Democrats to propose legislation expanding the Supreme Court

No, we don't. We want Bart O'kavenaugh removed for cause, and then you need to decide whether you wanna keep goresuch or barrett, because by your own reasoning one or the other is illegitimate.

What cause? Because the Nazis slandered and libeled him?

Fuck you.

Bring in the Chinese, Motherfucker. That's your end game - take this civil war the Nazi democrats are waging against America - this treason of the fuckwad scum democrats - and push it to the point that decent people take up arms against the Nazi fucks. Then the Nazis will turn to you, to your country, and ask you to invade with the help of the democrats, to "restore order."
You seem disturbed you lost the election. The Dems have restored order.
I see you didn't know that 52% of the little girls whose parents paid for them to get across the Rio Grande and the U.S.- Mex. Border are raped on the way here; 11% of them have Covid-19 and some frightening variants that could decimate border states and red states they are arbitrarily bussed to by blue state deciders. Hate and retaliation follow Biden before he fucks a billion dollars out of his target(s).

Stop pretenses that you didn't see the videos of Biden bragging how he got the Ukrainian top cop fired for asking what Hunter Biden's credentials were for his seat on Burisma's board in which he was not required to attend board meetings to merit leeching a million a year outta Burisma. And Daddy Biden dearest threatened to use his vice presidential power to criminally extort a billion of the $3.5 billion American taxpayers furnished for Ukraine to defend itself from Russian genocide like the starvation of Ukrainian farmers beyond the end of World War II when the KJB was into making dissenters of Russian Satellite states sorry for resisting taxation without representation.
Oh yes Biden got the billion from Ukraine 6 hours later' an hour before Air Force took off. And not a nickel of that billion went to charity.
Democratic Party only wants votes. Why they want to stack the Court.
Democrats wish to make Republicans follow the Constitution.

Oh, is that a fact? Let's just discuss how much Democrats love and want to adhere to the Constitution, shall we?

Article I, Section I - All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Well, we already know Democrats/leftists don't like that, because they want laws to be made by executive orders, unelected bureaucrats writing regulations, and the Supreme Court handing down judicial fiats.

Section 4 - The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;

We know they don't consider that part to be important, since we saw in the last election that they consider governors, secretaries of state, and pretty much any other state government employee to be just as empowered to make or change election law if they feel like it.

Section 8 - The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;


Democrats/leftists have made it quite clear that they consider this extensive listing of the specific powers of Congress to be irrelevant, as they would prefer to focus entirely on the phrase "provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States" and interpret it to mean, "Or, y'know, whatever else we feel like doing at the moment."

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings;

Kick that to the curb, because Democrats/leftists now want the District of Columbia to be a state in itself.

Section 10 - No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Can we say "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact"?

And that's just the first Article.

To be continued . . .

Article II, Section I - Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

Not only are Democrats enthusiastically arguing to abolish the Electoral College, which would at least require an Amendment passed through the proper channels, but may I also direct your attention yet again to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, the illegal attempt to simply ignore the Electoral College entirely?

Section 3 - He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Last time I checked, immigration law is still on the books and valid, but does anyone notice President Asterisk "taking care that" THOSE laws "be faithfully executed"? How about the previous Democrat-in-Chief, President "I'm black and that's all that matters"?

Section 4 - The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Two - not one, but TWO - impeachments of Donald Trump for 100% made-up bullshit.

To be continued . . .
 
Nice try.
4i6Ckte.gif


Republicans packed the court by denying Obama's pick for 8 months because it was too close to an election, then rushing through Barrett with 8 DAYS before the election. Republicans packed the court by installing 230+ lifetime judges under Trump.

So fuck off with your bullshit. The Democrats are going to balance the courts, by adding more SCOTUS Justices and by expanding the District Courts. And hopefully, convince Breyer to retire.
Garland is a far Left whackjob that deserved ZERO consideration for the USSC after Scalia was murdered by Democrats. The Constitution says "Advise and consent" not "Rubberstamp Obama's picks}", asshole.
 
They like to socialize something outrageous then follow up with something less and call it moderate, so I predict they will come back to 11 and tell everyone it was a massive compromise.
 
So, again, how many times do 'we' keep packing the court to change the hand dealt 'we' don't like?

And the Democrats urinate on RBG's memory by ignoring her and her opinion that 9 is enough?!

Whatever it takes to gain power, I guess.
 
It may not be this year or next, but it's coming if the Far Left every gets 51 votes in the Senate and controls the House and the Presidency.

1618599794145.png
 
This initiative is far, far off the beaten path in that it's too extremist for the existing situation. Biden's first task is to gain the sympathy of a large enough majority of the people before any tampering with the corrupt Scotus.

When, or if, the people become sympathetic to social change that hugely benefits the working class American, Biden will have the backing to tackle more socially responsible change such as doing something to fix the Scotus.

Or more likely, the only possible fix for the Scotus would be in changing attitudes of the justices themselves.

Roberts has already shown signs of being more interested in a just court than being politically biased.
None of the rest show any signs of being too stubborn to change their opinions.

Issues such as allowing a rational outcome on abortion, can only be decided one way. Religious dogma too will have to be dealt with rationally and according to modern science.[/B]
 
No, we don't. We want Bart O'kavenaugh removed for cause, and then you need to decide whether you wanna keep goresuch or barrett, because by your own reasoning one or the other is illegitimate.

What cause? Because the Nazis slandered and libeled him?

Fuck you.

Bring in the Chinese, Motherfucker. That's your end game - take this civil war the Nazi democrats are waging against America - this treason of the fuckwad scum democrats - and push it to the point that decent people take up arms against the Nazi fucks. Then the Nazis will turn to you, to your country, and ask you to invade with the help of the democrats, to "restore order."
You seem disturbed you lost the election. The Dems have restored order.
I see you didn't know that 52% of the little girls whose parents paid for them to get across the Rio Grande and the U.S.- Mex. Border are raped on the way here; 11% of them have Covid-19 and some frightening variants that could decimate border states and red states they are arbitrarily bussed to by blue state deciders. Hate and retaliation follow Biden before he fucks a billion dollars out of his target(s).

Stop pretenses that you didn't see the videos of Biden bragging how he got the Ukrainian top cop fired for asking what Hunter Biden's credentials were for his seat on Burisma's board in which he was not required to attend board meetings to merit leeching a million a year outta Burisma. And Daddy Biden dearest threatened to use his vice presidential power to criminally extort a billion of the $3.5 billion American taxpayers furnished for Ukraine to defend itself from Russian genocide like the starvation of Ukrainian farmers beyond the end of World War II when the KJB was into making dissenters of Russian Satellite states sorry for resisting taxation without representation.
Oh yes Biden got the billion from Ukraine 6 hours later' an hour before Air Force took off. And not a nickel of that billion went to charity.
Democratic Party only wants votes. Why they want to stack the Court.
Democrats wish to make Republicans follow the Constitution.

Oh, is that a fact? Let's just discuss how much Democrats love and want to adhere to the Constitution, shall we?

Article I, Section I - All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Well, we already know Democrats/leftists don't like that, because they want laws to be made by executive orders, unelected bureaucrats writing regulations, and the Supreme Court handing down judicial fiats.

Section 4 - The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;

We know they don't consider that part to be important, since we saw in the last election that they consider governors, secretaries of state, and pretty much any other state government employee to be just as empowered to make or change election law if they feel like it.

Section 8 - The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;


Democrats/leftists have made it quite clear that they consider this extensive listing of the specific powers of Congress to be irrelevant, as they would prefer to focus entirely on the phrase "provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States" and interpret it to mean, "Or, y'know, whatever else we feel like doing at the moment."

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings;

Kick that to the curb, because Democrats/leftists now want the District of Columbia to be a state in itself.

Section 10 - No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Can we say "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact"?

And that's just the first Article.

To be continued . . .

Article II, Section I - Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

Not only are Democrats enthusiastically arguing to abolish the Electoral College, which would at least require an Amendment passed through the proper channels, but may I also direct your attention yet again to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, the illegal attempt to simply ignore the Electoral College entirely?

Section 3 - He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Last time I checked, immigration law is still on the books and valid, but does anyone notice President Asterisk "taking care that" THOSE laws "be faithfully executed"? How about the previous Democrat-in-Chief, President "I'm black and that's all that matters"?

Section 4 - The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Two - not one, but TWO - impeachments of Donald Trump for 100% made-up bullshit.

To be continued . . .

Any leftist trying to sanctimoniously tell us about "defending the Constitution" or "adhering to the Constitution" isn't doing too well so far, because we can see that they've shredded both the first two Articles, and we still have a LOT of document to get through.

Let's see how much Democrats/leftists "love" the Constitution in Article III, shall we?

Article III, Section 2 - The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment; shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.


Where do I even start with this? From the Democrat insistence on judging nominations by political ideology instead of jurisprudence- and confirming people who state outright that they prefer to rule based on their own "superior" morals rather than the actual law - to their desire to have laws handed down by judicial fiat rather than going through the legislative process to their attempts to decide cases via the media and threats of mob violence instead of jury trials to their willingness to obliterate any sense of legitimacy and authority the courts have to get their own agenda through court-packing, this Article more than any other has served as Democrat/leftist toilet paper for as long as I can remember.

To be continued . . .
 
Nice try.
4i6Ckte.gif


Republicans packed the court by denying Obama's pick for 8 months because it was too close to an election, then rushing through Barrett with 8 DAYS before the election. Republicans packed the court by installing 230+ lifetime judges under Trump.

So fuck off with your bullshit. The Democrats are going to balance the courts, by adding more SCOTUS Justices and by expanding the District Courts. And hopefully, convince Breyer to retire.


Guess you haven't heard there commie. Palousey killed the house bill. Said she wants to hear what the commission has to say.

.
I've been watching Nancy Pelosi operate for a long time. This is a tactic. Throw ice cold water on the idea from the jump, but eventually being a proponent.
 
Nice try.
4i6Ckte.gif


Republicans packed the court by denying Obama's pick for 8 months because it was too close to an election, then rushing through Barrett with 8 DAYS before the election. Republicans packed the court by installing 230+ lifetime judges under Trump.

So fuck off with your bullshit. The Democrats are going to balance the courts, by adding more SCOTUS Justices and by expanding the District Courts. And hopefully, convince Breyer to retire.

Another leftist moron who doesn't know what packing the court means.

Typical leftist fascist move by the Nazi party, make up your own definition for words
Ok, tell me what it means, then.
4i6Ckte.gif
 
Nice try.
4i6Ckte.gif


Republicans packed the court by denying Obama's pick for 8 months because it was too close to an election, then rushing through Barrett with 8 DAYS before the election. Republicans packed the court by installing 230+ lifetime judges under Trump.

So fuck off with your bullshit. The Democrats are going to balance the courts, by adding more SCOTUS Justices and by expanding the District Courts. And hopefully, convince Breyer to retire.
Garland is a far Left whackjob that deserved ZERO consideration for the USSC after Scalia was murdered by Democrats. The Constitution says "Advise and consent" not "Rubberstamp Obama's picks}", asshole.
Then why did those same Republicans vote to confirm him to the lifetime appointment he held when he was nominated for SCOTUS - Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit?
 
Nice try.
4i6Ckte.gif


Republicans packed the court by denying Obama's pick for 8 months because it was too close to an election, then rushing through Barrett with 8 DAYS before the election. Republicans packed the court by installing 230+ lifetime judges under Trump.

So fuck off with your bullshit. The Democrats are going to balance the courts, by adding more SCOTUS Justices and by expanding the District Courts. And hopefully, convince Breyer to retire.

Another leftist moron who doesn't know what packing the court means.

Typical leftist fascist move by the Nazi party, make up your own definition for words
Ok, tell me what it means, then.
4i6Ckte.gif

You're on the internet, you can google words you don't know rather than making up your own definition
 
So much for that noise....

Open SmartNews and read "Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats" here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
To read it on the web, tap here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
The reaction was huge and instantaneous. The proposal never had a chance of passing. The proposal might be what is necessary to completely sink all democrat chances next election.
 
Nice try.
4i6Ckte.gif


Republicans packed the court by denying Obama's pick for 8 months because it was too close to an election, then rushing through Barrett with 8 DAYS before the election. Republicans packed the court by installing 230+ lifetime judges under Trump.

So fuck off with your bullshit. The Democrats are going to balance the courts, by adding more SCOTUS Justices and by expanding the District Courts. And hopefully, convince Breyer to retire.
Garland is a far Left whackjob that deserved ZERO consideration for the USSC after Scalia was murdered by Democrats. The Constitution says "Advise and consent" not "Rubberstamp Obama's picks}", asshole.
Then why did those same Republicans vote to confirm him to the lifetime appointment he held when he was nominated for SCOTUS - Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit?
Because they wisened up to Obama and his anti American crap.
 
So much for that noise....

Open SmartNews and read "Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats" here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
To read it on the web, tap here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
The reaction was huge and instantaneous. The proposal never had a chance of passing. The proposal might be what is necessary to completely sink all democrat chances next election.
NY is already poised to become more red because of Andy Cuomo.
 
So much for that noise....

Open SmartNews and read "Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats" here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
To read it on the web, tap here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
The reaction was huge and instantaneous. The proposal never had a chance of passing. The proposal might be what is necessary to completely sink all democrat chances next election.
NY is already poised to become more red because of Andy Cuomo.
New York City is on its way to being populated exclusively by criminals.
 
So much for that noise....

Open SmartNews and read "Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats" here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
To read it on the web, tap here: Speaker Pelosi throws cold water on a progressive bill that would expand the Supreme Court to 13 seats
The reaction was huge and instantaneous. The proposal never had a chance of passing. The proposal might be what is necessary to completely sink all democrat chances next election.
NY is already poised to become more red because of Andy Cuomo.
New York City is on its way to being populated exclusively by criminals.
I'm talking about the GOOD part of the state. Not the sewer.
 
Nice try.
4i6Ckte.gif


Republicans packed the court by denying Obama's pick for 8 months because it was too close to an election, then rushing through Barrett with 8 DAYS before the election. Republicans packed the court by installing 230+ lifetime judges under Trump.

So fuck off with your bullshit. The Democrats are going to balance the courts, by adding more SCOTUS Justices and by expanding the District Courts. And hopefully, convince Breyer to retire.


Guess you haven't heard there commie. Palousey killed the house bill. Said she wants to hear what the commission has to say.

.
I've been watching Nancy Pelosi operate for a long time. This is a tactic. Throw ice cold water on the idea from the jump, but eventually being a proponent.


So you're saying she's a two face lying bitch, got it.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top