Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
Absolutely not. No compromise with the devilThe Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
It is already fixed in their favor. We know how each Dem judge will vote near 100 per cent of the time. That is Progressive socialist. They do not place people with left, center and right wing traditional Democratic Party philosophies. Somehow Repubs put people in who are all over the place in their votes. This is a one of the reasons our nation is in decline.The dems say the court is broken and they want to fix it...but the court is not broken...they don't want to fix the court they want a fixed court...but keep in mind Joe does not enjoy a clear mandate with the voters...if they push this through the dems will be a minority party for decades....and the GOP will just change it back...so go ahead stupid libs...do it....do ya feel lucky? Punks.....remember we warned ya...just like we warned Reid....
Secede is not the solution. It's a clear victory for fascism or it's defeat of fascism for the foreseeable future.Absolutely not. No compromise with the devilThe Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
Change for sake of change does not cut it
The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
The dems say the court is broken and they want to fix it...but the court is not broken...they don't want to fix the court they want a fixed court...but keep in mind Joe does not enjoy a clear mandate with the voters...if they push this through the dems will be a minority party for decades....and the GOP will just change it back...so go ahead stupid libs...do it....do ya feel lucky? Punks.....remember we warned ya...just like we warned Reid....
The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
This is not viable, there is no way the Senate Repubs are going to support allowing Biden to put 2 extra liberal justices on the Court this year. Nor should they, that is not a compromise; it is capitulation. Look, at this point the democrats have no reason to believe the current arrangement is unfair or biased against them. I think the real problem is what the democrats want to do in the future, which is ramming through whatever they can without concern for constitutionality. And they don't want to compromise at all with the GOP, so why should the GOP give away anything for nothing?
And I believe any Repub who supports your 'compromise' is very likely to find himself out of a job as soon as they come up for re-election.
You mean McConnell puts his mistaken sense of what is American above country.,Once again the Dimwinger party ignores the will of America and acts in the interest of party over country.
New Poll Shows 61% of Americans Oppose Joe Biden Packing the Supreme Court - LifeNews.com
Nearly two in three voters say they oppose 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden adding more Supreme Court justices if he is elected, according to a poll exclusively obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The Marist poll, sponsored by the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List, found...www.lifenews.com
We need another one of these guys...The whole entire government needs to be reorganized.
I think the real problem, because the GOP will not compromise, is that the Republicans want to do in the future is to do whatever they can without concern for constitutionality.The Democrats proposed today expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by four justices. Obvious the goal being to pack the Supreme Court with four Biden nominees which one could assume would compensate for the two extra justices that President Trump managed to appoint.
While it might seem like this is an all or nothing proposal, it can be tweeked to become a viable compromise.
1) Expand the court by two justices effective in 2022. This gives President Biden and the liberals a guaranteed two Supreme Court seats to fill.
2) Expand the court by another two justices effective in 2025. This would mean that although it is possible that Biden would have two more justices to appoint, it is equally possible a Republican president would get to fill those seats. Or that even if Biden (or another Democrat) was president in 2025, that the GOP might control the Senate giving the GOP input into the filling of the seats.
While expanding the court is NOT my preference, I think this shows that even on the most difficult issue, compromise is doable.
Opinions?
This is not viable, there is no way the Senate Repubs are going to support allowing Biden to put 2 extra liberal justices on the Court this year. Nor should they, that is not a compromise; it is capitulation. Look, at this point the democrats have no reason to believe the current arrangement is unfair or biased against them. I think the real problem is what the democrats want to do in the future, which is ramming through whatever they can without concern for constitutionality. And they don't want to compromise at all with the GOP, so why should the GOP give away anything for nothing?
And I believe any Repub who supports your 'compromise' is very likely to find himself out of a job as soon as they come up for re-election.
Not at all.We need another one of these guys...The whole entire government needs to be reorganized.
Calvin Coolidge - HISTORY
Hardly, don’t flatter yourself.^^^Triggered^^^ LOLReally, logic and you are mutual exclusive.I do? LOL show me where, filthy human. I portray Myself as a logical citizen. You believe men may identify as women. You failed basic biology.Again you portray yourself as a strict constitutional republic and you don’t know what the document states?No idea. I am Not a constitutional expert. Hell make it 100. Let’s expand our Govt even more. I am agreeing with you.What does the vaulted Constitution say about size of the court?13? Let’s make it 20. Why 13? Racist!Don’t worry, you’ll soon love the idea of 13 justicesThey're doing a six month study. It will never happen.Democrats want to pick 4 more anti Republican Supreme Court Justices. I saw this a few minutes ago on Fox tv. What do you think?
foxnews.com
It should never happen. However, there should be some way to make right the seat Mitch McConnell stole from Obama. Republicans suck.
In reality you're just some turd posting bullshit looking for another turd to like you.
Try identifying as a man and see how that goes for you
