Democrats Pushing Neighbors to Spy on Gun Owners

[M14 Shooter]

They can't control us if we're armed.

The state cannot have a monopoly on force, if the citizenry remains armed.

 

[Donald H]

I'm short and fat and my neighbor doesn't have any idea that even own guns.

You must have meant that your neighbour doesn't own a gun?

Or did you mean that your neighbour doesn't know that you don't own a gun?

If you're short and fat, I feel safe in assuming you own a gun, and moderately safe that you prefer long barrels.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

If you're short and fat, I feel safe in assuming you own a gun, and moderately safe that you prefer long barrels.

It depends.

 

[Donald H]

The state cannot have a monopoly on force, if the citizenry remains armed.

If the state has to get serious on account of another coup attempt, the force won't be coming from a few government guns!

Try to imagine an F-16 hitting the enemy's nest with persuasive force enough to set the revolutionaries a runnin with their tails tucked. They will have lost all interest in taking their AR-15's along with them.

 

[LibertyKid]

The right worries too much about guns while trying to erase the frst amendment.

Huh, this makes absolutely no sense.

John Kerry against the First Amendment: Saying the Quiet Part Aloud​

John Kerry against the First Amendment: Saying the Quiet Part Aloud | National Review

It is hard, grumbles Kerry, to ‘build consensus.’ Good. Democracy is not meant to be easy.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Crepitus]

I'm not sure how to feel about this. As this is most definitely extreme gun control but yet I know that if it isn't secured properly that there have been stories of children grabbing hold of them and either accidentally or purposely shooting each other or purposely shooting up schools.

I'm pretty sure that the latter isn't why this is happening though. As the guy in the video says though, education is key.

And republican sheriffs are asking for the names and addresses of people with Harris/Walz yard signs for future retaliation.

A little fascism, anyone?

 

[Crepitus]

They can't control us if we're armed.

Lol, you and your AR against a swat team, huh?

you wannabe ramboes crack me up!!

 

[Crepitus]

Huh, this makes absolutely no sense.

John Kerry against the First Amendment: Saying the Quiet Part Aloud​

John Kerry against the First Amendment: Saying the Quiet Part Aloud | National Review

It is hard, grumbles Kerry, to ‘build consensus.’ Good. Democracy is not meant to be easy.

www.nationalreview.com

That's a deliberate misinterpretation of what he said.

Not that it matters because he's not in charge of anything anyway.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Huh, this makes absolutely no sense.

John Kerry against the First Amendment: Saying the Quiet Part Aloud​

Liberals hate dissent.
It forces them to defend their positions, which they are rarely able to do.

 

[LibertyKid]

That's a deliberate misinterpretation of what he said.

Not that it matters because he's not in charge of anything anyway.

Not really: The problem is who is in charge what is considered "misinformation"? And Kerry said, the First Amendment is a blocker to stopping misinformation.

 

[Crepitus]

Not really:

yes, really.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Lol, you and your AR against a swat team, huh?

you wannabe ramboes crack me up!!

I spent 23 years in the Army. I know way more tricks than they do...lol

After seeing the Uvalde swat team, do you think SWAT teams are scary anymore?

 

[M14 Shooter]

After seeing the Uvalde swat team, do you think SWAT teams are scary anymore?

Apparently, the police are too afraid of our AR15s to confiscate them.

 

[LibertyKid]

yes, really.

Ignore the rest of what I posted, that's fine.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Ignore the rest of what I posted, that's fine.

Trolls do that.

 

[Crepitus]

Ignore the rest of what I posted, that's fine.

I will, because it's the same bullshit you kids always spew.

Nobody is talking about stopping opinions.

 

[LibertyKid]

I will, because it's the same bullshit you kids always spew.

Nobody is talking about stopping opinions.

I didn't say opinions. Nice try. The concern and you understand this is who is the gate keeper of "Misinformation" and who deems what to be misinformation.

Does any free society need the gov't managing "information"? Logically, you understand where that goes. And it's okay to admit it. It's okay to admit that something the dems are leaning towards is wrong, even for them.

 

[westwall]

The right worries too much about guns while trying to erase the frst amendment.

John Kerry, one of your boys just said you democrats need to do away with the First Amendment.

DURRRRRR

You truly are too stupid to be black.

 

[Crepitus]

I didn't say opinions. Nice try. The concern and you understand this is who is the gate keeper of "Misinformation" and who deems what to be misinformation.

Does any free society need the gov't managing "information"? Logically, you understand where that goes. And it's okay to admit it. It's okay to admit that something the dems are leaning towards is wrong, even for them.

Dude, facts are not subjective.

What's true is true. What's not is not.

This is not rocket surgery here.

 

[LibertyKid]

Dude, facts are not subjective.

What's true is true. What's not is not.

This is not rocket surgery here.

I don't disagree as stated, but many times, information isn't always factual. It can be circumstantial, it can be based on personal experience, opinions (editorials) or other factors.

At the end of the day, the question is, who decides what is 'fact'. Do you want that to be the gov't? If so, move to China or North Korea.