Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Divert attention from the real perpetrators. Common subversive trick!
Comey knew that by going public he’d be damned but concluded the alternative option. Suppressing the information until after Nov. 8th would be even worse. Of course, it’s important to note the emails may NOT materially change the findings of the original investigation. There might be nothing new in any of them.
On the other hand, they might contain some of the tens of thousands emails that have mysteriously gone missing from the server.
And even if they don't, Huma still must answer whether her discredited and damaged husband - who was not even a lowly Clinton staffer - potentially had access to the private server. Nobody knows....
He made it clear he didn’t know what was in the emails yet, but that they ‘appear to be pertinent’ to the original investigation. That is self-evidently true.
If the metadata indicates ‘thousands’ of the new emails flowed to and from Clinton’s private server, and were written or received by her top aide, then of course they are ‘pertinent’ and of course they must be investigated.
This is not partisan politics at play, as the Democrats are screaming, this is perfectly normal and reasonable police work.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The witch is sinking.
Comey knew that by going public he’d be damned but concluded the alternative option. Suppressing the information until after Nov. 8th would be even worse. Of course, it’s important to note the emails may NOT materially change the findings of the original investigation. There might be nothing new in any of them.
On the other hand, they might contain some of the tens of thousands emails that have mysteriously gone missing from the server.
And even if they don't, Huma still must answer whether her discredited and damaged husband - who was not even a lowly Clinton staffer - potentially had access to the private server. Nobody knows....
He made it clear he didn’t know what was in the emails yet, but that they ‘appear to be pertinent’ to the original investigation. That is self-evidently true.
If the metadata indicates ‘thousands’ of the new emails flowed to and from Clinton’s private server, and were written or received by her top aide, then of course they are ‘pertinent’ and of course they must be investigated.
This is not partisan politics at play, as the Democrats are screaming, this is perfectly normal and reasonable police work.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
