways tired” schtick that worked so beautifully in winning the hearts of black people!

Democrats wonder if ordinary folk just don’t understand their clever nuance. They talk differently. They listen differently. So, some dems are flirting with the idea of finding a new way to communicate with all those dummies who don’t live (or aspire to live) in NY, CA, Washington DC, or don’t run to a safe space at the first whiff of differing opinion. You know, those prejudiced deplorables.

Not too many took advantage of this (good for a write off) wine and cheese seminar weekend. Apparently, it was a bit of a bust. They were supposed to learn how to triangulate those rubes from the middle of the country but the seminar leader apparently never mastered the Fly Over dialect.


If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.


It sure doesn’t look like democrats are truly looking to change their message, or the way it’s presented. Nancy Pelosi is back as House spokes mouth. She continues to spout half-truths, innuendo and outright nonsense. Just the other day, she went on a rant about a tweet of Mike Flynn’s- only it wasn’t Mike Flynn’s tweet. (Who’s for another round of Fake News?)

Chuck Schumer has picked up where Harry Reid left off. Just blurt something out! People might think it’s true! Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes, announced Reid. Donald Trump is embarrassed about his cabinet nominees, says Chuck. That’s why he wants to hurry up and have them approved.

What democrats need to learn is that more and more Americans are on to them. They understand that dishonesty is the democrat dialect, so they don’t believe them anymore.


Maybe it doesn’t matter if democrats don’t articulate to all Americans. There are other paths to communication skullduggery and government bureaucrats who remain true to the party line are on it. EPA drones had a good cry and now are protesting Scott Pruitt as head of the department. Is Pruitt incompetent? Nah. He just isn’t a leftist. These workers are entitled to their opinions but they don’t get to pick their boss. That’s not stopping them from emoting. Save the planet! Don’t let Donald Trump pick the head of the EPA!

Other government bureaucrats have surely had a hand in getting Mike Flynn kicked out of the Trump administration. We don’t really know what was said and not said in Flynn’s phone call with the Russian Ambassador. We do know that there was a leak about the phone call itself, and it had to have come from someone in a government department able to listen in on Flynn. So we have a sudden anonymous leak. The democrats and their media allies add a dash of innuendo and Flynn looked bad. We are told Flynn didn’t tell Pence all the details about a conversation. Now Flynn is out. Will we hear about who is doing this illegal leaking? Doesn’t seem so, the media has moved on to complaining about how much money is being spent to protect Trump and his family.

And they wonder why Trump considers them purveyors of Fake News.


There is surely more democrat talk on the way. Former president Barack Obama promised he was not leaving, that he intends to return to his roots. That would be Community Organizing, where all that is accomplished, is talk.


We’ll hear.



http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/democrats-real-people-lessons-234198

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13525/poll-would-trump-win-re-election-against-elizabeth-hank-berrien

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html

Insiders: Obama Holdover 'Shadow Government' Plotting to Undermine Trump - Breitbart

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-gop-wants-rush-through-cabinet-nominees-because-theyre-ashamed-them

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats/index.html?sr=twpol021817liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats1131PMVODtopLink&linkId=34650328

Who Rules the United States?
 
Nice post.
The Marxist Democrats keep focusing on the point that they need to get their message out in a better manner.
Getting out their message isn't the problem. The problem is the message!
Their only message is higher taxes, more regulation, bigger government, and poor economic growth. No one is buying that message any more. Not even the the typical power bases of the Marxist Democrats - minorities.
 
I don't have much hope for the democrats because they are doubling down on their mistakes, sinking even further into a morass of identity politics and living in denial as to why they lost in the first place.

I can give no better example of one Keith Ellison, who is set to take the reins of the DNC. Here you have an Islamist who colludes directly with the Muslim Brotherhood, who is a protégé of Louis Farrakhan, who once said that Blacks should carve out their own country within the United States and who is so anti-Semitic, he makes David Duke look almost moderate in comparison.

It seems to me that as the Democratic train is wobbling a bit on its tracks, they have decided to remove the wheels altogether.
 
I don't have much hope for the democrats because they are doubling down on their mistakes, sinking even further into a morass of identity politics and living in denial as to why they lost in the first place.

I can give no better example of one Keith Ellison, who is set to take the reins of the DNC. Here you have an Islamist who colludes directly with the Muslim Brotherhood, who is a protégé of Louis Farrakhan, who once said that Blacks should carve out their own country within the United States and who is so anti-Semitic, he makes David Duke look almost moderate in comparison.

It seems to me that as the Democratic train is wobbling a bit on its tracks, they have decided to remove the wheels altogether.
This could be, but the Democrats have a very big potential ace in the hole - Trump.

If this administration goes off the rails, it may not matter where the Dems are on the spectrum, and that is worrisome.

I'd like to see them go back to being traditional liberals, but there is zero sign that's going to happen. And again, they may not have to.
.
 
Last edited:
Disagree. With D acting out continuing like the presidential campaign is still going, Trump can and will get away with a huge error rate. If current trends continue the Ds will reelect Trump regardless of his record.
 
A few weeks ago, some democrats attended a seminar on how to talk to regular people. You see, they figure maybe those crushing loses in November may be somewhat related to how they present their ideas. They have to make a change, find a hook- like Hillary’s famous, “I ain’t no ways tired” schtick that worked so beautifully in winning the hearts of black people!

Democrats wonder if ordinary folk just don’t understand their clever nuance. They talk differently. They listen differently. So, some dems are flirting with the idea of finding a new way to communicate with all those dummies who don’t live (or aspire to live) in NY, CA, Washington DC, or don’t run to a safe space at the first whiff of differing opinion. You know, those prejudiced deplorables.

Not too many took advantage of this (good for a write off) wine and cheese seminar weekend. Apparently, it was a bit of a bust. They were supposed to learn how to triangulate those rubes from the middle of the country but the seminar leader apparently never mastered the Fly Over dialect.


If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.


It sure doesn’t look like democrats are truly looking to change their message, or the way it’s presented. Nancy Pelosi is back as House spokes mouth. She continues to spout half-truths, innuendo and outright nonsense. Just the other day, she went on a rant about a tweet of Mike Flynn’s- only it wasn’t Mike Flynn’s tweet. (Who’s for another round of Fake News?)

Chuck Schumer has picked up where Harry Reid left off. Just blurt something out! People might think it’s true! Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes, announced Reid. Donald Trump is embarrassed about his cabinet nominees, says Chuck. That’s why he wants to hurry up and have them approved.

What democrats need to learn is that more and more Americans are on to them. They understand that dishonesty is the democrat dialect, so they don’t believe them anymore.


Maybe it doesn’t matter if democrats don’t articulate to all Americans. There are other paths to communication skullduggery and government bureaucrats who remain true to the party line are on it. EPA drones had a good cry and now are protesting Scott Pruitt as head of the department. Is Pruitt incompetent? Nah. He just isn’t a leftist. These workers are entitled to their opinions but they don’t get to pick their boss. That’s not stopping them from emoting. Save the planet! Don’t let Donald Trump pick the head of the EPA!

Other government bureaucrats have surely had a hand in getting Mike Flynn kicked out of the Trump administration. We don’t really know what was said and not said in Flynn’s phone call with the Russian Ambassador. We do know that there was a leak about the phone call itself, and it had to have come from someone in a government department able to listen in on Flynn. So we have a sudden anonymous leak. The democrats and their media allies add a dash of innuendo and Flynn looked bad. We are told Flynn didn’t tell Pence all the details about a conversation. Now Flynn is out. Will we hear about who is doing this illegal leaking? Doesn’t seem so, the media has moved on to complaining about how much money is being spent to protect Trump and his family.

And they wonder why Trump considers them purveyors of Fake News.


There is surely more democrat talk on the way. Former president Barack Obama promised he was not leaving, that he intends to return to his roots. That would be Community Organizing, where all that is accomplished, is talk.


We’ll hear.



http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/democrats-real-people-lessons-234198

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13525/poll-would-trump-win-re-election-against-elizabeth-hank-berrien

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html

Insiders: Obama Holdover 'Shadow Government' Plotting to Undermine Trump - Breitbart

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-gop-wants-rush-through-cabinet-nominees-because-theyre-ashamed-them

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats/index.html?sr=twpol021817liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats1131PMVODtopLink&linkId=34650328

Who Rules the United States?
Fake news
 
This could be, but the Democrats have a very big potential ace in the hole - Trump.

If this administration goes off the rails, it may not matter where the Dems are on the spectrum, and that is worrisome.

I'd like to see them go back to being traditional liberals, but there is zero sign that's going to happen. And again, they may not have to.
.


Yep.

What worries me is the way the pendulum keeps swinging further and further in each cycle of action and reaction.
 
This could be, but the Democrats have a very big potential ace in the hole - Trump.

If this administration goes off the rails, it may not matter where the Dems are on the spectrum, and that is worrisome.

I'd like to see them go back to being traditional liberals, but there is zero sign that's going to happen. And again, they may not have to.
.


Yep.

What worries me is the way the pendulum keeps swinging further and further in each cycle of action and reaction.
Oh yeah. That's my biggest concern.

As long as we're divided like this, as long as the crazies are in control, that's the danger.
.
 
If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.

Um... okay. Not really.

Donald Trump, who I have to point out a majority of this country voted against, didn't speak to people, he outright lied to them.

He told them he was going to bring back good factory jobs that were lost to automation decades ago.

He told them illegals were stealing their jobs, when most illegals do jobs Americans wouldn't do no matter how much you paid them.

He told them there was a scary Muslim under the bed when they were more than likely to be shot by an angry white guy with too many guns.

In short, Trump was the guy telling them to have another drink while Hillary was the person telling them if they didn't knock it off, their liver was going to implode.

But since the GOP has spent the last 25 years calling Hillary a liar and hundreds of millions of dollars failing to prove that, she wasn't the best person to tell us hard truths we didn't want to hear.
 
This could be, but the Democrats have a very big potential ace in the hole - Trump.

If this administration goes off the rails, it may not matter where the Dems are on the spectrum, and that is worrisome.

I'd like to see them go back to being traditional liberals, but there is zero sign that's going to happen. And again, they may not have to.

Meh... not really.

The fact they elected Perez and Not Ellison as chairman tells me that the Democrats are aiming for the center.

But the reality, what you call "Traditional Liberalism" was considered pretty far off the rails at the time it was proposed.

Social Security? What a crazy idea, paying old people who were no longer useful to the rich!

Civil Rights? Those darkies should be happy sitting at the back of the bus!

20 years ago, gay marriage would have been considered "off the rails'. Today, everyone but the most nutty Christians accept that, hey, it's no big deal.
 
We chuckled at the brilliant Mr. Bannon's comment, "We'll have that dirty Puerto Rican maggot Perez in Gitmo before the year is over."

Know what we mean?
 
Why are only rural white people defined as "regular people"?

Why aren't Republicans asked why they can't talk to "regular people" when they lose?

Why perpetuate the slur that only Democrats are "elitist", and not tar billionaire Republicans are men of the people?

Why so many double standards in the OP? It verges on being a concern troll piece.
 
A few weeks ago, some democrats attended a seminar on how to talk to regular people. You see, they figure maybe those crushing loses in November may be somewhat related to how they present their ideas. They have to make a change, find a hook- like Hillary’s famous, “I ain’t no ways tired” schtick that worked so beautifully in winning the hearts of black people!

Democrats wonder if ordinary folk just don’t understand their clever nuance. They talk differently. They listen differently. So, some dems are flirting with the idea of finding a new way to communicate with all those dummies who don’t live (or aspire to live) in NY, CA, Washington DC, or don’t run to a safe space at the first whiff of differing opinion. You know, those prejudiced deplorables.

Not too many took advantage of this (good for a write off) wine and cheese seminar weekend. Apparently, it was a bit of a bust. They were supposed to learn how to triangulate those rubes from the middle of the country but the seminar leader apparently never mastered the Fly Over dialect.


If democrats really want to learn about communication styles and winning, they might consider studying Donald Trump’s approach to speaking. Let’s face it, no one will mistake Trump for a lyrical speaker but he resonates with many Americans- even some who used to vote democrat. Why? He talks to them. His nose is not in the air. In all his ineloquence, Donald Trump offers that old fashioned approach of offering ideas and beliefs- straight up, hold the nuance. Trump says things like, this is a great country. We are a great people. Government works for the People. More Americans believe that, than believe what democrats tell them. Things like: Americans who are concerned about terrorism are Islamophobes.


It sure doesn’t look like democrats are truly looking to change their message, or the way it’s presented. Nancy Pelosi is back as House spokes mouth. She continues to spout half-truths, innuendo and outright nonsense. Just the other day, she went on a rant about a tweet of Mike Flynn’s- only it wasn’t Mike Flynn’s tweet. (Who’s for another round of Fake News?)

Chuck Schumer has picked up where Harry Reid left off. Just blurt something out! People might think it’s true! Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes, announced Reid. Donald Trump is embarrassed about his cabinet nominees, says Chuck. That’s why he wants to hurry up and have them approved.

What democrats need to learn is that more and more Americans are on to them. They understand that dishonesty is the democrat dialect, so they don’t believe them anymore.


Maybe it doesn’t matter if democrats don’t articulate to all Americans. There are other paths to communication skullduggery and government bureaucrats who remain true to the party line are on it. EPA drones had a good cry and now are protesting Scott Pruitt as head of the department. Is Pruitt incompetent? Nah. He just isn’t a leftist. These workers are entitled to their opinions but they don’t get to pick their boss. That’s not stopping them from emoting. Save the planet! Don’t let Donald Trump pick the head of the EPA!

Other government bureaucrats have surely had a hand in getting Mike Flynn kicked out of the Trump administration. We don’t really know what was said and not said in Flynn’s phone call with the Russian Ambassador. We do know that there was a leak about the phone call itself, and it had to have come from someone in a government department able to listen in on Flynn. So we have a sudden anonymous leak. The democrats and their media allies add a dash of innuendo and Flynn looked bad. We are told Flynn didn’t tell Pence all the details about a conversation. Now Flynn is out. Will we hear about who is doing this illegal leaking? Doesn’t seem so, the media has moved on to complaining about how much money is being spent to protect Trump and his family.

And they wonder why Trump considers them purveyors of Fake News.


There is surely more democrat talk on the way. Former president Barack Obama promised he was not leaving, that he intends to return to his roots. That would be Community Organizing, where all that is accomplished, is talk.


We’ll hear.



http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/democrats-real-people-lessons-234198

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13525/poll-would-trump-win-re-election-against-elizabeth-hank-berrien

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/17/leaked-emails-dem-state-leaders-think-obama-s-new-organizing-army-is-grade-a-bullshit.html

Insiders: Obama Holdover 'Shadow Government' Plotting to Undermine Trump - Breitbart

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/schumer-gop-wants-rush-through-cabinet-nominees-because-theyre-ashamed-them

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats/index.html?sr=twpol021817liberal-group-primary-challenge-democrats1131PMVODtopLink&linkId=34650328

Who Rules the United States?

The best communication is when you are without a job, with no prospects, and now made to live on the crumbs of the welfare system.

Nothing talks like money.
 
Why are only rural white people defined as "regular people"?

Why aren't Republicans asked why they can't talk to "regular people" when they lose?

Why perpetuate the slur that only Democrats are "elitist", and not tar billionaire Republicans are men of the people?

Why so many double standards in the OP? It verges on being a concern troll piece.

Quite right. You see, they keep forgetting their guy lost by 3 million votes and only won because too many otherwise sensible people voted for 3rd party protest candidates because they were told Hillary "had this in the bag".
 
The Democraps are not a party . They are a squalid alliance of screeching buhneegar parasites, furtive border-jumping cucarachas, shrieking diseased sex pervs, filthy raghead subhumans, dirty welfare maggots, loathsome God-hating rodents, tranny nightcrawlers, and sundry America-hating excrement -- united in their shiftlessness, immorality and bileous hatred for free enterprise and common decency.

We don't mean this in a negative way.

Know what we mean?
 

Forum List

Back
Top